- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rooftop footage of where shooter was shows difficult line of sight
Posted on 7/24/24 at 7:10 am to Squirrelmeister
Posted on 7/24/24 at 7:10 am to Squirrelmeister
quote:
Where Crooks was on the building according to video evidence, he hadn’t crested the roof to even get a shot on Trump yet.
Let's see it.
Posted on 7/24/24 at 7:40 am to Squirrelmeister
quote:
What if one of those trained snipers had to run to a window 200 yards from the target and fire not from a bolt action rifle with a fancy scope and a spotter but from a police AR-15 with a red dot and hit a guy who moved his head?
If this was a planned assassination by the FBI/CIA/Secret Service, why would they plan it like this?
And by the way, I am skeptical of the audio analysis. As someone who records myself on my phone when practicing new songs, I can tell you slightly changing the distance of the phone from the guitar, or even changing the angle of it, changes the way it sounds.
I don’t trust the government. And I would not be surprised if someone, let’s say the secret service commander who would have been issuing orders that day and who had authority to change the security plan the day of the rally, is involved and let this happen intentionally.
But the idea there were all these multiple shooters is a bridge too far simply because Trump is alive. I can totally buy that crooks was allowed into position to take a shot they were confident he could make. But he missed. You mulit-shooter proponents and the “Crooks didn’t fire, a FBI/CIA/Secret Service sniper did” proponents say these guys did too. If they went to the trouble, and took the risk, to pull off such a plan, wouldn’t they have had a contingency plan if the first shot missed?
I do not trust the government. But I also do not trust each and every random youtube video or tweet I run across either.
Posted on 7/24/24 at 12:41 pm to captdalton
quote:
But the idea there were all these multiple shooters is a bridge too far simply because Trump is alive. I can totally buy that crooks was allowed into position to take a shot they were confident he could make
Sorry man but it’s obvious you haven’t done one bit of research on the subject. Try doing some personal investigation.
Posted on 7/24/24 at 12:46 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:
I never said such a thing. Yes it was an inside job and no Crooks didn’t take the first shot that grazed Trump nor the second or third shot.
Wait, so there were 2 terrible shooters on the roof trying to assassinate Trump?
Posted on 7/24/24 at 12:50 pm to captdalton
quote:
But I also do not trust each and every random youtube video or tweet I run across either.
The fact that so many posters are in disbelief that some youtubers would edit videos to get clicks is hilarious.
For example, my wife showed me a clip of a youtube video from ea college football 25. The band was playing neck during a kickoff return....by auburn.
1) that song isn't in the game
2) auburn doesn't play neck
If something as simple and inconsequential as a youtube about a video game is faked, then why do you have such a hard time considering one of the most famous event in modern history may also be faked by some youtuber desperate for clicks?
This post was edited on 7/24/24 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 7/24/24 at 12:51 pm to BugAC
quote:
Wait, so there were 2 terrible shooters on the roof trying to assassinate Trump?
I think the armchair detectives are saying there was a shooter in a window behind Crooks. At least that’s what they were saying a couple days ago. And the water tower.
Posted on 7/24/24 at 12:52 pm to AmosMosesAndTwins
quote:
I think the armchair detectives are saying there was a shooter in a window behind Crooks. At least that’s what they were saying a couple days ago. And the water tower.
3 bad shooters?
Posted on 7/24/24 at 12:53 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:
Sorry man but it’s obvious you haven’t done one bit of research on the subject. Try doing some personal investigation.
Lol
Posted on 7/24/24 at 12:53 pm to BugAC
quote:
Wait, so there were 2 terrible shooters on the roof trying to assassinate Trump?
Stay w me.
1 main shooter
Possibly crooks but not sure who
But it was not the deceased body on the roof
Posted on 7/24/24 at 12:54 pm to Chad504boy
Make up some stuff.
Gets debunked.
Pivot. Make up different stuff.
Gets debunked.
Pivot. Make up different stuff.
Posted on 7/24/24 at 12:55 pm to BugAC
quote:
3 bad shooters?
I think there was a team of 9 bad shooters. But only 6 of them shot bc the rest held fire after Crooks got shot. At least 4 were on/in the water tower and a couple may still be there. Others escaped via zip line and UFO.
Posted on 7/24/24 at 1:00 pm to AmosMosesAndTwins
quote:
Make up some stuff. Gets debunked. Pivot. Make up different stuff.
It’s not a difficult job being the hating doubter arm chair a-hole making fun of someone like me doing real work on this case. Keep your opinion, that’s fine. All investigations are built on series of pivots and tangents based on info. And still not sure how some pieces fit with others. But I know the location of the shooter. The one who shot first 7-8 rounds
Posted on 7/24/24 at 1:01 pm to AmosMosesAndTwins
quote:
and UFO.
It’s cute how you think typing this makes it seem ludicrous.
Posted on 7/24/24 at 1:01 pm to Chad504boy
Can we get Chad’s handle changed to Loomer504boy?
Posted on 7/24/24 at 1:03 pm to AmosMosesAndTwins
quote:
AmosMosesAndMayorkas
Posted on 7/24/24 at 1:08 pm to BugAC
quote:
3 bad shooters?
No one has to explain why they missed.
One just has to explain the ballistics.
Posted on 7/24/24 at 1:09 pm to the808bass
Being an expert in balls doesn’t make you an expert in ballistics.
Popular
Back to top



0



