Started By
Message

re: Report: Thousands of new docs point to a diabolical CIA color revolution after midterms…

Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:08 am to
Posted by RemyLeBeau
Member since Mar 2015
2727 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:08 am to
Fine. Biden is still a far outlier

2008 BO 69M
2012 BO 66M
2016 HC 66M
2020 JB 81M
2024 KH 75M
Posted by RemyLeBeau
Member since Mar 2015
2727 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Shhh sit back and belive his shitty AI.

Kamala got 75m to Trumps 77.3m.




Biden is still a far outlier

2008 BO 69M
2012 BO 66M
2016 HC 66M
2020 JB 81M
2024 KH 75M
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486427 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:15 am to
quote:

Governor JB Pritzker @GovPritzker is explicitly named in the videos as one of only two governors willing to green-light the “illegitimacy memo”

DataRepublican herself proves this is a LARP and nothing burger
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486427 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Biden is still a far outlier

2008 BO 69M
2012 BO 66M
2016 HC 66M
2020 JB 81M
2024 KH 75M


Kamala lost support primarily in super-DEM areas (aka, areas that wouldn't have mass cheating in 2020)

Posted by Melkor
Member since Sep 2022
227 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:23 am to
Wife and I were talking about this and the most disappointing part of all of it is "where is the diabolical genius?"

In the books and movies, the plan is complex and difficult to unravel but in real life like in 2020, the plan was simple, right-in-your-face, and you would have had to have an IQ of a broken shoelace to not see the massive election fraud (or been in on it), aka boosie / SFP.

Same thing here - the plan is obvious, they openly talk about it, and it is staring everyone in the face but people with shite for brains still go "duuuuurrrrr". At least make it a challenge.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486427 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:24 am to
quote:

and you would have had to have an IQ of a broken shoelace to not see the massive election fraud (or been in on it), aka boosie / SFP.

Show me the direct, credible evidence and I'll analyze it.
Posted by RemyLeBeau
Member since Mar 2015
2727 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:27 am to
quote:

In the books and movies, the plan is complex and difficult to unravel but in real life like in 2020, the plan was simple, right-in-your-face, and you would have had to have an IQ of a broken shoelace to not see the massive election fraud (or been in on it), aka boosie / SFP.

Same thing here - the plan is obvious, they openly talk about it, and it is staring everyone in the face but people with shite for brains still go "duuuuurrrrr". At least make it a challenge.


Because the only places they needed to manipulate votes are deep blue cities in democrat friendly States. They weren't jacking with mail in ballots, or ballot counting in Tylertown, Mississippi or Pensacola, Florida
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486427 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Because the only places they needed to manipulate votes are deep blue cities in democrat friendly States. They weren't jacking with mail in ballots, or ballot counting in Tylertown, Mississippi or Pensacola, Florida


This is why the scheme in OP and the purported 2020 fraud don't work as comparisons.

The scheme in OP requires a LOT more across the entire country
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
27937 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 8:52 am to
It appears FOX had Laura Ingraham talking about it last night. I wonder how many other MSM liars will get on it.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
13085 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 9:58 am to
Would you please post this? "Who decides when your government is legitimate?"
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


quote:

I spent most of yesterday backing everything (now 312 gigabytes) up in various sources and getting the materials out to others. I also produced an AI video (below) to explain the whole thing to others are not on ?? - feel free to distribute.

Here's the primer:

USAID, the foreign aid agency, had a democracy office. Inside the agency, it was called DRG.

Officially, DRG administered "democracy assistance." They'd go inside countries they thought were sliding into authoritarianism and help the opposition there. That assistance included election monitoring, judicary support, independent media, and civil society building.

You may have heard the term "color revolution." The model comes from Serbia in 2000, where trained student activists brought down Milosevic with the help of Western governments, after sustained protests. With the help of USAID's democracy office, this model was implemented in many other countries to topple governments: Georgia's "Rose Revolution" in 2003, Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" in 2004, and many more.

Then last year, DOGE shut down USAID. But the USAID democracy office didn't stop. They formed a group called the Democracy Renewal Group, the same initials as their office (USAID Democracy, Human Rights, Governance). Their goal: apply their own playbook to the United States itself.

This goal became a plan, called Renew American Democracy (RAD). It invoked the "4 B's" framework. Block - use lawfare and protests to make life harder for the Trump administration. Bridge & Belong - control dialogue and win people over. The final and most important B is Build. Build means redesigning the American government itself, and the crisis is the opening.

In their own words:
"We can take that breakdown moment and leverage it for a big structural reform, you know, refounding moment." - Danielle Reiff, DRG lead.

Calls show DRG working alongside DSA on ideas of creating a different government, one that does away with the Constitution itself.

DRG does not run the Block operations. They hand it to UDA, the United Democracy Alliance. One organizer calls it a "huge galaxy": lawsuits, street protests, non-cooperation. They list No Kings, Indivisible, MoveOn, 50501, and many other mega-activist NGOs among their members.

Another organizer calls UDA Erica Chenoweth's project. Chenoweth is the Harvard professor behind the three-and-half-percent rule of regime change: get that share of a country's populace onto the streets, and historically, the movement wins.

The UDA is very "hush-hush." They have no website, no roster, no filings.

Then come the red lines: things the Trump administration could do, such as calling the Insurrection Act on protesters, that would mean that the federal government, in their words, "crosses the threshold into illegitimacy." Nobody voted on those lines. There was no public debate. These red lines were developed within secretive working groups, and in a paper addressed to governors and staff.

In the words of Reiff/DRG:
"So that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a Constitutional crisis, like everyone's already pre-organized. And so Mike Smith actually said, he goes, oh, you guys have the day after tomorrow plan."

Cross a line, and the paper's options include states refusing to lend their resources to federal officials, and governors convening what it calls a "Third Continential Congress."

Running the UDA's Insurrection Act working group: Rear Admiral Mike Smith (RET) of National Security Leaders of America (NSL4A). NSL4A is also credited with operationalizing UDA, the blocking operations. NSL4A consists of about 1,600 ex-officers, spies, diplomats. They're turning red lines into indicators and running a situation room to monitor them throughout the midterms and beyond.

The NSL4A's lawyers told them to stop recording meetings in case of subpoenas. But the rest of the network continued to record. DRG works in conjunction with Renew to Thrive (R2T), which ended up accidentally publishing 400+ calls and thousands of documents. These calls and documents were never meant for our eyes, but it's them, on tape.

Thousands of NGOs and billions of dollars are involved in this endeavor. Most of them believe they're saving democracy. The problem is that people who spent their careers deciding when other countries' governments had lost their legitimacy wrote that test for ours, in private, and planned for what comes after.

Who decides when your government is legitimate?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486427 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 10:43 am to
quote:

You may have heard the term "color revolution." The model comes from Serbia in 2000, where trained student activists brought down Milosevic with the help of Western governments, after sustained protests.


Milosevic was brought down by a lot more than "sustained protests" or USAID

quote:

was implemented in many other countries to topple governments: Georgia's "Rose Revolution" in 2003, Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" in 2004, and many more.


Serbia, Georgia, and Ukraine? I sense a theme developing.

quote:

Then come the red lines: things the Trump administration could do, such as calling the Insurrection Act on protesters, that would mean that the federal government, in their words, "crosses the threshold into illegitimacy." Nobody voted on those lines. There was no public debate. These red lines were developed within secretive working groups, and in a paper addressed to governors and staff.


Nobody outside of these little echo chambers would take those lines seriously, either, including Trump.

quote:

Cross a line, and the paper's options include states refusing to lend their resources to federal officials, and governors convening what it calls a "Third Continential Congress."

LARPing.

DataRebpuclican has already admitted that there are MAYBE 2 govnernors considering this. Two.

quote:

Who decides when your government is legitimate?

DataRepublican is trying to out-LARP the LARPers
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
45918 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 10:46 am to
Tbe desperation these people have over this is hilarious.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
79891 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 10:49 am to
quote:

She says there are two of them.

Which is five too many.
Posted by lionward2014
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
14798 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 10:50 am to
quote:

So now we’ve moved on the DataRepublican getting her Dept. of War psyop taking points trying to convince us the left is going to steal it so that’s why Daddy will have to invoke martial law.



If these recordings and papers and meetings are all legit, then I don't get why the FBI hasn't already made arrest. If DataRepublican has these documents then there is no way the DoW doesn't have them. 18 U.S. Code § 2384 is right there for all 1600 people or whatever to be arrested and prevented from carrying out their plot.

While everything in her drops seems very damning, the fact that a fed is dropping them on social media and no one is being put in cuffs makes me very skeptical of it.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
71434 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 10:51 am to
Exactly. Where are Patel and Blanche to go after the coup plotters?
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
75290 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 10:53 am to
WWG1WGA. All over again
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
45918 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 10:55 am to
quote:

If these recordings and papers and meetings are all legit, then I don't get why the FBI hasn't already made arrest. If DataRepublican has these documents then there is no way the DoW doesn't have them. 18 U.S. Code § 2384 is right there for all 1600 people or whatever to be arrested and prevented from carrying out their plot.

While everything in her drops seems very damning, the fact that a fed is dropping them on social media and no one is being put in cuffs makes me very skeptical of it.


Indictments being unsealed across the nation today, coincidentally.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486427 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Tbe desperation these people have over this is hilarious.

You mean the people promoting nonsense emotional rhetoric that has no threat to reality, right?

This purported plan makes no sense. I believe the plan is genuine, but those who think it would work are retarded, along with the people who think it's an actual threat to do anything.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
486427 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Indictments being unsealed across the nation today, coincidentally.

About this specific plot, or are you doing the kernel of truth fallacy again?
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
45918 posts
Posted on 10/22/26 at 11:07 am to
quote:

I believe the plan is genuine,


Of course it's genuine. And that's what the threads are about. You spamming the threads like a child will not change that. And again, these people are not just a bunch of children sitting around hatching nonsensical plans. They are people who are highly educated and they are backed by serious people with a lot of money.

Your shillery is obvious. You're calling DR a larper while trying to insist that the people actually devising these plans you admit are real are, in fact, larping, rather than being serious.

There are billionaires, national security officers, governors of states, retired military generals, et al involved in these "unserious plans" you are spamming the threads over. Grow up.
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15 16 ... 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram