- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Russia may soon start providing missiles to Venezuela
Posted on 11/4/25 at 4:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/4/25 at 4:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Well I can't wait for the intellectual consistency and the rhetoric that we have to stop out of fears of WW3, now, like what we saw with Ukraine.
What we're seeing is a direct response to the US getting involved in Ukraine. Otherwise, Russia wouldn't be involving themselves in this.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 4:53 pm to wdhalgren
So get me up to speed on this, I’m apparently behind on this. Given the tone here I take it this thing is a foregone conclusion? Essentially in the works? Irrefutable evidence?
Posted on 11/4/25 at 4:54 pm to bignuss18
quote:
Honestly curious - where in the Monroe Doctorine does it greenlight tampering in some Eastern European shithole that 75% of Americans can’t find on a map?
To be fair 75% of Americans couldn’t accurately label Vermont, New Hampshire and Connecticut on a map.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:13 pm to davyjones
quote:
So get me up to speed on this, I’m apparently behind on this. Given the tone here I take it this thing is a foregone conclusion? Essentially in the works? Irrefutable evidence?
I don't know but there are statements in the OP that suggest it may be a problem. To the extent that it is, we have only ourselves to blame. The danger of our involvement in Ukraine has been patently obvious from the beginning.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:15 pm to wdhalgren
quote:
What we're seeing is a direct response to the US getting involved in Ukraine. Otherwise, Russia wouldn't be involving themselves in this.
That is EXACTLY the talking point Putin wants you to circulate as his NPC/sheep/puppet.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
Well according to,the Monroe Doctrine Russia and Venezuela would be toast
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:23 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
The question is, would they consider doing this had we not been providing arms to Ukraine?
1. Russia invaded a sovereign nation and we were right to send aid.
2. Russia can’t even keep their own army supplied, I doubt they’ll send anything of real substance
3. Even if they do, half of their shite doesn’t work.
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yea.. I am right like always. Have you not seen the amount of drugs they have produced and snuck into our country? Have you not seen the amount of gang members they have let out of their prisons to relocate here? Have you not seen the results of the past 3 election cycles? Not just president but for House and senate elections? All 100% Venezuela - Oh and not to mention, they are basically killing and starving their innocent population - Not a big deal at all though 
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:28 pm to hawgfaninc
They’ll never make it there.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:29 pm to dafif
quote:
I think Russia has a good argument based on our providing Ukraine with weapons

Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:34 pm to TigerRealtor
quote:
1. Russia invaded a sovereign nation and we were right to send aid.

Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:37 pm to FLTech
quote:
Have you not seen the amount of drugs they have produced and snuck into our country?
What's the data on their % of the total?
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:12 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Just another reason that we have no business meddling in Ukraine.
Fify
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:14 pm to Toomer Deplorable
I mean, that’s an interesting meme I suppose. Where did I say we should be bombing anyone? I’m not for the charade in Venezuela or any other offensive actions we’re involved in currently.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:32 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
Fify
I’d prefer we have no military involvement in either place.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:39 pm to hawgfaninc
Who cares.....this would only be an issue if we were at war with Venezuela. We are not. If they shoot at our ships with these missiles, we will be.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:40 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Bad policy nonetheless. Somehow we haven't learned that these countries wouldn't be cozying up to our enemies if we weren't meddling in their internal affairs all the time.
China isn't trying to cozy up to SA countries because we meddle.
Do you really think communist Venezuela would choose to be friends with the US over communist China if only we didn't meddle?
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:56 pm to TigerRealtor
quote:
I’m not for the charade in Venezuela or any other offensive actions we’re involved in currently.
Good for you.
Yet FWIW, the war in the hinterlands of Eastern Europe is itself a charade.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:02 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted by WeeWee 11/4/25 at 3:40 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
If we can meddle in a country next door to Russia, we can't cry they are supporting an ally who we are trying to depose.
Monroe Doctrine says that we can. The largest and second largest air forces in the world says that we can. 11 aircraft carriers says that we can.
If any missiles or weapons seem to our hemisphere should be met with missilea to the receiving country and the sending country. Blow em the hell up!
quote:
If we can meddle in a country next door to Russia, we can't cry they are supporting an ally who we are trying to depose.
Monroe Doctrine says that we can. The largest and second largest air forces in the world says that we can. 11 aircraft carriers says that we can.
If any missiles or weapons seem to our hemisphere should be met with missilea to the receiving country and the sending country. Blow em the hell up!
Popular
Back to top


2








