- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Russia's Lavrov: If Euro Troops enter Ukraine, NATO will fight Russia Directly
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:05 am to Proximo
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:05 am to Proximo
quote:
Turkey mobilizing troops into Ukraine (nato - direct war)
France sending nukes
frick both of these countries, turkey shouldnt be in nato anyways
quote:
Poland bloviating they will start AND FINISH an arms race
im ok with an arms race
but frick turkey, frick france
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:06 am to lsu777
quote:
what am i missing statement wise from poland that they would send in troops?
So in 2024, the Poles suggested that they would not rule out sending troops into Ukraine, echoing French statements. Then a few weeks ago, Donald Tusk has said that Polish troops are not going to Ukraine.
From my view, given their massive reorganization in recent years, they do not have a large amount of troops ready to deploy, which is the major issue for most European countries save for France and Turkey.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:06 am to LARancher1991
quote:That is the general understanding of Article V.
unless one of the NATO countries is directly attacked. Like if Poland, Germany, and France sent troops to Ukraine and started fighting Russia that would not invoke article 5 but if Russia carried out a missile strike inside one of those countries it would. Or at least that's my understanding of it, I might be completely wrong though and just talking out my arse
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:06 am to lsu777
quote:
frick both of these countries, turkey shouldnt be in nato anyways
What? Why?
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:07 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Russia: "It is perfectly acceptable for Russian troops to invade Ukraine, but unacceptable for Polish troops to help defend it."
The possibility of nuclear war should weigh more heavily than what you think is fair. You have a child’s mentality.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:08 am to SmogkDeizKnutz
US just needs to walk away from all...NATO, Macron, Z, etc etc
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:08 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
What? Why?
why? because they do not share the same values as we do. its a sunni muslim country...frick them
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:08 am to Proximo
Yea, I know. What I was saying that if NATO troops are sent to Ukraine and start fighting Russia and that fighting is contained to just Ukraine then it would not invoke Article 5. Now is that likely to happen no Russia will probably carry out long range missile attacks inside Europe.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:09 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
They dislike Russia far more than they dislike Muslims.
For now
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:09 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
US just needs to walk away from all...NATO, Macron, Z, etc etc
yep...tell them if they want war...fine, have at it....we are out and close our bases and start immediately pulling back
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:10 am to lsu777
quote:
why? because they do not share the same values as we do. its a sunni muslim country...frick them
They occupy the most important geopolitical region in the world. That's why they are in NATO. Without that organization, I would worry about their imperialist aims.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:10 am to lsu777
I agree. If turkey sends in troops and France moves nukes, Trump needs to withdraw us from NATO
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:10 am to thebigmuffaletta
That's been the reality for a long time.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:12 am to Bunk Moreland
Our CIA probably helped rig the last polish elections tbh
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 9:13 am
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:12 am to lsu777
Turkey is only in NATO because at the height of the cold war we needed bases in the middle east. Turkey is usually against us whenever they can be and in the past has been more closely aligned with Russia than NATO.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:13 am to LARancher1991
quote:
And the nukes will rain. But hey at least I might get a few days off work, but I doubt it.
Putin not going to use nukes unless people are marching on Moscow. Just more nuclear saber rattling (which they’ve repeatedly done) that’s an obvious bluff.
Besides, all mentions of troops are only for after the fighting has stopped. I.e. if there is a fight it means Russia tried to take more territory while the troops are there.
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 9:16 am
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:13 am to LARancher1991
quote:
And the nukes will rain.
There will be no nukes if the US stays out of it
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:14 am to LARancher1991
quote:
Turkey is usually against us whenever they can be and in the past has been more closely aligned with Russia than NATO
The only reason you can argue that is because the US wouldn't do technology transfers for Patriot missile systems. Otherwise, the Turks have the most antagonistic relationship with Russia, both historically and recently in Syria.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:16 am to crazy4lsu
The only value turkey provides us is good gas station owners and cheap hair transplants. If they want to start nuclear war let them do it on their own
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:16 am to Proximo
quote:He needs to tell them that while they are still saber rattling.
If turkey sends in troops and France moves nukes, Trump needs to withdraw us from NATO
I think the best thing for everyone is for Russia and US to get a minerals deal ASAP. Trump and Putin standing together is the only thing to shut these children up.
Popular
Back to top



2





