- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So now reducing C02 will result in oxygen starvation?
Posted on 5/6/25 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 5/6/25 at 3:33 pm
8
Posted on 5/6/25 at 3:44 pm to AdamsHouseCat
So I was severely downvoted for saying in another thread what I’m about to say again.
If NASA experts say so, it must be true.
Make sure you maintain six feet separation from other people and wear your masks, which of course don’t work.
If NASA experts say so, it must be true.
Make sure you maintain six feet separation from other people and wear your masks, which of course don’t work.
This post was edited on 5/6/25 at 5:30 pm
Posted on 5/6/25 at 3:45 pm to AdamsHouseCat
I hope these "NASA scientists" who have been wasting their time and our money coming up with useless sh!te like this are in that $6 Billion Trump wants to cut from NASA.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 3:46 pm to AdamsHouseCat
Reducing amount of available plant food is not necessarily a good thing, unless depopulation is your goal.
Despite the amount of deforestation in the world, we're in a period of global greening and warming. Its natural climate cycles with a debatable amount of human influence. The only way we feed this arse pile of people is grow a lot of food. Global cooling and CO2 reduction are not conducive to that.
Despite the amount of deforestation in the world, we're in a period of global greening and warming. Its natural climate cycles with a debatable amount of human influence. The only way we feed this arse pile of people is grow a lot of food. Global cooling and CO2 reduction are not conducive to that.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 3:50 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
The only way we feed this arse pile of people is grow a lot of food. Global cooling and CO2 reduction are not conducive to that.
The Sahel in Africa began to “re-green” on its own, with no increased rainfall.
Suddenly, the “Great Green Wall” becomes a thing. Coincidence?
Posted on 5/6/25 at 4:09 pm to AdamsHouseCat
"Scientists estimate that this transformation could begin in about 10,000 years."
I was told climate change would destroy us all in 10-20 years, so why should I be concerned about a 10,000-year hypothetical?
If humans are not inhabiting other planets 10,000 years from now, then we deserve to die off.
I was told climate change would destroy us all in 10-20 years, so why should I be concerned about a 10,000-year hypothetical?
If humans are not inhabiting other planets 10,000 years from now, then we deserve to die off.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 4:17 pm to AdamsHouseCat
Easy fix - just burn more fossil fuels.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 4:20 pm to AdamsHouseCat
quote:
One billion years is what’s left for our atmosphere
In one billion years the sun will be ~10% more luminous as it ages. That's probably enough to make earth uninhabitable. You are looking at average earthly temperatures of about 120 degrees F. 7 billion years from now the sun will fully engulf the earth.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 4:22 pm to Deplorableinohio
quote:
If NADA experts say so, it must be true.
What the frick would car dealers know about the truth?
Posted on 5/6/25 at 4:45 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Despite the amount of deforestation in the world, we're in a period of global greening and warming. Its natural climate cycles with a debatable amount of human influence.
This is actually a wild phenomenon to see first hand. I bought some undeveloped land out in the middle of nowhere in 2017. It was clear cut to harvest pines right before I got it. Hardwoods along a creek area and few other clusters were left standing. Not experienced in land management, I just kind of looked at the areas I had and expected them to stay that way using (hopefully) some kind of logic to arrive at that assumption. But lo and behold after a few months everything was basically impenetrable due to an explosion of brush and briar growth. It kind of blew my mind. It's now been about 8 years and I have hundreds and hundreds of 20ft tall semi mature pines (that germinated naturally/were not planted). 10 grand ish on bulldozer work and I can now easily access about 5 out of 25 acres (but the same thing will happen again if I don't keep it brush hogged with my tractor that I didn't have to begin with). The earth is so much stronger and resilient than we imagine. Short of launching an entire arsenal of nukes I'm not sure what we could do to disrupt it. I don't think we could do anything to permanently harm it.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 4:50 pm to AdamsHouseCat
I thought we had too much CO2?
Posted on 5/6/25 at 5:31 pm to Eldodroptop
Correct now. I don’t know if it was me or autocorrect. Either way it’s right now.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 5:36 pm to LSUSkip
quote:
I thought we had too much CO2?
This isn't about global warming (well, not as we conventionally think of it).
Skim the first paragraph.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 6:41 pm to AdamsHouseCat
stupid science malarky . when lines of concern are drawn out to infinity it will always result in collapse
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News