- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Respect for Marriage Act passed by Senate. Goes to House for final vote.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:37 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:37 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
One of the big fears of James Madison when he wrote the Bill of Rights would be that the masses would believe that if it is not listed specifically in the Constitution that they would believe that right does not exist.
... and then, there was Amendment Ten.
I guess you forgot the bolded part of the amendment.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
0
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:40 pm to Flats
quote:
You keep using this term like it means something.
Because it does.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:42 pm to SoonerK
quote:No?
Would it be unconstitutional for a state to pass a law that could arrest you for having sex with another consenting adult?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:43 pm to SoonerK
Should first cousins be allowed to marry?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:43 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Because you believe does not make it so.
Just like everything you believe doesn't make it so.
Should cousins marry? Because many states don't allow first cousins to marry.
Yes.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:45 pm to HubbaBubba
They are fools.
Not that long ago, the Defense of Marriage Act was passed.
What happened to that one?
Not that long ago, the Defense of Marriage Act was passed.
What happened to that one?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:45 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Would it be unconstitutional for a state to pass a law that could arrest you for having sex with another consenting adult?
No?
FFS. OK, how about that occurs in your own bedroom?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:45 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Bad analogy.
Should first cousins be allowed to marry?
The question is whether first cousins who legally married in Alabama (where they may do so) must be recognized as married in Arizona (where they may not.
Yes.
This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:46 pm to SoonerK
quote:
Because it does.
What does it mean? You were just shown states that recognize different ages for being able to make this particular decision. Is it 18? Oops, not if you want to buy beer. How old does a teen have to be to get an abortion?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:47 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
No?
Clearly they violated The Book of Secular that must exist.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:48 pm to SoonerK
quote:
None of those are outlawing marriage itself.
You’re so close….
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:49 pm to AggieHank86
quote:. Np one cares what a social outcast thinks.
Bad analogy
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:49 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Should first cousins be allowed to marry?
Bad analogy.
The SSM bill, the one not yet finalized, addresses legality of SSM.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:51 pm to PollyDawg
quote:
Not that long ago, the Defense of Marriage Act was passed.
What happened to that one?
This repeals DOMA
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:51 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
quote:
I read you post, and must ask one question … are you high?
I've edited my post for the sake of errors and context. Despite the errors and your dismissive arrogance, you should still understand my post (unless you're truly that terrified to respond.)
By the way, Hank -- Why is your very first posture in avoiding defending your posts a response of either, "You are angry." OR "Are you high"?
Citing "anger" or "intoxication" or "gibberish" of your opponents --besides your your usual pretentious legal bullet points -- won't help your credibility OR defense of this euphemistically named bullsh*t [Qweer] 'Marriage Act' bill, Sweetie.
quote:
Most of your posts are incomprehensible gibberish.
Maybe...
Sometimes we see what we want to see and rationalize truth as "gibberish."
But then again most of *your* posts are in defense of sodomists and their kinks, aren't they? Which also means, in defense of adult men who dress up as women *as* they read stories to children; As well as on crusading on behalf of the Mentally Ill to practice and spread their "gender dysphoria" afflictions and assault on the most innocent.
You're welcome to give your defense of this particular 'Marriage Act' a shot, Sport. Whatchoo got? (other than requires States to officially humor / respect the legality of multi/inter-homo, inter-species, "Marriage"?)
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:52 pm to Liberator
quote:
Sometimes we see what we want to see and rationalize truth as "gibberish."
If he can't find a legal cite, it's gibberish to him.
Everyone else understands.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:52 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:Which has no bearing upon cousin marriage.
The SSM bill, the one not yet finalized, addresses legality of SSM.
Are you asking about a SSM between Alabama first cousins who move to a state which bans cousin marriage?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:55 pm to Liberator
quote:Full Faith and Credit clause. Article IV, Section 1.
You're welcome to give your defense of this particular 'Marriage Act' a shot, Sport. Whatchoo got?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:56 pm to SoonerK
quote:
Supreme Court Justices along with the Current Chief Justice would disagree with you.
Roberts dissented in the Obergefell decision. Indeed, the likely reason for the bill is to create a statutory (not constitutional) right because the fear is that the majority of the current justices may not find that right in the Constitution
They might find that the recognition of a marriage is a full faith and credit issue, but that is what the statute is codifying
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:58 pm to dukkbill
In other words, they are not making the Roe/Dobbs mistake again.
Page 13 of 15
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News