Started By
Message

re: Sentenced to Life for an Accident Miles Away

Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:11 pm to
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61380 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Did someone die during this DUI?


It doesn’t matter. Don’t do the crime if you aren’t ready to do life without parole. That seems to be the consensus here.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

doesn’t matter. Don’t do the crime if you aren’t ready to do life without parole. That seems to be the consensus here


Conservative virtue signaling
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61380 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

You people are just talking shite because you think being tough on crime is what alphas do.

It’s laughably transparent. And dim witted. Virtue signaling for conservatives.


I suspect that if almost anyone else would have started this thread, the responses would be much different.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

I suspect that if almost anyone else would have started this thread, the responses would be much different.


And half the threads this year have been about draconian overreach of the state, ie lawfare. Where is the consistency?
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
21450 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

It’s truly one of the cruellest ideas in the American legal system,” he said of felony murder. “And most people don’t even know it exists.”


I’d argue that’s bullshite. Most people are well aware of the fact that if someone dies during the commission of a crime you can be charged with murder even if you didn’t pull the trigger or drive the car.

The two idiots were breaking into cars when they were caught. Fleeing the scene is just a continuation of the crime and someone died 12 miles away as a result.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Fleeing the scene is just a continuation of the crime and someone died 12 miles away as a result.


You would have a reasonable argument if not for the fact that only one person fled.

Although for the record I’m not real keen on giving cops license to mow people down to catch a floor matt thief.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
48392 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

floor matt thief


Oh look, we have another one who is significantly downplaying this like it's some harmless, victimless crime. He's a thief who would never make a positive contribution to society. Thieves are worthless and should be shot. We are way, way, way too kind to criminals in this country.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13464 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Ever get a DUI? That’s way more dangerous than what this person did. Life without parole!


If someone gets killed as a result of you driving under the influence, yes, that's likely the sentence you'll get.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Oh look, we have another one who is significantly downplaying this like it's some harmless, victimless crime. He's a thief who would never make a positive contribution to society. Thieves are worthless and should be shot. We are way, way, way too kind to criminals in this country.


Conservative virtue signaling

Or

You’re the kind of person the founders felt we needed protection from when they drafted the 8th amendment.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13464 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

This is within the bounds of the law. This discussion is about whether or not this is truly logical or should be considered justice.


Um, yeah.

That's what I am speaking to.

I've asked you this—what, 4 times now, using at least two different analogies? I'll try again, without an analogy: Someone is behaving criminally and another innocent person dies as a result of that criminal behavior.

It's justice for no consequences to be attached to that?

If your answer is "yes," BTW, then I will stop responding, because there's no reasoning with that.
This post was edited on 12/13/23 at 2:36 pm
Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
14669 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Although for the record I’m not real keen on giving cops license to mow people down to catch a floor matt thief.


It's a good thing that literally didn't happen.
Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
14669 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

You’re the kind of person the founders felt we needed protection from when they drafted the 8th amendment.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13464 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

The main difference being in that case you're actually killing the person


Not necessarily with reckless endangerment.

And not even necessarily with a DUI. You could distract someone to the point that they run themselves off the road or hit another vehicle.
Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
14669 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

I suspect that if almost anyone else would have started this thread, the responses would be much different.


Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61380 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

I’d argue that’s bullshite. Most people are well aware of the fact that if someone dies during the commission of a crime you can be charged with murder even if you didn’t pull the trigger or drive the car.


1. This wasn’t a murder because it wasn’t premeditated.

2. The person was in police custody when the cyclists were killed and had no knowledge that his accomplice would evade arrest.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13464 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:38 pm to
quote:


1. This wasn’t a murder because it wasn’t premeditated.


Look up the legal definition of felony murder. And don't attempt any nonsense about arguing against the validity of the law...you're quibbling over legal definitions here, so the definition applies.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61380 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

Someone is behaving criminally and another innocent person dies as a result of that criminal behavior.


Are you insinuating that’s what happened here? I don’t understand the relevance. No one died because Baxter broke into cars.

Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35926 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

It's a good thing that literally didn't happen.


True. I was thinking the cop killed the cyclist in pursuit.

Still, the one person who didn’t kill the cyclist was the guy who immediately surrendered.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61380 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

True. I was thinking the cop killed the cyclist in pursuit.


IMO the cops are more culpable than Baxter.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13464 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

They didn’t conspire to kill the cyclists though. Everyone involved in the prosecution agrees that was unintentional.


So what?

Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20 21 22 ... 31
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 31Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram