- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Secretaries of Swing States in MI, AZ, WI, MI, PA, and GA coordinating to fight MAGA
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:59 pm to David_DJS
Posted on 3/6/24 at 10:59 pm to David_DJS
quote:
It's idiocy to suggest that SOSs "colluding" in response to similar lawsuits filed in their respective states
Do you have specific knowledge that this is all they were discussing? Link? I skipped 8 pages.
I think a. Itizen should sue and get all the records and emails to confirm a complete lack of bias.
Posted on 3/6/24 at 11:09 pm to dafif
quote:
Do you have specific knowledge that this is all they were discussing? Link? I skipped 8 pages.
I'm only going by the interview the OP linked. She describes working together in response to lawsuits they're all seeing.
Posted on 3/7/24 at 7:04 am to David_DJS
quote:
It's idiocy to suggest that SOSs "colluding" in response to similar lawsuits filed in their respective states can be anything close to sedition.
Which is why I didn’t suggest it.
You aren’t very bright sometimes.
quote:
And lol @ "conspirators"
Your tacit support aside, why would you discount that as a future possibility?
Posted on 3/7/24 at 8:00 am to David_DJS
quote:
It's just 6 senior election officials in battleground states colluding to "fight" one of the major party presidential candidates whom they describe as an "adversary." Probably nothing for voters to worry about.
Golly, gosh Dave....Let's see.. 6 ELECTION officials in "swing" battleground states banding together to "fight" President Trump and his campaign, a man they describe as their "adversary." I cannot fathom how this could possibly create a situation that would present an election collusion problem..
HOW MUCH MORE INFO DO YOU ACTUALLY NEED TO SEE A HUGE, UNETHICAL AND POSSIBLY CRIMINAL PROBLEM BY ELECTION OFFICIALS?
Posted on 3/7/24 at 8:09 am to David_DJS
quote:
She describes working together in response to lawsuits they're all seeing
Thanks. However, given the SCOTUS ruling- there is zero need to discuss
And lawsuits were filed in every state. Why just 6 key states with sketchy voting problems and all democrats as SOS?
Again, a citizen should sue and get every record and every discussion and request the case be fast tracked given potential fraud
Posted on 3/7/24 at 2:15 pm to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
HOW MUCH MORE INFO DO YOU ACTUALLY NEED TO SEE A HUGE, UNETHICAL AND POSSIBLY CRIMINAL PROBLEM BY ELECTION OFFICIALS?
I'd need some evidence of them doing something illegal. I don't think it's illegal for state officials to commiserate/work together in any aspect of their jobs. You frame it as them v. Trump, and I get that on a certain level, but the reality is she refers to working together in responding to similar lawsuits filed in their respective states.
My overriding argument is that not only is this "concern" baseless, but it's detrimental to the effort to address actual fraud. I'll use Kari Lake as an example - she ran hard with BO tabulators causing tens of thousands of disenfranchised Lake voters theory because it was an easy sell - not to the courts because it was utter nonsense in reality, but to the millions across the country that lionize and fund her. Meanwhile, her shitty legal team, focused on tabulators and disenfranchised voters, royally fricked up on the best/most legit issue they had in front of them - signature verification.
Posted on 3/7/24 at 2:16 pm to ItzMe1972
Using government resources for partisan political activity is seriously criminal.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News