- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scientists continue to debunk theory of evolution
Posted on 11/23/22 at 12:16 pm to TrueTiger
Posted on 11/23/22 at 12:16 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
But another is that our Universe is a computer simulation, with someone (perhaps an advanced alien species) fine-tuning the conditions.
Wouldn’t said advance alien society need to live in a universe tuned for life?
0
Posted on 11/23/22 at 12:31 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
The triune God as revealed in nature and His Word, the Bible.
What about people who live in a different god's universe?
Posted on 11/23/22 at 12:31 pm to TrueTiger
Damn this is stupid.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 12:32 pm to TrueTiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/29/23 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 11/23/22 at 12:32 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
You have cited an interesting alternate theory. It does not “debunk” anything.
Hmm, so no one has debunked God then... Thanks for the clarification.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 12:35 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
Hmm, so no one has debunked God then
Sure, but "you haven't debunked it" isn't exactly strong evidence.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 12:36 pm to BlueJacket
quote:
No Dodge. NDEs are explainable and even able to be reproduced. They don't lead to an existence of your god. Interesting how almost all have experiences that include the god they happen to believe in. Provide a peer reviewed scientific study that concludes that NDEs prove a god exists.
Haven't ignored the ontological arguments. They just don't lead back to a god, much less a specific god. You would still be left with 1000s to choose from even if you could use the ontological argument to get you to a god existing.
Sometimes it is best to just say, I don't know, I will look into it, than to throw up a word salad that simply demonstrates you have no clue what you are talking about.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 12:37 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
You have cited an interesting alternate theory.
And that mere fact is very, very, important.
Because atheists for years have sat back smugly and pointed out that evolution had no alternate scientific competitor.
Now, it does.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 12:43 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:Of course not. It is impossible to disprove the existence of a deity, because Believers will always assert that God underlies any scientific explanation..
You have cited an interesting alternate theory. It does not “debunk” anything.quote:
Hmm, so no one has debunked God then... Thanks for the clarification.
Of course, it IS possible to PROVE the existence of God. He need only make an appearance, but He has declined to do so for unknown reasons.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 12:51 pm to BlueJacket
quote:
I simply am not convinced any god is real based on available evidence. If the time comes when that evidence becomes available, I'll change my mind. I prefer to believe things that can demonstrated to be real, rather than those that cannot.
You should step outside every once in a while, take a look around and give it some thought. Science says you should see entropy and things on their way to entropy. That is not what is out there. Why?
Posted on 11/23/22 at 12:52 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
And that mere fact is very, very, important.
Because atheists for years have sat back smugly and pointed out that evolution had no alternate scientific competitor.
Now, it does.
*Pseudoscientific
This post was edited on 11/23/22 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 11/23/22 at 12:55 pm to BlueJacket
quote:
Macro vs Micro evolution are non-scientific concepts. It's all evolution. Creationists like to create the two categories to allow them some room to appear "scientific". Macro evolution is just micro evolution over a long period of time.
Please link a peer reviewed paper showing evidence of intermediate forms of species to species evolution. I'll wait.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 12:59 pm to LakeCharles
quote:Galapagos finches.
Please link a peer reviewed paper showing evidence of intermediate forms of species to species evolution. I'll wait.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 1:01 pm to LakeCharles
quote:
Please link a peer reviewed paper showing evidence of intermediate forms of species to species evolution. I'll wait.
You're kidding right? There are many many many many "intermediate" (as you call them) fossils.
You could not have failed more on this gotcha
Posted on 11/23/22 at 1:04 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
*Pseudoscientific
I figured this is where the 'follow the science' crowd gets off the science train.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 1:05 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Because atheists for years have sat back smugly and pointed out that evolution had no alternate scientific competitor.
It still doesn't.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 1:06 pm to sumtimeitbeslikedat
Nobody is trying to "disprove God". Scientists have agendas, for sure, but disproving a non-corporal deity would be a ridiculous pursuit for an empiricist, would it not?
Posted on 11/23/22 at 1:06 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Galapagos finches.
Are still finches. They are not turtles or eggplants.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 1:07 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
I figured this is where the 'follow the science' crowd gets off the science train.
Correct. I generally stick to science that follows the scientific method.
The simulation hypothesis is no better than religion.
Posted on 11/23/22 at 1:07 pm to LakeCharles
quote:
Are still finches. They are not turtles or eggplants.
Do you think this is how Evolution works?
Page 5 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News