
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:03 pm to Lg
quote:
I’m still amazed at the people who believe the vegetable garnered 81 million votes. Are you one of THOSE?
It is called willful suspension of disbelief. The truth is right in front of them.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:04 pm to BoarEd
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
With the November 3 midterms approaching, we’re seeing repeated headlines discussing whether President Trump might invoke the Insurrection Act, declare a national emergency, or even impose martial law.
Look at the chronology over the last 30 days:
- SEPT 23 — THE ATLANTIC: Reports that Trump allies are urging extraordinary emergency measures surrounding the midterms, including martial law.
- SEPT 28 — TIME INTERVIEW: Trump is asked about declaring a national emergency before the elections. He responds: “I don’t rule anything out or in.”
Trump himself raises the Insurrection Act, saying he has never used it but could.
- OCT 1 — USA TODAY: Reports that Trump refuses to rule out invoking the Insurrection Act around the elections.
- OCT 1 — CNN: Devotes coverage to Trump’s remarks and the possibility of deploying military forces domestically.
OCT 1 — PEOPLE: Reports on Trump’s comments concerning ICE at polling places and the Insurrection Act.
- OCT 1–5 — MEDIA SATURATION: A media tracker identifies coverage across 26 outlets discussing Trump’s emergency-powers comments.
- OCT 7 — JUST SECURITY: Publishes a legal analysis explaining why invoking the Insurrection Act would not override restrictions on troops at polling places.
- OCT 8 — BRENNAN CENTER: Republishes the legal analysis, subsequently updating it October 13.
- OCT 16 — AXIOS: Publishes an investigation titled “Trump’s MAGA allies openly discuss martial law,” examining proposals circulating among election activists.
- OCT 16 — BRENNAN CENTER: Publishes another analysis specifically addressing Trump’s emergency powers and their constitutional limitations.
AT LEAST 32 MEDIA COVERAGE INSTANCES IDENTIFIED — AND THAT IS NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE COUNT.
...and it goes on, but this is the part I find relevant to datarepublicans posts
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Does she explain how she got access to phone calls of private parties?
Maybe you should take her to court.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
Why is Biden listed as Obama?
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
who leaked the trump/netanyahu call? still don't know, it would likely compromise anonymous sources.
i mean if the strategy is to get everyone in politics to distrust each other, i hope it works.
i mean if the strategy is to get everyone in politics to distrust each other, i hope it works.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:12 pm to BoarEd
That’s because your petulant manchild has been declaring every election he’s lost as fraudulent since the 2016 Iowa primary
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:14 pm to Poboy1911
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:16 pm to BoarEd
quote:
If you commit a criminal act or use taxpayer dollars in a way that violates the law, you should be held accountable.
I don't see the problem with this statement
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:16 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
That’s because your petulant manchild
quote:
boosiebadazz
Considering you have told nothing but blatant lies throughout this thread, I think we can all agree you are an expert in these matters.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
We already know you don't have a problem with people weaponizing the justice system against Trump and his allies. Only when it goes against your home team Democrats/team insurrectionists is it a problem for you.
I think the point is that he is saying she is part of team traitor. Meaning she's going to wind up in these tapes.
I think the point is that he is saying she is part of team traitor. Meaning she's going to wind up in these tapes.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:20 pm to BoarEd
quote:
I think the point is that he is saying she is part of team traitor. Meaning she's going to wind up in these tapes.
I think the point is to try to deny
quote:
people weaponizing the justice system against Trump and his allies.
actually had this statement apply to the behavior
quote:
If you commit a criminal act or use taxpayer dollars in a way that violates the law, you should be held accountable.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:21 pm to BoarEd
There really is no real evidence though. If there were it would be all over.
I think maga over states Trumps popularity.
I think maga over states Trumps popularity.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
Come on. You know half this board believes anything they read on X if it supports their view. See Q.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:27 pm to DeBoar
Shhh sit back and belive his shitty AI.
Kamala got 75m to Trumps 77.3m.
Kamala got 75m to Trumps 77.3m.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:31 pm to BoarEd
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. They continue to seed the narrative just as the game plan DataRepublican has exposed says they will. They call this "pre bunking."
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 8:31 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:33 pm to BoarEd
Where does your “most important thread of all time” Chinese voter registration buying fit into this narrative?
Was there a reason they cut into primetime network television for that?
Do I need to link it for you?
Was there a reason they cut into primetime network television for that?
Do I need to link it for you?
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:37 pm to BoarEd
greta thunberg's older sister at it again i see. her twitter manager is falling over themself trying to paper over or justify her little 'we should arrest people who work for trump to discourage other people from doing it' psycho statement.
anyway, 'national security incident' can mean a lot of things. You're an elected official, lady. you're supposed to be held to standards. show some fricking receipts.
anyway, 'national security incident' can mean a lot of things. You're an elected official, lady. you're supposed to be held to standards. show some fricking receipts.
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 8:40 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Where does your “most important thread of all time” Chinese voter registration buying fit into this narrative?
Was there a reason they cut into primetime network television for that?
Do I need to link it for you?
So now you've graduated from telling blatant lies to blatantly trying to derail the thread? Grow up, loser.

Popular
Back to top



3








