- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should citizens who are receiving government assistance be allowed to have new children?
Posted on 10/5/25 at 9:31 pm to stout
Posted on 10/5/25 at 9:31 pm to stout
quote:But we can stipulate that if you have another one on govt assistance that we aren’t paying for it
We can't constitutionally stop them
0
Posted on 10/5/25 at 9:35 pm to weagle1999
Pro Life are we?
Posted on 10/5/25 at 9:40 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Sally, see what I mean And this poster is talking irreversible birth control…
Well, that ain't me. Irreversible BC is a bridge too far. There are many other things that could be reasonably done. Job training, financial literacy education, incentives for effective BC, curb stomping deadbeat dads, capping assistance payouts, capping time spent on assistance... but never permanently removing the ability to bring forth life.
Posted on 10/5/25 at 9:44 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Pro Life are we?
I'm pro life and also am favorable to workable solutions to limit procreation while on government assistance.
The inevitable problem of mooching off taxpayers is that taxpayers eventually start to think maybe they have a place in helping you make life decisions seeing as how they're paying for it.
Posted on 10/5/25 at 9:45 pm to Asharad
quote:
And y'all wonder why we get compared to Nazis. Lol
For having rules to receive government handouts?
Posted on 10/5/25 at 9:47 pm to weagle1999
No.
Maybe old children, but not new ones
Maybe old children, but not new ones
Posted on 10/5/25 at 9:47 pm to hansenthered1
quote:
So if you have 3 kids and need gov assistance you...don't get it because you have 3 kids? If you face divorce and become a single parent of 2 kids you should not get assistance?
The solution is easy. It’s right in front of of you.
(No government assistance for anyone)
Posted on 10/5/25 at 9:55 pm to hansenthered1
I like my idea better:
Sterilize any person convicted of murder or attempted murder or any other similar violent crime.
Sterilize any person convicted of murder or attempted murder or any other similar violent crime.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 6:10 am to SallysHuman
So we can tell farmers no kids if you accept bail out money?
That is a form of government assistance
That is a form of government assistance
Posted on 10/6/25 at 6:17 am to KiwiHead
quote:
So we can tell farmers no kids if you accept bail out money?
That is a form of government assistance
The types of assistance farmers receive is quite different than actual welfare queens. I know you know this.
Also, farmers are a net positive to society... we ALL have one thing in common, we need to eat.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 6:44 am to weagle1999
NO.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 12:24 pm to SallysHuman
Farmers are bigger welfare queens as a group . The amount of subsidies they get is pretty impressive.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 12:42 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Farmers are bigger welfare queens as a group . The amount of subsidies they get is pretty impressive.
Their contribution to society is impressive too.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:12 pm to weagle1999
Absolutely NOT.
They should only be allowed to have OLD children.
They should only be allowed to have OLD children.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:13 pm to weagle1999
Sure. But they shouldn’t be allowed to vote.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:15 pm to weagle1999
No and if you apply for assistance after the first on you should have to have a letter from an OB/GYN proving that you have had your tubes tied before you get your first check.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:15 pm to Tiger in Texas
quote:
EVERY woman on welfare should be on automatic birth control!!
Impossible to police
But making all forms of female birth control free might get you somewhere
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:17 pm to weagle1999
quote:
Should citizens who are receiving government assistance be allowed to have new children?
My personal opinion? Absolutely not.
My "but this is America" opinion, yes they can have children, but the government assistance does not increase and is eventually eliminated after a certain period of time (max of 2-3 years).
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:21 pm to weagle1999
quote:
Should citizens who are receiving government assistance be allowed to have new children?
Allowed? What country is this?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:23 pm to weagle1999
At the very least they should reduce assistance for each subsequent child now they would never do this as it would affect the children but the current system has no incentive for ghetto queens to stop popping out crotch goblins.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News