
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Report: Thousands of new docs point to a diabolical CIA color revolution after midterms…
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:08 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:08 am to SlowFlowPro
Fine. Biden is still a far outlier
2008 BO 69M
2012 BO 66M
2016 HC 66M
2020 JB 81M
2024 KH 75M
2008 BO 69M
2012 BO 66M
2016 HC 66M
2020 JB 81M
2024 KH 75M
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:10 am to Napoleon
quote:
Shhh sit back and belive his shitty AI.
Kamala got 75m to Trumps 77.3m.
Biden is still a far outlier
2008 BO 69M
2012 BO 66M
2016 HC 66M
2020 JB 81M
2024 KH 75M
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:15 am to BoarEd
quote:
Governor JB Pritzker @GovPritzker is explicitly named in the videos as one of only two governors willing to green-light the “illegitimacy memo”
DataRepublican herself proves this is a LARP and nothing burger
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:16 am to RemyLeBeau
quote:
Biden is still a far outlier
2008 BO 69M
2012 BO 66M
2016 HC 66M
2020 JB 81M
2024 KH 75M
Kamala lost support primarily in super-DEM areas (aka, areas that wouldn't have mass cheating in 2020)

Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:23 am to RemyLeBeau
Wife and I were talking about this and the most disappointing part of all of it is "where is the diabolical genius?"
In the books and movies, the plan is complex and difficult to unravel but in real life like in 2020, the plan was simple, right-in-your-face, and you would have had to have an IQ of a broken shoelace to not see the massive election fraud (or been in on it), aka boosie / SFP.
Same thing here - the plan is obvious, they openly talk about it, and it is staring everyone in the face but people with shite for brains still go "duuuuurrrrr". At least make it a challenge.
In the books and movies, the plan is complex and difficult to unravel but in real life like in 2020, the plan was simple, right-in-your-face, and you would have had to have an IQ of a broken shoelace to not see the massive election fraud (or been in on it), aka boosie / SFP.
Same thing here - the plan is obvious, they openly talk about it, and it is staring everyone in the face but people with shite for brains still go "duuuuurrrrr". At least make it a challenge.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:24 am to Melkor
quote:
and you would have had to have an IQ of a broken shoelace to not see the massive election fraud (or been in on it), aka boosie / SFP.
Show me the direct, credible evidence and I'll analyze it.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:27 am to Melkor
quote:
In the books and movies, the plan is complex and difficult to unravel but in real life like in 2020, the plan was simple, right-in-your-face, and you would have had to have an IQ of a broken shoelace to not see the massive election fraud (or been in on it), aka boosie / SFP.
Same thing here - the plan is obvious, they openly talk about it, and it is staring everyone in the face but people with shite for brains still go "duuuuurrrrr". At least make it a challenge.
Because the only places they needed to manipulate votes are deep blue cities in democrat friendly States. They weren't jacking with mail in ballots, or ballot counting in Tylertown, Mississippi or Pensacola, Florida
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:36 am to RemyLeBeau
quote:
Because the only places they needed to manipulate votes are deep blue cities in democrat friendly States. They weren't jacking with mail in ballots, or ballot counting in Tylertown, Mississippi or Pensacola, Florida
This is why the scheme in OP and the purported 2020 fraud don't work as comparisons.
The scheme in OP requires a LOT more across the entire country
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:52 am to BoarEd
It appears FOX had Laura Ingraham talking about it last night. I wonder how many other MSM liars will get on it.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 9:58 am to BoarEd
Would you please post this? "Who decides when your government is legitimate?"
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
I spent most of yesterday backing everything (now 312 gigabytes) up in various sources and getting the materials out to others. I also produced an AI video (below) to explain the whole thing to others are not on ?? - feel free to distribute.
Here's the primer:
USAID, the foreign aid agency, had a democracy office. Inside the agency, it was called DRG.
Officially, DRG administered "democracy assistance." They'd go inside countries they thought were sliding into authoritarianism and help the opposition there. That assistance included election monitoring, judicary support, independent media, and civil society building.
You may have heard the term "color revolution." The model comes from Serbia in 2000, where trained student activists brought down Milosevic with the help of Western governments, after sustained protests. With the help of USAID's democracy office, this model was implemented in many other countries to topple governments: Georgia's "Rose Revolution" in 2003, Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" in 2004, and many more.
Then last year, DOGE shut down USAID. But the USAID democracy office didn't stop. They formed a group called the Democracy Renewal Group, the same initials as their office (USAID Democracy, Human Rights, Governance). Their goal: apply their own playbook to the United States itself.
This goal became a plan, called Renew American Democracy (RAD). It invoked the "4 B's" framework. Block - use lawfare and protests to make life harder for the Trump administration. Bridge & Belong - control dialogue and win people over. The final and most important B is Build. Build means redesigning the American government itself, and the crisis is the opening.
In their own words:
"We can take that breakdown moment and leverage it for a big structural reform, you know, refounding moment." - Danielle Reiff, DRG lead.
Calls show DRG working alongside DSA on ideas of creating a different government, one that does away with the Constitution itself.
DRG does not run the Block operations. They hand it to UDA, the United Democracy Alliance. One organizer calls it a "huge galaxy": lawsuits, street protests, non-cooperation. They list No Kings, Indivisible, MoveOn, 50501, and many other mega-activist NGOs among their members.
Another organizer calls UDA Erica Chenoweth's project. Chenoweth is the Harvard professor behind the three-and-half-percent rule of regime change: get that share of a country's populace onto the streets, and historically, the movement wins.
The UDA is very "hush-hush." They have no website, no roster, no filings.
Then come the red lines: things the Trump administration could do, such as calling the Insurrection Act on protesters, that would mean that the federal government, in their words, "crosses the threshold into illegitimacy." Nobody voted on those lines. There was no public debate. These red lines were developed within secretive working groups, and in a paper addressed to governors and staff.
In the words of Reiff/DRG:
"So that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a Constitutional crisis, like everyone's already pre-organized. And so Mike Smith actually said, he goes, oh, you guys have the day after tomorrow plan."
Cross a line, and the paper's options include states refusing to lend their resources to federal officials, and governors convening what it calls a "Third Continential Congress."
Running the UDA's Insurrection Act working group: Rear Admiral Mike Smith (RET) of National Security Leaders of America (NSL4A). NSL4A is also credited with operationalizing UDA, the blocking operations. NSL4A consists of about 1,600 ex-officers, spies, diplomats. They're turning red lines into indicators and running a situation room to monitor them throughout the midterms and beyond.
The NSL4A's lawyers told them to stop recording meetings in case of subpoenas. But the rest of the network continued to record. DRG works in conjunction with Renew to Thrive (R2T), which ended up accidentally publishing 400+ calls and thousands of documents. These calls and documents were never meant for our eyes, but it's them, on tape.
Thousands of NGOs and billions of dollars are involved in this endeavor. Most of them believe they're saving democracy. The problem is that people who spent their careers deciding when other countries' governments had lost their legitimacy wrote that test for ours, in private, and planned for what comes after.
Who decides when your government is legitimate?
Posted on 10/22/26 at 10:43 am to Ailsa
quote:
You may have heard the term "color revolution." The model comes from Serbia in 2000, where trained student activists brought down Milosevic with the help of Western governments, after sustained protests.
Milosevic was brought down by a lot more than "sustained protests" or USAID
quote:
was implemented in many other countries to topple governments: Georgia's "Rose Revolution" in 2003, Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" in 2004, and many more.
Serbia, Georgia, and Ukraine? I sense a theme developing.
quote:
Then come the red lines: things the Trump administration could do, such as calling the Insurrection Act on protesters, that would mean that the federal government, in their words, "crosses the threshold into illegitimacy." Nobody voted on those lines. There was no public debate. These red lines were developed within secretive working groups, and in a paper addressed to governors and staff.
Nobody outside of these little echo chambers would take those lines seriously, either, including Trump.
quote:
Cross a line, and the paper's options include states refusing to lend their resources to federal officials, and governors convening what it calls a "Third Continential Congress."
LARPing.
DataRebpuclican has already admitted that there are MAYBE 2 govnernors considering this. Two.
quote:
Who decides when your government is legitimate?
DataRepublican is trying to out-LARP the LARPers
Posted on 10/22/26 at 10:46 am to SlowFlowPro
Tbe desperation these people have over this is hilarious.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 10:49 am to BoarEd
quote:
She says there are two of them.
Which is five too many.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 10:50 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
So now we’ve moved on the DataRepublican getting her Dept. of War psyop taking points trying to convince us the left is going to steal it so that’s why Daddy will have to invoke martial law.
If these recordings and papers and meetings are all legit, then I don't get why the FBI hasn't already made arrest. If DataRepublican has these documents then there is no way the DoW doesn't have them. 18 U.S. Code § 2384 is right there for all 1600 people or whatever to be arrested and prevented from carrying out their plot.
While everything in her drops seems very damning, the fact that a fed is dropping them on social media and no one is being put in cuffs makes me very skeptical of it.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 10:51 am to lionward2014
Exactly. Where are Patel and Blanche to go after the coup plotters?
Posted on 10/22/26 at 10:55 am to lionward2014
quote:
If these recordings and papers and meetings are all legit, then I don't get why the FBI hasn't already made arrest. If DataRepublican has these documents then there is no way the DoW doesn't have them. 18 U.S. Code § 2384 is right there for all 1600 people or whatever to be arrested and prevented from carrying out their plot.
While everything in her drops seems very damning, the fact that a fed is dropping them on social media and no one is being put in cuffs makes me very skeptical of it.
Indictments being unsealed across the nation today, coincidentally.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 11:02 am to BoarEd
quote:
Tbe desperation these people have over this is hilarious.
You mean the people promoting nonsense emotional rhetoric that has no threat to reality, right?
This purported plan makes no sense. I believe the plan is genuine, but those who think it would work are retarded, along with the people who think it's an actual threat to do anything.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 11:02 am to BoarEd
quote:
Indictments being unsealed across the nation today, coincidentally.
About this specific plot, or are you doing the kernel of truth fallacy again?
Posted on 10/22/26 at 11:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I believe the plan is genuine,
Of course it's genuine. And that's what the threads are about. You spamming the threads like a child will not change that. And again, these people are not just a bunch of children sitting around hatching nonsensical plans. They are people who are highly educated and they are backed by serious people with a lot of money.
Your shillery is obvious. You're calling DR a larper while trying to insist that the people actually devising these plans you admit are real are, in fact, larping, rather than being serious.
There are billionaires, national security officers, governors of states, retired military generals, et al involved in these "unserious plans" you are spamming the threads over. Grow up.

Popular
Back to top



1











