Started By
Message

Real question today: "Can the officer just shoot the leg?"

Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:11 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57090 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:11 pm
LINK to twitter w/video

quote:

Breaking911
@Breaking911
· 2h

JOURNALIST: "Can an officer shoot the leg? Can they shoot somewhere that would not result in a fatal wound?"

COLUMBUS POLICE CHIEF: "We don't train to shoot the leg because that's a small target. We train to shoot center mass...There was a deadly force threat that was going on."


My favorite reply....

quote:

Howard Wall
@HJWallEcon
·
1h
"Couldn't the officer have just thrown a social worker at her"


Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84060 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:12 pm to
I'm not sure a better reply could be made
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98739 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:13 pm to
Shoot their junk so they can’t reproduce.
Posted by TigersSEC2010
Warren, Michigan
Member since Jan 2010
37355 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:14 pm to
It is terrifying how many people believe shooting the legs is a viable solution. Every time I hear someone make this claim I cringe so hard.
Posted by Sooner5030
Desert Southwest
Member since Sep 2014
1712 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:14 pm to
smaller target results in less accuracy.

which results in small dense objects bouncing around the scene at 1200 feet/second.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64952 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:14 pm to
This is why I laugh at people who are trying to pass off journalists as the new intellectuals. Sure...shoot a perp in the leg, but don't be surprised if they end up bleeding out due to an artery being cut by the bullet as it goes sailing by.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18664 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:15 pm to
To be fair, that girl had a pretty large target on her backside.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101293 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:15 pm to
Muh warning shot!
Posted by Styxion
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2012
1596 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

It is terrifying how many people believe shooting the legs is a viable solution. Every time I hear someone make this claim I cringe so hard.



It's people that have never shot a gun. They think all shots are amazingly accurate.
Posted by BeepNode
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2014
10005 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

It is terrifying how many people believe shooting the legs is a viable solution. Every time I hear someone make this claim I cringe so hard.


Because the current tactic is working so well..
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57090 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

It is terrifying how many people believe shooting the legs is a viable solution. Every time I hear someone make this claim I cringe so hard.
They might as well say "everything I know about guns, I learned from the movies".
Posted by rattlebucket
SELA
Member since Feb 2009
11423 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:15 pm to
Even if you do hit the leg, there’s this big ole femoral artery that would kill them just as dead if hit
Posted by BeepNode
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2014
10005 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:17 pm to
Also, that girl’s center mass was in her butt.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57090 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Also, that girl’s center mass was in her butt.
How dare you talk about a sweet 16 year old child that way.
Posted by VanRIch
Wherever
Member since Sep 2007
10367 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Can they shoot somewhere that would not result in a fatal wound?


Even if this wasn’t one of the stupidest suggestions ever, have you ever heard of the femoral artery? Lots of leg injuries are fatal because of severing this. Good grief these people are dumb.
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
11794 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:21 pm to


quote:

aim small, miss small, aim big, hit big
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:24 pm to
In my opinion if deadly force is required, it should be deadly. In that situation the big girl was in the process of using deadly force. That threat needed to be ended quickly and efficiently.

Wounding someone does not end the threat.
Posted by DomePatrol1980
Member since Mar 2018
921 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:27 pm to
How'd that work out for Sean Taylor?
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8174 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:28 pm to
I believe the Supreme Court says you can’t shoot to wound
Posted by tucoco
Las Vegas
Member since Mar 2021
6310 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:33 pm to
She should have been shot, but you don't have to shoot someone 4 times or more. Lol
This post was edited on 4/21/21 at 4:36 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram