
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Report: Thousands of new docs point to a diabolical CIA color revolution after midterms…
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:42 pm to Poboy1911
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:42 pm to Poboy1911
This is one instance when I love the phased rollout that DataRepublican is rolling with here. As people try to get out in front of this stuff it is going to blow up in their faces as she continues to drop more afterwards. It's already happened with Washington Post and it will happen with this stupid bitch too.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:45 pm to BoarEd
No one is derailing the thread. Slotkin mentioned a “national security incident” to justify invoking martial law or some sort of suspension of an election.
Your boy interrupts network TV laughtrack slop like three months ago to try and rile Joe and Jane Citizen up to some sort of Chinese plot to steal elections and it goes over like the turd in the punchbowl. So now we’ve moved on the DataRepublican getting her Dept. of War psyop taking points trying to convince us the left is going to steal it so that’s why Daddy will have to invoke martial law.
Again, you don’t believe this- you’re a bad faith actor engaging is disinformation. But placekicker and cajunangelle are retarded and believe what you and DR present in the OP.
It’s perfectly fine for me to shine a light on it for them and the lurkers.
Your boy interrupts network TV laughtrack slop like three months ago to try and rile Joe and Jane Citizen up to some sort of Chinese plot to steal elections and it goes over like the turd in the punchbowl. So now we’ve moved on the DataRepublican getting her Dept. of War psyop taking points trying to convince us the left is going to steal it so that’s why Daddy will have to invoke martial law.
Again, you don’t believe this- you’re a bad faith actor engaging is disinformation. But placekicker and cajunangelle are retarded and believe what you and DR present in the OP.
It’s perfectly fine for me to shine a light on it for them and the lurkers.
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 8:50 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If you commit a criminal act or use taxpayer dollars in a way that violates the law, you should be held accountable.
I don't see the problem with this statement
Haven’t heard her calling for Ilhan to be prosecuted yet. Did I miss that?
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:50 pm to Timeoday
Fearmongering all you got left? Internals must be looking real bad.
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 8:51 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:59 pm to Poboy1911
quote:Factually incorrect by a landslide but you've been conditioned to think so. The left didn't ban the right from social media platforms because they were in the minority, as if that was the case, the majority would have drowned them out naturally. Voices had to be stifled to make you think you were alone, different, and wrong.
Democrats outnumber Republicans by default
The hardest thing to decipher with the left is which is which, as there are three types:
1. Evil - examples are these people named by datarepublican et al.
2. Idiots - boosie and SFP, enough said.
3. Naive - these people just don't want to believe the others could be so evil and will deny reality to continue to live in their fantasy world.
Some need to be culled, others aren't bad people but inherently contribute to bad things and of those people, there's hope for some but for people like boosie or SFP, they're fricked.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 9:06 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
No one is derailing the thread.
You're trying your best, but I'm going to keep the thread on topic. Sorry about it, but the thread isn't about Trump's address, as much as I'm sure you would like for it to be.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 9:28 pm to BoarEd
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
DataRepublican @DataRepublican just confirmed the quiet part out loud: Illinois Governor JB Pritzker @GovPritzker is explicitly named in the videos as one of only two governors willing to green-light the “illegitimacy memo”—a playbook for declaring a duly elected President illegitimate after the midterms so Democrat governors can claim they are the only legitimate U.S. authority.
This isn’t abstract “resistance.” NSL4A (the retired military and national security officials operationalizing the plan) and Pritzker’s own Governors Safeguarding Democracy group have been working the same sequence of redlines, including treating lawful federal pushback against coordinated protests as proof of illegitimacy. Add the funding layer—his sister’s role in the Democracy Funders Network—and the coordination stops looking coincidental.
Imported regime-change tactics, billionaire governors, and ex-military networks drafting the conditions under which states nullify federal authority: that is the actual document trail.
DataRepublican has the receipts
Posted on 10/21/26 at 9:45 pm to BoarEd
quote:
They continue to seed the narrative just as the game plan DataRepublican has exposed says they will. They call this "pre bunking."
Btw, someone slowed this down to Slippin' Jimmy speed, what she actually said. And they have now filed an ethics complaint against her for this shite.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 10/21/26 at 9:50 pm to BoarEd
quote:
BoarEd
What do you know about the illegitimacy memo? Ref, datarepublican exposing pritzker. It may need its own thread.
Edit: Nvm see you just posted it above.
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 10:16 pm to DeBoar
For now it's just what she has said in a comment. Unless I've missed it I haven't heard it in the actual audio files yet. She says there are two of them. Yeah, they'll deserve their own threads once those files drop.
Also, they've said that there are several others that are willing to go along once another state takes the lead.
Also, they've said that there are several others that are willing to go along once another state takes the lead.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 10:28 pm to BoarEd
They have no power constitutionally imo but how I read it is they will band together to prevent and provoke federal power. They already do this but I assume these states as a possible majority will try and overwhelm the federal government. If they try to do such an easy solution is to immediately cut off all federal money and resources. They may want that though as then it rallies their residents against the federal government. Pritzker is an evil pos and I hope he gets indicted in the next two years.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 10:30 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Also, they've said that there are several others that are willing to go along once another state takes the lead.
And the state “taking the lead” will be attempting to usurp power from President Trump (lawfully elected in 2024 and in power until 2028) under the guise of this:
quote:
a playbook for declaring a duly elected President illegitimate after the midterms so Democrat governors can claim they are the only legitimate U.S. authority.
? That’s the premise of this thread?
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 10:31 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 10:36 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
That’s the premise of this thread?
I'm not discussing this with a guy who has lied his arse off and openly attempted to derail the thread, Boosie. If you want to know what the premise of this thread is maybe you should ask the guy who authored the thread.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 10:38 pm to BoarEd
Again, I understand why you don’t want much sunlight or questioning of your faulty premise.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 10:48 pm to boosiebadazz
What has Trump admin done that is illegal? Only corruption I’ve see is the fraud being uncovered that not a single democrat sees to care about. I don’t get it, if or when this fraud shows up in Republican states, it’s all the same, it’s all stealing tax dollars in a crazy way…why would anyone support that? Is that why their so mad at Trump because they support the fraud.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 11:58 pm to AUX3
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
One other thing about the American Color Revolution.
I'm hearing a lot of very sober conservatives saying that there is no there there in the various videos from the @DataRepublican drops, and that these people are LARPers fantasizing about events that can never, ever happen in the USA.
I have two rebuttals to that sentiment:
1. These are serious people. Ex-USAID employees. Admirals and generals. Ex-State Department. Ex-CIA. Big donors. While some of them may look like goofy LARPers on Zoom, IRL they are serious, highly credentialed leftists with skills, education and experience that should not be taken lightly.
2. Underestimate these people at your own peril. "They could never pull this off in the USA!" Oh really? Exhibit A that they absolutely could pull something this extreme off is how they crippled the Trump 45 Presidency with a totally fake, totally fabricated "Trump/Russia Collusion" hoax, a hoax that started at the Oval Office of Mr. Community Organizer himself, Barack Obama.
Do not underestimate these plotters, please.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 4:07 am to BoarEd
It’s difficult to win a war when one refuses to recognize that they are in one.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 4:39 am to TBoy
quote:
So the republicans are going to try to have a coup if they lose.
Ah, yes, those radical, rascally, communist republicans.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 7:30 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
I hope he has the surveillance going on.
Pretty sure he does. But you know how stupid people are and how willingly they will listen to the MSM lies if this "plan" were to be implemented.

Popular
Back to top


0









