- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Respect for Marriage Act passes House (258 to 169) - now heads to Biden's desk
Posted on 12/8/22 at 11:54 am to Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 12/8/22 at 11:54 am to Mickey Goldmill
This bill legalizes perversion and immorality. I call this bill the “Disrespect for Marriage Act.”
This post was edited on 12/8/22 at 11:55 am
2
Posted on 12/8/22 at 11:54 am to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
Is this constitutional?
It is just a codification of Obergefell relative to recognition of marriages performed legally in other states. So, yes.
This post was edited on 12/8/22 at 11:55 am
Posted on 12/8/22 at 11:55 am to Mickey Goldmill
They will use this law to go after all religious faiths that don't recognize gay marriage.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 11:55 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
So, gloves coming off to attack churches? Force churches to accept same sex marriages or lose your exemption.
No but they can target a bake shop now
Posted on 12/8/22 at 11:55 am to tiger1014
quote:
What fantasy land are you living in? Just because you say it doesn’t make it reality. There are gay people married all over the United States. So just deal with it I guess?
Then what was the purpose of this law?
Posted on 12/8/22 at 11:56 am to the808bass
quote:
When this law is used to sue churches,
Your terminology is unfortunately correct, WHEN not IF....
Posted on 12/8/22 at 11:56 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Incorrect. Please stop lying to people.
LOL
Within 10 years you'll be fully on board with the idea that people who disagree with homosexuality have no place in our society and should be pushed to its margins, regardless of their tolerance/civility toward it.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 11:56 am to tiger1014
quote:
That didn’t take long
Would you like to try to give us a definition of marriage?
Posted on 12/8/22 at 11:57 am to dchog
quote:
hey will use this law to go after all religious faiths that don't recognize gay marriage.
Can someone point me to the language in the bill that allows this, or that is causing this concern?
This post was edited on 12/8/22 at 12:03 pm
Posted on 12/8/22 at 11:58 am to Indefatigable
Do you want to show me in the law what allowed SCOTUS to revoke John Brown University’s tax exempt status?
Posted on 12/8/22 at 12:01 pm to zaniesmo12
This is what all this crap boils down to. You can literally trace all the negative of what's going on in our nation to the attack on Christianity. And no not the watered down crap. The teachings and life/resurrection of Jesus Christ. Its plain as day but people don't see it, refuse to see it, or out right are for it.
Downvote away.
Downvote away.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 12:03 pm to Mickey Goldmill
A marriage is between a man and a woman.
America adopting a perverted broadening of that definition, whether legally or culturally, only delegitimizes America itself. Just like so many in this pathetic remnant of a country are trying to redefine what constitutes a 'man' and 'woman.' Same cretinous crowd who think they can redefine 'marriage.'
America will be long dead, and 'marriage' will still be only a man and a woman.
America adopting a perverted broadening of that definition, whether legally or culturally, only delegitimizes America itself. Just like so many in this pathetic remnant of a country are trying to redefine what constitutes a 'man' and 'woman.' Same cretinous crowd who think they can redefine 'marriage.'
America will be long dead, and 'marriage' will still be only a man and a woman.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 12:03 pm to the808bass
quote:
Do you want to show me in the law what allowed SCOTUS to revoke John Brown University’s tax exempt status?
No.
Asking what language in the bill is causing this concern is not an unreasonable question or request.
This post was edited on 12/8/22 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 12/8/22 at 12:03 pm to Indefatigable
Good choice. It’s nowhere in the law.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 12:03 pm to Jrv2damac
quote:
So what exactly are the gays gonna get to do that they weren’t already able to do with this grandstanding horseshite
Oh you know... like.. things and stuff. And then all those other things and stuff too. Look it was really important this got passed
Posted on 12/8/22 at 12:04 pm to GumboPot
quote:
The definition of marriage by the Church is a universal and eternal definition.
It use to be one man many women. Don't pretend it hasn't changed within your religion.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 12:05 pm to the808bass
quote:
Good choice. It’s nowhere in the law.
Ok. Then I think it is an odd concern.
If that isn't a provision in the legislation, it seems to me that if the government could revoke exemptions extra-statutorily for not supporting gay marriage then there is nothing stopping the government from doing it now.
Why is that a point made in opposition to the legislation if the legislation doesn't provide for it?
Posted on 12/8/22 at 12:07 pm to tiger1014
quote:
That didn’t take long
Dude marriage has a religious meaning for thousands of years. If you and your boyfriend want to commit to each other at a higher level, create a new thing instead of taking over something to support your recent ideals.
Geez you gays take things over things and get all pissy when people don't want your perversions mixed in. Take over the rainbow and now thinking you can take over the meaning of marriage.
Your sham of a wedding will never be equal no matter how many times you tell yourself it. Husband AND wife is the only natural combo. Take it up with Mother Nature if you have an issue with it.
Facts are facts.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 12:08 pm to dchog
quote:
They will use this law to go after all religious faiths that don't recognize gay marriage.
How so, though? What gives this law more teeth than Obergefell already does?
Another poster said that there is nothing in this law regarding exemption status.
So what is causing the concern? Where is it coming from?
Posted on 12/8/22 at 12:09 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
legislation on Thursday to protect same-sex and interracial marriage
HUH??
"Interracial marriage" has NEVER needed "protection". This is out-and-out bullsh*t propaganda.
The Mutants are using a make-believe threat to "inter-racial ANY thing to give cover for officially sanctioning (and clubbing over the head with the courts) those who refuse to accept Impossible / Un-Natural / Bestial / Multi-Polygamous "Marriage".
quote:
Loud applause broke out in the chamber when the vote was gaveled to a close....
...then several Congress-Critters carried on, squealing like livestock, "gaveling" themselves silly underneath the chambers benching.
Page 3 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News