- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sidney Powell VINDICATED on all accounts by the Texas Court of Appeals
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:54 pm to LuckyTiger
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:54 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
Tell me your definition.
I don't have one. It's not my term.
The biggest hurdle for those who like to use it is related to legitimacy. When they start attacking legitimacy blindly, it devolves down into a "It's lawfare when done to my team, but not lawfare when my team does it to the out-group". That's basically the general definition of its use by the MAGA sect (and why they give definitions so rarely and defend the rare offerings even less often).
1
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
even though this happened in April she was still required to provide all her finances to Dominion's lawyers (the voting machine people, not O&G company) by Dec. 6th. Which is why April and Dec are relevant.
quote:It's related only in the timing. The deadline to open up her books was Dec. 6
The 2 don't seem very related at all.
Hence the rehash on X.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 9:59 pm to Breaux
quote:
Kraken surely to be released now, right?
The Kraken was released
There are millions of missing voters. Baton Rouge has a white Repub mayor
The DIMs lost the WH, the Senate, and soon more of the Supreme Court
All because people realized the '20 election and the pandemic that allowed was for the sole purpose of ousting Trump. It backfired bigly
Next to the term Kraken on Wikipedia there is simply just a graphic of the '24 election results
Posted on 12/8/24 at 10:06 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
The Kraken was released
Update: this is wrong.
quote:
Next to the term Kraken on Wikipedia there is simply just a graphic of the '24 election results
How could Sydney Powell claim to have the 2024 election results in 2021?
Posted on 12/8/24 at 10:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
When they start attacking legitimacy blindly, it devolves down into a "It's lawfare when done to my team, but not lawfare when my team does it to the out-group"
Can you provide an example of law fare conducted by our team? It seems to be a one sided affair
Does it not interest you at all that every case brought against Trump has completely fallen apart or been dismissed?
This post was edited on 12/8/24 at 10:22 pm
Posted on 12/8/24 at 10:37 pm to Paddyshack
quote:
Can you provide an example of law fare conducted by our team?
All the Kraken lawsuits after the 2020 election
That should not be controversial. It fits multiple definitions.
Coordinated abuse of the legal system for political gain. All illegitimate (in some cases illegal). Large quantity (for Rebels new definition).
Posted on 12/8/24 at 10:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
why do you embarrass yourself like this?
it's a very weird kink.
it's a very weird kink.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 10:44 pm to Rebel
quote:
why do you embarrass yourself like this?
I'm not?
If people have an issue with my example, they have an issue with how the term has been defined (not by me), which is agreeing with my larger point.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 10:46 pm to Rebel
quote:
why do you embarrass yourself like this? it's a very weird kink.
Dude is rolling up on 500k posts......crazy shite man.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 6:20 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
it will give her and lebron more time to find racist spray painters and the Kraken.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 6:31 am to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
She is a grifter and a turncoat..but good for her, I guess.
Look at this idiot make a fool of himself! Self awareness is not your strong suit is it?
Posted on 12/9/24 at 6:37 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Great, now she can release the Kraken.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 6:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
All the Kraken lawsuits after the 2020 election That should not be controversial. It fits multiple definitions. Coordinated abuse of the legal system for political gain. All illegitimate (in some cases illegal). Large quantity (for Rebels new definition).
This is why people don’t take you seriously.
Filing lawsuits to challenge an election is not lawfare, by any definition. And even if you think it is, democrats are the kings of challenging elections.
So again I ask, when has “our team”weaponized the legal system to target specific individuals or entities to cause financial or political harm?
Posted on 12/9/24 at 6:56 am to Paddyshack
quote:
Filing lawsuits to challenge an election is not lawfare, by any definition.
OK, so now we have yet another definition. All version of lawfare must have an exception for filing lawsuits to challenge an election, for...reasons.
I'll add it to the ever-growing list.
quote:
So again I ask, when has “our team”weaponized the legal system to target specific individuals or entities to cause financial or political harm?
I literally just gave you an example of doing that for political harm.
Specifically "weaponizing the legal system" to "target an entity" to "cause political harm".
How do bullshite lawsuits with no evidence or legal justification specifically to "cause political harm" NOT fall into that definition?
quote:
And even if you think it is, democrats are the kings of challenging elections.
It's only lawfare if the out-group does it in real time
Posted on 12/9/24 at 7:01 am to This GUN for HIRE
quote:
quote:
It is unamerican and called Lawfare, although some on this board do not understand Lawfare.
====
They understand it. They enjoy it.
And you know how powerful it can be when you observe the DEMOCRATs quake in their boots at the mere THOUGHT it could be used against THEM.
If fact, they are more fearful of the ACTUAL law be upheld wrt to their wicked past activities. They are all culpable.
And they KNOW it - and it haunts their nightmares.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 7:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Specifically "weaponizing the legal system" to "target an entity" to "cause political harm".
Which is exactly what shitlib progressives tried to do to the cheeto for years while you cheered every effort and he stuffed all of it up your asses. Enjoy the next 4 years
Posted on 12/9/24 at 7:16 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
All the Kraken lawsuits after the 2020 election
Were any of these "Kraken" lawsuits headed by a federal, state, or local government employee? Or headed up an appointee of a federal, state, or local governmental employee?
Was the DOD or DOJ involved in any way with the cases against Trump?
Was the DOD or DOJ involved in any way with the cases FOR Trump?
There is no equivalency in this that some, like yourself, would like there to be.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 7:21 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
while you cheered every effort
Why lie?
Not having an emotional meltdown and maintaining a rational analytical state is not "cheering".
Posted on 12/9/24 at 7:22 am to Dock Holiday
quote:
Were any of these "Kraken" lawsuits headed by a federal, state, or local government employee? Or headed up an appointee of a federal, state, or local governmental employee?
Was the DOD or DOJ involved in any way with the cases against Trump?
Was the DOD or DOJ involved in any way with the cases FOR Trump?
So you're limiting lawfare to federal-criminal proceedings? That's your definition?
I think that's a new one to add to the list if you can confirm.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 7:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
OK, so now we have yet another definition. All version of lawfare must have an exception for filing lawsuits to challenge an election, for...reasons. I'll add it to the ever-growing list.
Maybe you should learn to read. Nobody added another definition. I told you that your idiotic example of “our team” doing ISNT lawfare. That’s not adding a definition, if anything it’s narrowing the definition.
quote:
Specifically "weaponizing the legal system" to "target an entity" to "cause political harm".
Challenging an election with innumerable issues is not weaponizing the legal system. And by the way, the legal system wouldn’t even allow him to do it. No standing for 95% of his lawsuits.
quote:
It's only lawfare if the out-group does it in real time
I said it wasn’t lawfare but if YOU (specifically you who brought up the dumb example) think it is, then democrats are the kings of election challenging.
I’m just glad you’re finally making headway in figuring out what lawfare is and that it actually exists. You’ve had a sudden epiphany it appears.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News