- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So according to Leftists and Liberaltarians , it's not OK to call someone groomer...
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:43 pm to SammyTiger
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:43 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Well semantically it’s because “indoctrinating” kids about gender and sex isn’t the same as setting them up to be sexually assaulted. Which is what grooming is.
Do transgender youth have a higher incidence of being sexually assaulted than cisgender youth?
1
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:43 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Then what are you arguing about? Just counting the minutes until the weekend?
Not quite.
Enjoy the rest of your day. It’s lunch time...
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:43 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
This post was edited on 7/22/22 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:44 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
I love this so much. Another stupid wanna be kiddie fricker that is projecting unto everyone else that, if they oppose, it is actually gay people they "hate", not those who want to frick our kids.
I don’t have to project, when you’re upset about a lesbian telling her student about her wife.
Yeah that’s the first step to that kid getting molested.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:44 pm to oogabooga68
Why you bring Libertarians into this?
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:45 pm to redneck hippie
quote:
You honestly believe that all democrats are child molesters? or are ok with it? is that your stance?
So what is so hard for you to comprehend…..yes, anyone that wants to push Sexuality of any nature on young childrens are fricking sick! No two ways about it.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:45 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Well semantically it’s because “indoctrinating” kids about gender and sex isn’t the same as setting them up to be sexually assaulted. Which is what grooming is.
Question, if someone talks to children and desensitizes them to issues relating to sex, sexual fetishes, and gender identity, have no intention of having sex with them, and that desensitization leads to someone else sexually abusing them, would that someone be considered a groomer in your view?
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:45 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Not quite.
quote:
It’s lunch time...
Ah.
Just trying to make it to lunch...
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:46 pm to pankReb
He anally raped her.
He plead no contest to abduction and sexual battery charges in a second case.
Hank says “Boys will be …. Um…. Well anyway…. People are people.”
He plead no contest to abduction and sexual battery charges in a second case.
Hank says “Boys will be …. Um…. Well anyway…. People are people.”
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:46 pm to the808bass
quote:
He anally raped her.
He plead no contest to abduction and sexual battery charges in a second case.
Hank says “Boys will be …. Um…. Well anyway…. People are people.”
Hank: "He was just trying to get both of them comfortable with his lifestyle."
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:46 pm to oogabooga68
So we should shift straight to the pure truth, they're Child Sexual Predators Targeting Children.
Evil is afraid of the truth.
Evil is afraid of the truth.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:47 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
I don’t have to project, when you’re upset about a lesbian telling her student about her wife.
And you're mischaracterizing that Florida bill.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:47 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
I don’t have to project, when you’re upset about a lesbian telling her student about her wife.
Lolzy.
I love your idiocy. It’s so utterly inane.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:47 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
anyone that wants to push Sexuality of any nature on young childrens are fricking sick
Agreed.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:50 pm to the808bass
quote:
Do transgender youth have a higher incidence of being sexually assaulted than cisgender youth?
Ive seen 13% in trans youth and 1 in 9 amount adolescent girls, so about 11.1%
Trans youth numbers jump up to 22% if they’re homeless (thank their parents)
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:51 pm to Pettifogger
quote:The problem is the same that we encounter all too often ... definitions.
the actual term at issue.quote:
Why is it "wrong" (semantically? Morally? etc.) to call people who want to indoctrinate small children about sex and gender "groomers"?
The OP (and many others) apply the (offensive) term "groomer" to people and activities that OTHERS do not believe CONSTITUTES "grooming" at all, while that latter group CERTAINLY acknowledges that there are ENTIRELY inappropriate activities that DO qualify as "grooming."
Is it "wrong" to use a descriptive term that EVERYONE agrees is offensive ... to describe someone whose actions do not fall within that term, at least under SOME reasonable interpretations?
By analogy (and I know it is not a perfect one), let's assume that three nights per week I consume enough alcohol to take my BAL to 0.06. I am not REMOTELY intoxicated, either legally or behaviorally. Yet a teetotaler might see me as a "drunk" because he disapproves of any alcohol consumption, especially THREE TIMES PER WEEK, no matter how legal or harmless it might be. In HIS eyes, ANY alcohol consumption makes one a "drunk."
He is almost certainly aware that his definition of "drunk" is not universal (no matter how sincerely-held by him), and is almost certainly aware that it is "offensive" to call another person a "drunk."
Yes, if he is even-remotely a polite person, the teetotaler should refrain from using that term in reference to the above-described light drinker.
This post was edited on 7/22/22 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:52 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Well semantically it’s because “indoctrinating” kids about gender and sex isn’t the same as setting them up to be sexually assaulted. Which is what grooming is.
I made this point in my first post to you and you were like "nah frick that it's not that."
quote:
Morally, I think It’s wrong to intentionally associate people with pedophilia because you don’t like them. I think The same posters who hold trans and gays to this standard turn a blind eye to other large well documented groups with known pedophilia issues. If this was about the kids we’d be fleeing the churches in mass and calling all priest pastor or teachers groomers.
Society is not exactly shy at this point in connecting organized religion to abuse. It's major news regularly, and gleefully so. The one "outlet" covering teachers bragging about indoctrinating kids on gender/sexuality was doxxed and then shut down and the only media coverage is to express disdain for spreading the own words of the abusers.
As a reference point, do you think it's morally wrong to tell 7 year olds that men can get pregnant and that thinking otherwise is bigoted or backwards?
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:53 pm to pankReb
quote:You truly ARE a drooling imbecile.
You and him have the same general misunderstanding of the word "No" apparently.
At no point did I say that I approved of his actions in either encounter.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:56 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
You truly ARE a drooling imbecile.
At no point did I say that I approved of his actions in either encounter.
I never said you did, you absolute idiot.
Posted on 7/22/22 at 12:57 pm to pankReb
quote:You equate (a) reading stories to kids in a public library with (b) violent anal rape in a filthy restroom.
"He was just trying to get both of them comfortable with his lifestyle."
Not only are you an imbecile, you are a strange one.
Page 18 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News