Started By
Message

Scott Ritter on Ukraine and Finland joining NATO

Posted on 5/12/22 at 11:33 am
Posted by JAGuyHeh
Member since Aug 2021
179 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 11:33 am
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 11:49 am to
Since when has Finland needed help. They've been fighting off Russia since before the U.S. was a dirty thought in Spain's mind.
Posted by Epaminondas
The Boot
Member since Jul 2020
4154 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 1:04 pm to
Why wouldn't Finland want to join NATO?
Trying to join NATO has worked out so well for Ukraine.
Posted by BobABooey
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2004
14261 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

Since when has Finland needed help.

If you believe that NATO in its current form is about protecting member countries from outside aggressors, well, I can’t help you.
Posted by JAGuyHeh
Member since Aug 2021
179 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

Since when has Finland needed help. They've been fighting off Russia since before the U.S. was a dirty thought in Spain's mind.



Not sure what you mean by Spain. And Finland ultimately lost territory to the Soviet Union. They signed a treaty of perpetual neutrality, which the USSR then respected, and Russia has as well. Joining NATO violates the treaty they signed.

There is no need to provoke Russia. Russia has announced it wants Ukraine and Finland as well as other states to be neutral. Why is this bad?
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19689 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Trying to join NATO has worked out so well for Ukraine.
imagine invading a country on your border because you didn't want them to join NATO, failing to conquer that nation, having your military incompetence exposed, having your shitty gear exposed so the other dirtbag countries don't want to buy it anymore, and causing 2 other countries you didn't want to join NATO to immediately join NATO, and then trying to act like you can do anything about it militarily. Invading Ukraine is working out great for Russia
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26202 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

There is no need to provoke Russia. Russia has announced it wants Ukraine and Finland as well as other states to be neutral. Why is this bad?

It is "bad" in the sense that under no circumstances do Russia's preferences rightfully dictate the foreign policy decisions of sovereign nations. Other countries not doing what you want them to do is simply not lawful justification for military aggression.

Once again, Finland and Sweden deciding, in their own prerogative, to join NATO, is demonstrably not "provoking" anything. Throughout NATO's entire existence, not one single member has ever threatened Russia or Russian territory in any meaningful way.

It is a land and power grab by Moscow. Nothing more.

quote:

They signed a treaty of perpetual neutrality, which the USSR then respected, and Russia has as well.

And I am assuming you mean the treaty signed after Russian began yet another war of conquest with no legitimate basis and took Karelia from Finland?
This post was edited on 5/12/22 at 1:44 pm
Posted by JAGuyHeh
Member since Aug 2021
179 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

magine invading a country on your border because you didn't want them to join NATO, failing to conquer that nation, having your military incompetence exposed, having your shitty gear exposed so the other dirtbag countries don't want to buy it anymore, and causing 2 other countries you didn't want to join NATO to immediately join NATO, and then trying to act like you can do anything about it militarily. Invading Ukraine is working out great for Russia


Russia is not losing. Ukraine is losing badly. You'll see when Poland decides to annex Lyiv and parts of western Ukraine. It will be partitioned.

Joining NATO is not an immediate process. You should read up on the treaty and how that actually works.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26202 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

You'll see when Poland decides to annex Lyiv and parts of western Ukraine. It will be partitioned.

Bet.
quote:

Joining NATO is not an immediate process. You should read up on the treaty and how that actually works.


It can be as immediate as the NATO member states want it to be.
Posted by Lynxrufus2012
Central Kentucky
Member since Mar 2020
12149 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 1:46 pm to
Countries have the right to join organizations if they want to. Russia fricked it all up by invading Ukraine the way they did. If Putin had played it smart, sticking to Donbas region, sleepy Joe wouldn't have even noticed it.

Millie to Joe "Russia has invaded Donbas!"
Joe: "Trump says I am a dumbass"
Millie; "Yes you are, but Russia is invading the Donbas region of Ukraine."
Joe: "I think they are like whooping cranes, but I may be wrong. Where is my pudding cup?"
Posted by JAGuyHeh
Member since Aug 2021
179 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

It is "bad" in the sense that under no circumstances do Russia's preferences rightfully dictate the foreign policy decisions of sovereign nations. Other countries not doing what you want them to do is simply not lawful justification for military aggression.



Russia does not want thousands of miles of militarized borders, which is what exactly what would happen if Finland joined.

Finland historically was part of the Russian Empire, the Duchy of Finland.

When I said provoke, I meant the entire NATO expansion operation that the neocons have engineered for decades. NATO originally was not going to expand, but it did anyway. The elites in charge are dishonest at the very least.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26202 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Russia fricked it all up by invading Ukraine the way they did. If Putin had played it smart, sticking to Donbas region, sleepy Joe wouldn't have even noticed it.


This. Russia overplayed their hand, and IMO underestimated the ability of the NATO states to coalesce quickly.

Had they just set out to annex Donbas and establish a corridor to Crimea, this would have been over in days right from the beginning.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26202 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Russia does not want thousands of miles of militarized borders, which is what exactly what would happen if Finland joined.

And yet, nothing Russia wants or doesn't want justifies their attempt to dictate the foreign policy decisions of sovereign nations.
quote:

Finland historically was part of the Russian Empire, the Duchy of Finland.


There is essentially no possible way for this to be less relevant.
quote:

When I said provoke, I meant the entire NATO expansion operation that the neocons have engineered for decades
Oh, so you mean the former Warsaw Pact countries, using their sovereign prerogatives, choosing to apply for NATO membership?
quote:

NATO originally was not going to expand, but it did anyway.

Once again, nothing Russia thinks, wants, or used to have can possibly lawfully dictate what other countries do. It is a ridiculous premise that is even more underscored by the fact that Russia laid down like a bitch when the Baltic states and Poland joined in 2004. They weren't "threatened" then. They are using that excuse now because they feel froggy and need to sell their decision to jump.
This post was edited on 5/12/22 at 1:51 pm
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Not sure what you mean by Spain.

Spain sent Columbus to the Americas?
quote:

There is no need to provoke Russia.

Pretty sure Putin just proved there is a reason, but ultimately the decision lies with Finland, don't you think?
quote:

Joining NATO violates the treaty they signed.

The treaty they signed at the end of a gun? Ok. Sure.
Posted by Lynxrufus2012
Central Kentucky
Member since Mar 2020
12149 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 2:04 pm to
Treaties are made to be broken. Both US and Russia are experts.

Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 2:07 pm to
Ignoring the white guilt barbs, you're right. Treaties are broken all the time.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Finland historically was part of the Russian Empire, the Duchy of Finland.
The Finns were (unwilling) vassals to the Russians for about 100 years. They were an important part of the Swedish Empire for 600 years. Gustav Adolphus used Finnish cavalry as his shock troops, because they were both loyal and true badasses.

When Russia took Finland from Sweden, the Finns became and remained a thorn in the paw of the Russian bear until the Russian revolution allowed them to free themselves.

Their effectiveness against the Russians in the WW2 era gets overstated (IMO), and they DID lose substantial territory to the USSR. But they fought like a mean-assed junkyard dog.
This post was edited on 5/12/22 at 2:23 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

(Finland) signed a treaty of perpetual neutrality, which the USSR then respected .... Joining NATO violates the treaty they signed.
How does one "violate" a treaty with a country which no longer exists?
Posted by TigerOnTheMountain
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
41773 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 2:30 pm to
I’m not clicking your blind link, but I remain skeptical that Finland joins NATO. It just doesn’t make a lot of sense for them to do so.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26202 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

It just doesn’t make a lot of sense for them to do so.

There is effectively zero downside to doing so, not sure why you would hold that opinion.

Finland only gains from the security guarantee.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram