Started By
Message

re: Seemingly lost in all this Iran BS is they refused to stop developing nukes….

Posted on 3/8/26 at 2:01 pm to
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76384 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 2:01 pm to
Very much possible.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76384 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 2:05 pm to
What’s wrong with that WH release slo? Please explain? If I say I obliterated the fort that is what I did. I did not say I obliterated ALL forts.
Posted by geoag58
Member since Nov 2011
2106 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 2:06 pm to
You have trouble with comprehension.

Trump saying facilities obliterated and Iran continues trying to develop nuclear weapon are not the same thing.
Posted by geoag58
Member since Nov 2011
2106 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Therefore, what would you propose as an alternative seeing what has and what hasn’t worked thus far?


I wish I had a nickel for every time that putz has been asked this question.
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
15097 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 4:32 pm to
They might have been.
You missed my point.
We don’t go to war for that.
It’s an excuse for another reason.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476304 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

wish I had a nickel for every time that putz has been asked this question.

I'm not going to make y'all feel better about your hypocrisy
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90422 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 4:39 pm to
Irrelevant!
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
20222 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

I don’t think there is a sane person alive who thinks Iran should be allowed to have nukes


Lots of people have nukes I don't want having nukes. Should we invade all of them?

quote:

this bombing campaign and push for regime change has been the only option left for some time and time had run out


the only option left? how about leave them the frick alone? that's an option. Since when has Iran posed a threat to the US, with or without a nuke?
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
20222 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

horrible but necessary


necessary for what?

Other than to destabilize the region and piss off our actual allies who depend on us for protection, allow us to build bases on their soil, invest billions and billions into the economy, and don't blow up our ships, why was this "necessary?"
Posted by ponyman
Member since Nov 2019
502 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 5:09 pm to
This is not about nukes. It's about the Greater Israel Project.
Posted by rltiger
Metairie
Member since Oct 2004
2425 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

Lots of people have nukes I don't want having nukes. Should we invade all of them?
This action is to keep an unstable regime from acquiring Nukes. There is a reason the overwhelming majority of middle east countries are backing and supporting US and Israel strikes.

For your information, here are the countries with Nuclear Weapons….
The United States, Russia, France, China, the United Kingdom, Pakistan, India, Israel, and North Korea.

quote:

Since when has Iran posed a threat to the US, with or without a nuke?
Again, were are trying to keep them from acquiring a nuclear weapon. They are a threat to stability in the world if they ever acquire nukes. It instantly destabilizes that area and every country in the area will want nukes to counter the Iranians. Within a year the probability of one popping off goes up a thousandfold.

I for one don’t want that.

Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
11280 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 5:45 pm to
Two weeks away
Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
11280 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

Lots of people have nukes I don't want having nukes. Should we invade all of them?


We don’t invade countries with nukes because they have nukes, which is why countries that don’t have nukes want nukes.
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
11113 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

I missed the part where they developed a nuke. You seem to be implying the attacks didn’t work.


Obliterated doesn't mean as much nowadays.

But look, this attack, this attack is gonna stop them.
Posted by Asharad
Tiamat
Member since Dec 2010
6343 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

necessary for what?
The answer was in my post.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39799 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

I missed the part where they developed a nuke. You seem to be implying the attacks didn’t work.



They have been six months away from developing a nuke for several decades now. At least according to Bibi.
Posted by Stat M Repairman
Member since Jun 2023
2746 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

I missed the part where they developed a nuke.


Confirmation that they developed a nuke will come in the form of a big flash.
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
20215 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

God Dam SlowFappingPro is all giddy!


If she has a chance to take a shot at the USA and if it’s bad for America, she’s in.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13386 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 11:10 pm to
quote:

Yeah we told you the bombing last year wouldn't stop them and was nothing more than a speed bump long-term.

Didn't stop people from pounding their chest and proclaiming victory.


Yeah?

So?

Are you o.k. with Iran getting nuclear weapons?

Because it doesn't sound like you were opposed to the bombing last year because you wanted a more permanent solution. It sounds like you were opposed just for the sake of opposing it. Because now you don't seem happy about a more permanent solution either.

I personally think it would be a very bad thing if Iran—with their current fundamentalist theocracy—ever got working nukes.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13386 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 11:10 pm to
quote:

They have been six months away from developing a nuke for several decades now


All that means is that this is several decades over due.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram