- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SIAP: Democrats indicate they may not certify Trump election if he wins: Report
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:54 am
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:54 am
quote:
Multiple House Democrats have indicated that they might not certify the 2024 presidential election results if former President Donald Trump wins. Political analysts have warned that Democrat lawmakers could try to use the 14th Amendment to object to the certification of a Trump electoral win by labeling him ineligible as an insurrectionist if the Supreme Court does not issue a definitive ruling prior to the election.
quote:
According to The Atlantic, Democratic Reps. Adam Schiff (Calif.), Eric Swalwell (Calif.), Jamie Raskin (Md.), James Clyburn (S.C.), and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies (N.Y.) have refused to commit to confirming the 2024 election results if Trump wins in a potential rematch election against President Joe Biden.
quote:
Additionally, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) told The Atlantic that she “might be” one of the Democratic lawmakers who would push for the former president to be disqualified from holding office again; however, while Lofgren said she thinks Trump is “clearly ineligible, she described the process of challenging elections results as “very murky” and warned, “there’s no procedure, per se, for challenging on this basis.”
quote:
While Schiff did not commit to certifying the election results if Trump is president, he told The Atlantic that he would not object if the Supreme Court declares Trump eligible for the 2024 election. He added that he did not “want to get into the chaos hypothetical” of what might happen if the Supreme Court does not issue a decision ahead of the election.
https://americanmilitarynews.com/2024/02/democrats-indicate-they-may-not-certify-trump-election-if-he-wins-report/
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:55 am to loogaroo
Isn’t their argument that Trump questioning certification of the 2020 vote is insurrection?
I guess they have to be that flexible to fit their heads up their asses regularly.
I guess they have to be that flexible to fit their heads up their asses regularly.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:56 am to loogaroo
quote:
f the Supreme Court does not issue a definitive ruling prior to the election.
They are relieved from this burden. SCOTUS's decision was as definitive as it gets.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:56 am to loogaroo
Joe Biden can still win this election if Kamala Harris has the courage...
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:56 am to Don Quixote
It's the Dem playbook. Accuse your opponent of doing the very thing you're doing. In this case, threatening democracy.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:56 am to loogaroo
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEEEEEEEEASE try this, you fking Pedophiles.....PLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAASEEEEEEEEEEEE....
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:56 am to loogaroo
Well, that mean the GOP has to control the House in 2025.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:56 am to loogaroo
Wouldn’t that make them Insurrectionists?
This post was edited on 3/4/24 at 9:58 am
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:57 am to loogaroo
But you have to certify the electors you are given, regardless of whether or not they were obtained by legal process according to state laws.
- Dems circa 2020
- Dems circa 2020
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:59 am to loogaroo
The real danger to the Republic of America folks. It's all within and Obama is working hard to fundamentally change America.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 9:59 am to ezride25
First, the Democrats will have to recover from Chicago burning during their convention.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:01 am to teke184
quote:
Isn’t their argument that Trump questioning certification of the 2020 vote is insurrection?
It's really about the fake electors his lawyers organized in several states to cause confusion.
Maybe a little about demanding the previous certification be stopped as well
Either way we're just destroying our institutions and faith in the system. I hope democrats take the high road here and not stoop to the undemocratic ways of Republicans
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:01 am to loogaroo
Sounds like a the biggest threat to democracy of our time to me.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:03 am to loogaroo
Keep fighting for democracy, libs.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:03 am to loogaroo
We must destroy democracy because Drumpf is a threat to democracy. Make it make sense.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:04 am to loogaroo
I hope they do because they’re all on video saying that’s bad and can’t be done.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:04 am to loogaroo
Well, that beats another lethal virus.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:06 am to GeauxLSUGeaux
When Republicans do it it's insurrection. When Democrats do it it's "saving democracy". That's the rule.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:07 am to RCDfan1950
Raheem Kassam just told Bannon they are absolutely planning to do this especially now with this SCOTUS ruling.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News