- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Robert’s insist that tariffs are a tax on the American people, and a tax needs to come
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:42 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Negative.
You're making the same argument (with the IEEPA) the Biden admin did with their student loan forgiveness scheme (via the HEROES Act),
As I said, if you want to challenge the Administration's interpretation of "emergency," it might have sound basis. Still arguable, but weaker for Trump. That is also the avenue of comparison with the Biden admin's student loan forgiveness scheme.
Certainly there are few comparators aligning the Biden actions you cite whether tariffs are authorized under an issuance of broad authority to regulate transactional interfaces with other countries.
1
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:43 am to Jbird
quote:
Tariffs went up in the first administration under Trump as well, and Biden left those largely in place.
Indeed.
Because Democrats love tariffs.
Like MAGA
Congrats on being ideological brothers with antifa.
This post was edited on 11/6/25 at 7:44 am
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:43 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Negative.
Positive.
Biden used broad language of the HEROES Act regarding student loans (and emergencies, even) in a similar way you're arguing the Trump admin should be able to use IEEPA and tariffs. It's almost a 1:1 comparison.
For comparison, your comment
quote:
and the text says POTUS may investigate, regulate, or prohibit any transactions in foreign exchange.
The applicable HEROES Act language allowed the Secretary of Education to "waive or modify any statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the student financial assistance programs under the Higher Education Act".
"Waive or modify" is a 'grant of unspecified authority", to use your lanugage.
This post was edited on 11/6/25 at 7:46 am
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:44 am to Padme
Trust me, before this is all over the taxpayers will get screwed again. Everything is a tax according to John Roberts. Thanks to John Roberts Obamacare stood, and America was burdened with a disaster.
A disaster that the democrats are now using to keep the government shutdown.
Donald Trump is our last chance to save this country. Already the democrats have thrown their support for the muslim communist. I don't expect any resolution to the government shutdown. These commies smell blood.
President Trump is right about...........everything.
A disaster that the democrats are now using to keep the government shutdown.
Donald Trump is our last chance to save this country. Already the democrats have thrown their support for the muslim communist. I don't expect any resolution to the government shutdown. These commies smell blood.
President Trump is right about...........everything.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Biden used broad language of the HEROES Act regarding student loans (and emergencies, even) in a similar way you're arguing the Trump admin should be able to use IEEPA and tariffs. It's almost a 1:1 comparison.
And he lost too.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:44 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Everyone should do the oposite of what you "conservatives say" You got us into 40tril in debt
quote:
So why would anyone listen to what they have to say
Ok. One has already been exposed in this thread.
Since the democrats are on board for revoking tariffs, thus decreasing revenues, should they surrender their demands for trillions more in spending and sign their own Biden era CR to reopen the government??
Yay or nay?
This post was edited on 11/6/25 at 7:49 am
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:45 am to RogerTheShrubber
Rofgertheretard tell me about 15%
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:45 am to lepdagod
quote:
This statement lacks context… when in the previous 80 years have tariffs impacted the average American consumer as much as the ones Trump have imposed
This is why your argument is dog shite. You’re essentially saying it’s ok if tariffs affect the American consumer a little bit, but just not this much. Who is the judge of how much it affects the consumer to where we can say it’s ok or not ok. frick Off!
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:46 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
And he lost too.
Which was great for us.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not relevant to the IEEPA case
You are an idiot. I was responding to a statement about Obamacare. Jesus man, you are a 1-trick pony.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:46 am to 2 Jugs
quote:
and sent it back to the house.
And the pelosi deemed the bill passed. Now, it is a procedural move, but come on. There was completely different language than the bill the house originally passed.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:47 am to GeorgePaton
quote:
Donald Trump is our last chance to save this country.
President Trump is right about...........everything.
You'll Thank Me Later
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:47 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
This isn't about Trump being picked on. This is about Trump pushing the envelope so hard that it caused a reaction.
Yeah, I don't have the energy to study this particular issue closely and argue the merits, but he is pushing the envelope with other things like the Alien Enemies Act. Most of this board thinks the judiciary is biased, but as boosie said on here, Trump is doing a lot of crazy things that are leading to penalty flags.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:47 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:TDS is an addiction and like all addicts, you are convinced that you don't have a problem everyone else does. Others can see the addiction, but the addict never can.
More cult idiocy.
This post was edited on 11/6/25 at 7:48 am
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Which was great for us.
Agreed. It was the correct decision.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:47 am to FizzyPop
quote:
You are an idiot.
I'm the opposite
quote:
I was responding to a statement about Obamacare.
Yes, a statement explaining to you the same thing I did, that the ACA case is not relevant to the IEEPA case.
quote:
Jesus man, you are a 1-trick pony.
At least I can read
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:48 am to Padme
Congress would be much more credible about tariffs or taxes .... if they first did their job of Legislating
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:48 am to SippyCup
quote:
This is why your argument is dog shite. You’re essentially saying it’s ok if tariffs affect the American consumer a little bit, but just not this much.
One reason is that Trump used stupid reasoning to impart tariffs on most of the world.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:48 am to wackatimesthree
Of course you follow Ashlen
holy shite that chick or whatevers face 
holy shite that chick or whatevers face Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:49 am to RollTide4547
quote:
TDS is an addiction
\
Only exists in your cult.
I've praised trump recently, but you are illiterate and wouldnt know.
Page 10 of 29
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News