- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is the exact argument of the gun grabbers that gets amplified with each mass shooting event.
And? It doesn't mean I'm right, it just means I might have a good reason for doing something that I would normally argue against.
Do you think repeatedly sticking with something that produce bad results is a good idea? Are your "political principles" worth cutting off your nose to spite your face?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:25 am to VoxDawg
Without pharm money, those activist news channels will be in a world of hurt
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:26 am to Flats
quote:
And? It doesn't mean I'm right, it just means I might have a good reason for doing something that I would normally argue against.
Do you think repeatedly sticking with something that produce bad results is a good idea? Are your "political principles" worth cutting off your nose to spite your face?
This is why we have an Amendment process, and why that process is difficult.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:27 am to oklahogjr
quote:
This is just more government restricting a market. I thought we were getting rid of regulations.
Hell, I thought the left wanted to get big corporate money out of politics.
Its going to be fun watching libs try to argue against this.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:27 am to VoxDawg
There are issues more important than this........
But I cant think of one right now. The ad revenue is the lifeblood of the globohomo bolshevist NWO machine.
But I cant think of one right now. The ad revenue is the lifeblood of the globohomo bolshevist NWO machine.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:28 am to VoxDawg
Good. They shouldn't need to advertise.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:29 am to mule74
quote:
Death knell for cable news.
Don't tease me.
(And, obtw, hopefully that would include CONTROLLED OPPOSITION Fake Fox, the "news" network that won't even allow people to criticize George Soros).
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:29 am to Strannix
quote:
But I cant think of one right now. The ad revenue is the lifeblood of the globohomo bolshevist NWO machine.
Yup. The dem funding is being crushed
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:30 am to tide06
Well, that won’t be good for the SEC….
Good for America overall though.
Good for America overall though.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:30 am to VoxDawg
Do not like. Seeing fatties dancing around my TV makes me feel much better about myself.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:31 am to VoxDawg
Big Pharma spends about 18 Billion per year on advertising. Just think if all that money could go into R&D.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:31 am to VoxDawg
Bs. Companies have as much right to free speech as private citizens do.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:31 am to TechBullDawg
the libs will trot out all types of nauseating comparisons and whataboutisms.
Ignore them. Having prescription drugs marketed directly to the public has zero benefit except as a mechanism for doctor shopping and media influence. Which is why almost zero countries allow this.
Ignore them. Having prescription drugs marketed directly to the public has zero benefit except as a mechanism for doctor shopping and media influence. Which is why almost zero countries allow this.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is why we have an Amendment process, and why that process is difficult.
1. Most people are discussing whether or not this is a good idea, not whether or not it will be successful.
2. We didn't amend anything to censor other commercial interests.
Are you not going to answer my questions? Again?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:34 am to Flats
how tf is this censorship? LOL
Pharma will continue to aggressively market to physicians. What will their argument be to market direct to consumers who cant buy their products otc and shouldnt be self-medicating? Trust science, trust doctors, remember?
Pharma will continue to aggressively market to physicians. What will their argument be to market direct to consumers who cant buy their products otc and shouldnt be self-medicating? Trust science, trust doctors, remember?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:35 am to prplhze2000
tell that to tobacco companies
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:36 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
how tf is this censorship? LOL
What do you call attacking the 1st Amendment and regulating speech?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:37 am to VoxDawg
Great… no more list of side effects of death and paralysis
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:39 am to VoxDawg
No way this happens. Some Networks will go out of business as they exist on pharma advertising. Will be interesting to watch this play out.
Popular
Back to top


1











