Started By
Message

re: Reports of a potential MASS SHOOTlNG at Fort Stewart in Georgia

Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:54 am to
Posted by FGCU Gator
DC
Member since Oct 2008
2869 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:54 am to
quote:

commissioned officers carrying a M17 in a holster, but anyone more junior is asking for issues


You haven’t met some of these nugget Ensigns and Second Lieutenants. They’re no better than an enlisted 22 year old.

Signed,

A commissioned officer
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
7888 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:55 am to
Could you list those places?
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
28669 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:55 am to
quote:

mwade91383


You're wrong and stupid in every post here. Stop arguing...
Posted by Hayekian serf
GA
Member since Dec 2020
4215 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Damn, if only the post was a gun free zone…



It is
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57897 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Which places have more armed security than military bases?

Like everybody is saying bases are essentially locked down (and can’t bring themselves to admit why) but they STILL have more armed security present than virtually anywhere the average person goes on a daily/weekly basis.


That's at entry and exit points. Once you are in, you are in. You should know this, but you're trying to make a political point that ultimately fails.

LINK

quote:

While post commanders by and large determine their own regulations for acceptable behavior on the base they oversee, many locations do not allow any personal firearms to be brought on the installation or stored in base housing or barracks. Troops living in barracks or other similar quarters who own personal weapons typically must register and store them in a base firearms storage facility. You should check with your local base to learn rules specific to that installation.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63498 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Which places have more armed security than military bases?

Like everybody is saying bases are essentially locked down (and can’t bring themselves to admit why) but they STILL have more armed security present than virtually anywhere the average person goes on a daily/weekly basis.
Too stupid to even argue with.
Posted by Breaux
Member since Nov 2005
4633 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:59 am to
quote:

STILL have more armed security present than virtually anywhere the average person goes on a daily/weekly basis


This isn't true at all. Gates are manned with armed MPs, but not every vehicle is searched. Everything else is the same as you would see from local city police once on base. You don't have guards at the stores and buildings like you think.

You can continue to try to make your point, but your ignorance is obvious.
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
7888 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:59 am to
Why do these strict policies exist on bases? It’s not politics.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57897 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Why do these strict policies exist on bases? It’s not politics.


It's not? So renaming of bases is undoubtedly politics, but open carry on this federal property is not?

Rather than cowardly trying to infer something, why don't you state it plainly, so i can make you look silly.
This post was edited on 8/6/25 at 12:04 pm
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16880 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

quote:
There are virtually no places in the country that have more “good guys with a gun” than US military bases.


quote:

Short of active live fire exercises or a range day, this is entirely wrong

quote:

Why are those policies in place?

Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
7888 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 12:04 pm to
Are you arguing firearm policy and naming of bases are the same thing?

Talk about looking silly.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30551 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

There are virtually no places in the country that have more “good guys with a gun” than US military bases.



You are fricking retarded... no one is allowed to carry on post and concealed carry is prohibited....
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57897 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Are you arguing firearm policy and naming of bases are the same thing?


Only if you are stupid enough to interpret it that way.

Again, spit out exactly what you are implying rather than chicken shitting around this thread. There is a reason you won't, and we all know why.
This post was edited on 8/6/25 at 12:06 pm
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
7888 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 12:06 pm to
It was your comparison clown.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
26296 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 12:06 pm to
This thread has gone as predicted.

The condition of any victims gets set aside while FlexBros argue over who knows more about what happens on an Army post they have never been to.
This post was edited on 8/6/25 at 12:07 pm
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57897 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

You are fricking retarded... no one is allowed to carry on post and concealed carry is prohibited....


Shhh..... let him figure it out.
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
12755 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

There are virtually no places in the country that have more “good guys with a gun” than US military bases.

Soldiers have zero access to firearms unless they are going to a range. And then they have no ammo until it is distributed at the range before qualifying.
Stay stupid TD.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57897 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 12:12 pm to
quote:


It was your comparison clown.


That you aren't smart enough to understand.

As stated before, that you are gleefully ignoring, you cannot carry in most if not all military bases. Security is at checkpoints. You're sick own of "but where is the good guys with guns" is actually a valid point, considering sidearms are not allowed. The reason for that, is likely a federal mandate, which is POLITICAL. And who was POTUS the last 4 years, do you think at any point the waste of oxygen that you voted for in Biden would have allowed open carry under his tenure? Of course you don't. I'm not saying that Biden implemented the firearm ban, i honestly don't know who did, nor do you. But, given the abundance of facts about firearms, the stats regarding open carry, there really isn't a logical reason why open carry is not allowed on some parts of these campuses. And if logic is what is being ignored on federal property, what doesn't get ignored on federal property??? POLITICS, dumbass.

Now, again why don't you go ahead and state your inference rather than being yellow?
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157973 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 12:12 pm to
Tends to happen when leftists start spouting bullshite, get corrected, press on, continue arguing and attempt stupid gotchas.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30551 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

It is


No shite...
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram