Scale of Ineligible People for Jury Duty Highlights Number of Illegals on Voter Rolls

It's not an accident the system, from registration through vote counting, is remarkably fraud-friendly.

The sensationalist message is not supported by the sensationalist article. It’s like that game in kindergarten where one kid whispers a message to the next kid around the room, and by the end, the message is completely changed. Except this is adults intentionally lying to each other and changing the lies each time they repeat them.

Thanks for wasting a few minutes of everyone’s life, i guess.

just for you, tboy…

quote:

---

(New Jersey Globe) –

About 75,000 noncitizens are summoned for jury duty in New Jersey each year, based on data from three state government agencies, including the Motor Vehicle Commission — a stunning figure that widens the scope of a growing controversy over government databases that may incorrectly identify noncitizens as eligible voters and jurors.

While the number is alarming, there’s no indication that noncitizens have served on a jury since the judiciary implemented additional guardrails to prevent it. “Prospective jurors are asked about their citizenship and other qualifications when they complete the mandatory juror qualification questionnaire,” said Pete McAleer, a spokesman for the New Jersey Administrative Office of the Courts. “Those who advance are reminded of the eligibility requirements during jury orientation and are directly questioned about their citizenship during jury selection by the judge and, as permitted, the attorneys.”

In between, potential jurors watch a training video that includes the citizenship requirement. The revelation of noncitizens making their way into jury pools comes three days after Gov. Mikie Sherrill disclosed that an alleged software glitch at motor vehicles led to the inclusion of roughly 6,600 noncitizens on New Jersey’s voter rolls; Sherrill blamed the vendor, IDEMIA, and said less than 400 noncitizens have voted in recent elections.

According to McAleer, the judiciary processes more than one million summonses annually for potential jury service and randomly selects records provided from the Division of Elections, the Division of Taxation, and the MVC.

---

quote:

---

If a defendant losses a jury trial and later its found an illegal was on the jury - would it be overturned?

---

Wow! Never thought of this. This could cause some serious problems for the judicial system.

quote:

---

The sensationalist message is not supported by the sensationalist article. It’s like that game in kindergarten where one kid whispers a message to the next kid around the room, and by the end, the message is completely changed. Except this is adults intentionally lying to each other and changing the lies each time they repeat them.

Thanks for wasting a few minutes of everyone’s life, i guess.

---

You didn’t read the article. It supports exactly what the summary claims.

One highlight is that 75,000 illegals disqualified themselves by voluntarily telling the jury system that they did not meet the citizenship qualification.

The district court did not claim to check citizenship at all. It’s on the honor system- just like the voting system. People affirm “under penalty of law” whether or not they are a citizen. Unless the state is one of the few that uses a database to verify, thousands get away with lying and can vote. Nobody verifies.

quote:

---

A lot of typing without explaining how the article is inaccurate.

---

Feelings my man, it's his feelings.

Oh yeah, add in a huge dose of illiberal illogic.

Not showing up for jury duty is usually followed up by the courts, so if an illegal went for jury duty and identified themselves as non-citizens i believe this is what makes them show up on the non-juror list.

Cross referencing this with voter rolls will give you people that identified themselves as non-citizens, but voted anyway.

Democrats, always on the side of criminals, want to defend these people.

So no illegal has ever voted is that you assertion?

Or just in this specific case?

It's like New Jersey never happened!

quote:

---

According to the article, there is no evidence that even a single noncitizen served on a jury. The article does not identify a single noncitizen who voted.

So what is the emergency?

---

The article describes that no one is checking. It makes a compelling case that everything is in place for noncitizens to both serve on a jury and vote if they wanted to. Because no procedure is in place to stop it from happening.

Procedures merely ask a person to affirm whether or not they are eligible. It’s the honor system.

How do you prevent a crime from happening if no one tries to prevent it and no one is trying to identify whether or not a crime happened.

How do you prevent a crime if the only effort is to ask people to promise they did not commit a crime? The result of that is bozos like you claiming such a thing is evidence that no crime has been committed.