- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sex offenders per million- women, men, trans women - it’s what you know to be true
Posted on 3/23/25 at 2:34 am to prplngldtigr
Posted on 3/23/25 at 2:34 am to prplngldtigr
All deserve a death sentence. Can we agree on that?
0
Posted on 3/23/25 at 3:37 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
The Grok analysis comes up with a much lower number of Trans peeps, but it is still much higher than the others.
I wonder if Grok is using a more expansive definition of trans than should be used?
I ask because it seems to me that lately, the claimed number of trans has been getting inflated by all of the different flavors of "non-binary". Basically, calling everyone who isn't just 100% straight some kind of "trans".
But, I don't really think that's the correct number to use because let's face it. The OBVIOUS dude who calls himself "non-binary" because some days, he feels girlish..................but running around calling himself Sally and presenting as a girl really ain't in the same denominator.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:16 am to prplngldtigr
Now do female school teachers.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 4:57 am to AggieHank86
quote:No.
Well, a Twitter user called "End Wokeness" typed it out, so it simply MUST be true.
But isn't it odd that there are no major studies examining the issue?
In fact, I find it extremely odd.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 5:33 am to prplngldtigr
Inaccurate, but GROK does still come up with a number (710, i think) that's twice as high as men.
This post was edited on 3/23/25 at 5:34 am
Posted on 3/23/25 at 5:36 am to Grumpy Nemesis
Agreed, there is a plus or minus factor going on here, but no amount of number massaging is going to have the trans number dip down to the single digit level of women.
Maybe 710 is still too high, but you're not getting it down to 3.
Maybe 710 is still too high, but you're not getting it down to 3.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 5:47 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
But isn't it odd that there are no major studies examining the issue?
Had not thought of this before - but yes - extremely odd.
Especially since there is a 'study' for any other obtuse objective imaginable as long as it promotes some leftist ideology.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:31 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Well, a Twitter user called "End Wokeness" typed it out, so it simply MUST be true.
Friend,
I think if you could find JC your life would become much better, you are lost.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:37 am to supadave3
quote:
That’s absurdly high but all trannys are sexual deviants
Not all. But many sexual deviants use it as cover
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:47 am to prplngldtigr
They are also generally poorer than average and are more violent.
Trans people should be in mental institutions not running wild on our streets
Trans people should be in mental institutions not running wild on our streets
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:52 am to prplngldtigr
Women at only 3 per million seems low. That would be only 504 in the entire country. No way.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:55 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:
Trans people should be in mental institutions not running wild on our streets
Well, in their search for victimhood, studies were done showing the statistics for suicide and suicide attempts. This obviously showing that there is something wrong with these people.
The people that want to argue that it is not 700% more, it is just 300% more….this argument is laughable. These types have mental issues. Accept it and we can all move on.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:56 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
But isn't it odd that there are no major studies examining the issue
Per ChatGPT:
There is very little reliable data on the percentage of sex offenders who are transgender. Studies on sex offenses typically do not break down offenders by gender identity in a meaningful way, and transgender individuals make up a very small percentage of the overall population (estimated at around 0.5–1.6% in the U.S.), which makes statistical analysis challenging.
Most research indicates that the vast majority of sex offenses are committed by cisgender men. While transgender individuals are often disproportionately targeted as victims of violence and sexual assault, there is no credible evidence to suggest that they are more likely to commit sex offenses compared to the general population.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:57 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
But isn't it odd that there are no major studies examining the issue?
Had not thought of this before - but yes - extremely odd.
Especially since there is a 'study' for any other obtuse objective imaginable as long as it promotes some leftist ideology.
Maybe, if we could get USAID to fund this research into the sexual abuse of Trans people, we could get the left to get behind all of the USAID cuts and stop demonizing Musk.
Might be worth a try.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 6:59 am to imjustafatkid
The main problem is how trans sex offenders are classified. Some maybe classified as female and others male rather trans. Remember how some people of color were being classified as white. My guess is the number is somewhere between the grok number and the other, but closer to the higher.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 7:03 am to AggieHank86
quote:Do you scrutinize left leaning media with the same vigor? Is your default setting to question left leaning media like it is with right leaning media?
Well, a Twitter user called "End Wokeness" typed it out, so it simply MUST be true.
I’m going to monitor it. I have a feeling you are not even handed with this.
This post was edited on 3/23/25 at 7:05 am
Posted on 3/23/25 at 7:07 am to AlwysATgr
quote:
wonder what it is for homoseszuals?
DV among the gays is super high as well
Posted on 3/23/25 at 7:17 am to 4cubbies
quote:Right.
There is very little reliable data on the percentage of sex offenders who are transgender.
quote:
But isn't it odd that there are no major studies examining the issue
Posted on 3/23/25 at 7:21 am to Azkiger
quote:Yeah. I think 710 is the low end when you count basically every weirdo that exists and throw them in the trans bucket.
Maybe 710 is still too high, but you're not getting it down to 3.
Posted on 3/23/25 at 7:28 am to prplngldtigr
IDK if that’s true. But it wouldn’t shock me.
I think a lot of trans people have had some kind of trauma in their past - likely as children. People that were abused at a younger age are more likely to be pedophiles or a propensity towards sexually abusive behavior.
Jerry Sandusky is a good example. He was not trans but he was abused as a child in Westmoreland PA. The once victim became the reprehensible monster as he grew older. No fixing it either - monsters like that need prison for life or death.
I think a lot of trans people have had some kind of trauma in their past - likely as children. People that were abused at a younger age are more likely to be pedophiles or a propensity towards sexually abusive behavior.
Jerry Sandusky is a good example. He was not trans but he was abused as a child in Westmoreland PA. The once victim became the reprehensible monster as he grew older. No fixing it either - monsters like that need prison for life or death.
This post was edited on 3/23/25 at 7:30 am
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News