- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Sam Harris vs Ben Shapiro debate now posted
Posted on 1/2/18 at 8:33 pm
Posted on 1/2/18 at 8:33 pm
With Eric Weinstein thrown in
Posted earlier today, but I figured the board would be interested in seeing two intellectual heavyweights go after it (although civilly). Thank God we’ve finally skipped the Middle Man that is Cenk.
Posted earlier today, but I figured the board would be interested in seeing two intellectual heavyweights go after it (although civilly). Thank God we’ve finally skipped the Middle Man that is Cenk.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 8:34 pm to OMLandshark
I would give my left nut for Hitchens to have destroyed both those idiots.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 8:36 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
quote:
I would give my left nut for Hitchens to have destroyed both those idiots.
Hitchens did debate Sam Harris on quite a few occasions. Harris didn’t beat him, but no one ever beat Hitchens as far as I’m aware.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 8:44 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
quote:
both those idiots.
C'mon, man. Don't be that guy.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 8:45 pm to OMLandshark
What does the [s]fox[/s] Rubio say?
Posted on 1/2/18 at 8:46 pm to OMLandshark
Why do y'all take Sam Harris seriously? He's an atheist and Ken Ham crushed him in a debate
Posted on 1/2/18 at 8:57 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
He's an atheist
...and is therefore not capable of formulating and conveying a productive thought? I'm not following your line of thinking.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 10:27 pm to victoire sécurisé
Hitch is pretty damn impressive. Him vs Ben would be a good show.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 10:33 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Hitchens did debate Sam Harris on quite a few occasions. Harris didn’t beat him, but no one ever beat Hitchens as far as I’m aware.
The difference them is that Harris, while very intelligent, tries to fit objective morality into a worldview in which objective morality is VERY hard to defend.
Hitchens was a nilhist (albeit a soft one) and naturalistic nilhism is a position immune to the arguments of religious and moral apologetics if carried to its logical conclusion. If you are willing to agree that nothing is truly, objectively immoral then you shut down the religious objections to atheism at the root.
This post was edited on 1/2/18 at 10:35 pm
Posted on 1/2/18 at 10:37 pm to Roger Klarvin
I don’t agree at all that Hitchens was a nihilist and I think he would have a 5 minute rant to anyone who would accuse him of being such. Hitchens has moral principles and was a total egalitarian. I do not think he is remotely a nihilist. His biggest beef is that religious people consider nihilism for the first 80,000 years of human history. It wasn’t until like 3,000 BC before we get a loving god.
This post was edited on 1/2/18 at 10:40 pm
Posted on 1/2/18 at 10:57 pm to Roger Klarvin
I find Harris’ defense of determinism tougher to agree with than objective morality.
Mostly because Harris has no issues waaaay overstepping his bounds in a discussion about the physical world as we currently understand it. I know he’s a very smart individual with a medical background but he’s way off in his application of deterministic behavior of the bits and pieces that make up our physical world.
Mostly because Harris has no issues waaaay overstepping his bounds in a discussion about the physical world as we currently understand it. I know he’s a very smart individual with a medical background but he’s way off in his application of deterministic behavior of the bits and pieces that make up our physical world.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 11:03 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Hitchens was a nilhist
Say what you want about the tenets of National Socialism, Dude. At least it’s a goddamn ethos.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 11:39 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 1/2/18 at 11:43 pm to victoire sécurisé
quote:
I'm not following your line of thinking.
quote:Youre lost on multiple levels and its beautiful
el Gaucho
Posted on 1/3/18 at 12:18 am to OMLandshark
"The difference them is that Harris, while very intelligent, tries to fit objective morality into a worldview in which objective morality is VERY hard to defend.
Hitchens was a nilhist (albeit a soft one) and naturalistic nilhism is a position immune to the arguments of religious and moral apologetics if carried to its logical conclusion. If you are willing to agree that nothing is truly, objectively immoral then you shut down the religious objections to atheism at the root."
"I don’t agree at all that Hitchens was a nihilist and I think he would have a 5 minute rant to anyone who would accuse him of being such. Hitchens has moral principles and was a total egalitarian. I do not think he is remotely a nihilist. His biggest beef is that religious people consider nihilism for the first 80,000 years of human history. It wasn’t until like 3,000 BC before we get a loving god."
And here we have the reason that philosophy is so hated by most people. Dry and ultimately meaningless discussion.
It doesn't matter if someone is a pragmatist, relativist, egalitarian etc. The discussion and where it takes us is what matters.
Hitchens was a nilhist (albeit a soft one) and naturalistic nilhism is a position immune to the arguments of religious and moral apologetics if carried to its logical conclusion. If you are willing to agree that nothing is truly, objectively immoral then you shut down the religious objections to atheism at the root."
"I don’t agree at all that Hitchens was a nihilist and I think he would have a 5 minute rant to anyone who would accuse him of being such. Hitchens has moral principles and was a total egalitarian. I do not think he is remotely a nihilist. His biggest beef is that religious people consider nihilism for the first 80,000 years of human history. It wasn’t until like 3,000 BC before we get a loving god."
And here we have the reason that philosophy is so hated by most people. Dry and ultimately meaningless discussion.
It doesn't matter if someone is a pragmatist, relativist, egalitarian etc. The discussion and where it takes us is what matters.
Posted on 1/3/18 at 5:50 am to OMLandshark
Harris isn't nearly as smart as he imagines himself to be. He refused to answer Shapiro's questions by saying they are not what Harris wants to discuss, but requires Shapiro to answer his. Anyone can win an argument when they determine what a valid question is.
Posted on 1/3/18 at 9:10 am to OMLandshark
This was a very interesting discussion. The back and forth with Ben and Sam on free will, reason, and religion was fascinating. I like Eric Weinstein, but wish he had sat this one out
Posted on 1/3/18 at 9:12 am to OMLandshark
Hitchens v. Shapiro would have been perfect. They're both extremely smart and well-versed with just the right amount of snark mixed in.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 12:33 am to beastieboys
quote:
I like Eric Weinstein, but wish he had sat this one out
Yeah, it was a miscalculation by Sam. People who expand their horizons with multiple viewpoints tend to look at Sam as the brightest the Left has to offer and Ben as the smartest the Right has to offer. Granted them talking was 80% of it, but I hope the next time they debate, it’s just the two of them, since they barely scraped the surface here. I’m sure it will happen again sometime soon since they both praise one another, and neither of them are shy about shitting on another person they don’t like or respect.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 12:54 am to OMLandshark
Can someone tell me why Sam Harris is a thing? I've listened to this, his podcast with Scott Adams, and his conversation with Ben Affleck on Maher's show.
He bested Ben Affleck on why Islam sucks (which isn't much of an accomplishment), he was horribly irrational (due to TDS) when talking with Adams, and he completely dodged Shapiro's larger points while simply attacking aspects of specific religious dogmas.
Further he has the most boring, monotone voice that is only broken by his uhming.
What am I missing? Why does this dude have a following?
He bested Ben Affleck on why Islam sucks (which isn't much of an accomplishment), he was horribly irrational (due to TDS) when talking with Adams, and he completely dodged Shapiro's larger points while simply attacking aspects of specific religious dogmas.
Further he has the most boring, monotone voice that is only broken by his uhming.
What am I missing? Why does this dude have a following?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News