- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Secretaries of Swing States in MI, AZ, WI, MI, PA, and GA coordinating to fight MAGA
Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:01 pm to David_DJS
Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:01 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Why would I address the notion that a group of SOSs "colluding" to respond to similar lawsuits is sedition? It's nonsensical.
I’m not sure, as I never put forth that “notion.” That’s why attempting to connect your post, as a response to something that I didn’t state, is moronic.
I must say that I find your refusal to admit that you’re wrong is fascinating.
Reading comprehension must not be your stretch.
1
Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:12 pm to TigerVespamon
What makes anyone think Trump has a chance of winning? How much more proof of the Dems/Deep State's treachery does one need to see the steal is already set in motion?
Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:25 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
I must say that I find your refusal to admit that you’re wrong is fascinating.
I'm more than happy to acknowledge when I've been wrong about something in these threads. I've done it before without hesitation.
quote:
Reading comprehension must not be your stretch.
Okay, so it boils down to this. You responded to a question with "Sedition?" - that actual post (yours) went like this -
quote:
quote:
What crime did she commit?
--------
Sedition?
Are you telling me it's poor reading comprehension on my part to read that short exchange and surmise that you were suggesting that the MI SOS may have been committing sedition?
Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:37 pm to ItzMe1972
Compact Clause violation?
Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:39 pm to ItzMe1972
A literal attack on democracy
Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:43 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
What crime did she commit?
She admitted to a conspiracy to rig the election at worst and at best admitted meetings with bias against one candidate being had with leaders in other swing states.
Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:45 pm to ItzMe1972
Democracy in action 
Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:54 pm to David_DJS
quote:
What crime did she commit?
quote:
Sedition?
quote:
Are you telling me it's poor reading comprehension on my part to read that short exchange and surmise that you were suggesting that the MI SOS may have been committing sedition?
No.
However, the part where I explained what was meant by that post does.
Posted on 3/6/24 at 9:57 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Sedition?
Which begs the question that a group of colluding SS may have ulterior motives.
Only time will tell.
May have…not does have.
Again, your defense of the conspirators does not apply to my scenario, as your post is present tense.
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:13 pm to ItzMe1972
Soros has been busy.
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:14 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
However, the part where I explained what was meant by that post does.
quote:
Again, your defense of the conspirators does not apply to my scenario, as your post is present tense.
It's idiocy to suggest that SOSs "colluding" in response to similar lawsuits filed in their respective states can be anything close to sedition. It's not illegal. You've got to fantasize all sorts of things to arrive at SOSs working together to respond to lawsuits being criminal/seditious.
And lol @ "conspirators"
Question - when a group of state AGs get together to respond to something the fedgov has done that they don't agree with, is that sedition, too? For example, when the South Dakota AG (and others) joined with the Texas AG in the legal jousting over Biden's open border, did you agree with whacko liberals that they were seditious in their actions?
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:17 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Playing devil's advocate, it's not a crime for SOSs to coordinate. Just like it's not a crime for state AGs or governors to coordinate certain efforts.
You still arguing Lake lost fair and square?
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:19 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Soros has been busy.
That Satan incarnate just got a prog DA unseated and replaced by an even worse one who literally campaigned on leniency. Harris County is fricked.
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:22 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
That Satan incarnate just got a prog DA unseated and replaced by an even worse one who literally campaigned on leniency. Harris County is fricked.
That blows my mind she wasn’t towing the line enough. He really wants all criminals released.
This post was edited on 3/7/24 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:28 pm to loogaroo
quote:
You still arguing Lake lost fair and square?
Do you still believe the cartels have bought millions of dollars of real estate for elected officials and judges in Arizona?
Not that reality matters to you, but I never argued any election was fair/square because I'm of the belief there's cheating in every election of consequence. What I've argued -
The BO tabulators disenfranchising tens of thousands of KL voters was utter nonsense. And it was.
KL's legal team was trash, and they proved me right.
That the real election fraud issues are ballot custody and signature verification. And they are.
I also argued that Kari Lake ran a retarded race and lost a layup of an election. And she did.
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:31 pm to ItzMe1972
Speechless.
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:34 pm to David_DJS
But you think the one over seeing the election winning is crystal clean? She refused to investigate signatures.
Yes, we all know Kemp did the same In GA. I didn’t agree with it then and didn’t with Hobbs.
Yes, we all know Kemp did the same In GA. I didn’t agree with it then and didn’t with Hobbs.
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:36 pm to David_DJS
quote:
? For example, when the South Dakota AG (and others) joined with the Texas AG in the legal jousting over Biden's open border, did you agree with whacko liberals that they were seditious in their actions?
Stop the gaslighting bullshite...The AG's were banning together over treasonous , illegal actions of a mentally deficient fake POTUS puppet allowing an invasion from our southern border, a border which he has sworn to defend...not even remotely the same thing as these SOS's fighting their "common enemy" wink-wink.. and you fricking know it..stop with the upside down word salad.
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:42 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
But you think the one over seeing the election winning is crystal clean? She refused to investigate signatures.
Lake's legal team fricked that up royally. What they petitioned the court to do did not allow for the investigation of signatures. The infamous clown verifying signatures in less than 3 seconds, that never became a thing because of Kari Lake's own legal team.
As a simple matter of propriety, I agree with you that a SOS should not oversee an election involving him/herself.
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:44 pm to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
these SOS's fighting their "common enemy" wink-wink.. and you fricking know it..stop with the upside down word salad.
It's this part that I don't agree with.
What exactly do you think they're doing or planning to do?
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News