- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Ronan Farrow should without question be Time’s “Man of the Year”
Posted on 11/29/17 at 9:47 am
Posted on 11/29/17 at 9:47 am
Trump has already refused it, so to me it’s clear who it should be: Ronan Farrow. This has just gotten so out of control from his piece on Weinstein more than he could have possibly imagined. It’s consumed the industry as a whole, and it is all thanks to Ronan Farrow.
I don’t see how you can bring up another major candidate besides Trump himself.
I don’t see how you can bring up another major candidate besides Trump himself.
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 10:07 am
Posted on 11/29/17 at 9:48 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Ronan Farrow.
Great candidate. Major kudos to that guy.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:00 am to OMLandshark
Endorse
Will also accept him receiving a Pulitzer.
Will also accept him receiving a Pulitzer.
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 10:04 am
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:01 am to OMLandshark
Agree.
Without Weinstein is likely none of these other accusations would have come out either.
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 10:02 am
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:02 am to OMLandshark
It’s kind of hard to argue against Ronan if the pick isn’t Trump
Considering the publication, it will probably be Colin Kaperkneel
Considering the publication, it will probably be Colin Kaperkneel
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 10:03 am
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:04 am to el Gaucho
Rennis just won "Seattle Person of the Year 2017"
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:06 am to OMLandshark
So just checked out Time’s website, and he’s not one of the 33 you can vote for. I feel almost obligated to start a campaign for him. Trump has tried and been fairly successful at destroying the media, but Ronan just delivered a haymaker article that I’d say is one of the 10 most influential articles in American history. He destroyed the media with it, whether that was his intention or not.
Trump is the only one who can be a rational opponent to this. Not Putin, Xi Jinping, or Emperor Fudd. He’s the one who pushed the domino that destroyed the media and entertainment. There needs to be a campaign to be Time’s “Person of the Year”.
Trump is the only one who can be a rational opponent to this. Not Putin, Xi Jinping, or Emperor Fudd. He’s the one who pushed the domino that destroyed the media and entertainment. There needs to be a campaign to be Time’s “Person of the Year”.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:07 am to Decatur
quote:
Will also accept him receiving a Pulitzer.
That I’d be shocked if he didn’t receive. It’s one of the most influential pieces in American History.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:08 am to OMLandshark
quote:and he's the spitting image of woody allen. a chip off the old block, doesn't look anything like frank Sinatra
Ronan Farrow
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:10 am to OMLandshark
As the winner of person of the year in 2006, I think my council should be held high here. Ronan gets my vote.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:11 am to OMLandshark
quote:um, yeah I think you're going way overboard there.
It’s one of the most influential pieces in American History.
and btw I will laugh my arse off at the feminist outrage of a man getting the recognition for their "movement"
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:12 am to OMLandshark
Great choice. Although I think Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey could be included since they broke the initial story about the payments for his misconduct, although Farrow obviously had to fight back against NBC’s suppression of the story which delayed his report.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:13 am to OMLandshark
Good under the radar pick. I thought we had seen the last of old Ronan after he had been gifted a primetime MSNBC slot and flopped badly.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:17 am to DelU249
quote:
um, yeah I think you're going way overboard there.
He’s taking down Hollywood and the entire media. That’s worthy of consideration. Can you cite me ten media pieces in American History more influential? Sure it’s no Ninty-Five Theses, but it’s the most influential article written in this century as far as I’m aware. There may be one that got the American population behind going into Iraq, but that’s the only circumstance I can think of that would top this.
quote:
and btw I will laugh my arse off at the feminist outrage of a man getting the recognition for their "movement"
That has crossed my mind as well, which is just gravy for him getting the award.
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 10:20 am
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:22 am to SirWinston
quote:Unfortunately unless one is hyperpartisan and/or a master showman, it's hard to not flop in the primitime in the 24 hour news networks. And the legitimate stuff is usually in the prime working hours when there aren't as many available viewers.
Good under the radar pick. I thought we had seen the last of old Ronan after he had been gifted a primetime MSNBC slot and flopped badly.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:31 am to OMLandshark
quote:the declaration of independence, the federalist papers, the constitution...you want me to keep going?
Can you cite me ten media pieces in American History more influential?
but it's not influential. it didn't influence anything. he bird dogged it and his story created a fallout...that's not influential. it's impressive. there's nothing to suggest his piece (which by the way most people only know about) has influenced anyone
it's a huge cause and effect, but influence? no way jose
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:44 am to DelU249
quote:
the declaration of independence, the federalist papers, the constitution...you want me to keep going? all the way down to 20th century fiction.
Media, not government. Obviously any Amendment and many laws qualify.
quote:
it's a huge cause and effect, but influence? no way jose
There’s hardly any difference between cause and effect and influence. Did Karl Marx influence many people in his lifetime? Not really. It took 30 years after his death for people to really go along with his ideas. Would anyone doubt that the Communist Manifesto is one of the most influential works ever written? No. Personally I think if Marx knew the hundreds of millions that would die due to writing that pamphlet, he probably would have killed himself.
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 10:51 am
Posted on 11/29/17 at 10:54 am to DelU249
quote:
and he's the spitting image of woody allen. a chip off the old block, doesn't look anything like frank Sinatra
Posted on 11/29/17 at 11:07 am to OMLandshark
quote:i'll play ball. the constitution is government, so i'll give you that. the declaration iffy on government, it was the continental congress; however, it was published for distribution (20 or so copies known to exist)
Media, not government
the federalist papers were published by the media...they were written to promote (influence) the ratification of the constitution. they are still used by federal judges to interpret the constitution. there's just no debating that one.
woodward and Bernstein's reporting on Watergate remarkably influenced our perceptions of government
I would throw in Thomas paine's common sense.
now let's just start with the obvious works of fiction...to kill a mockingbird, uncle tom's cabin, catcher in the rye...sticking with today's theme...the awakening, the scarlet letter (a big one), moby dick...these are very influential and have had lasting impacts on people's attitudes about religion, feminism, slavery, criminal justice, racism
to kill a mockingbird, as jake tapper so obviously pointed out, is relevant to this discussion.
I get you're excited, but the most influential piece ever? not by a long shot. a brief history of time is super influential by providing a layman's understanding of general relativity and quantum mechanics.
Popular
Back to top

15





