- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Question on Twitter about why unvaxed blood seems cherished by blood banks
Posted on 4/20/22 at 3:06 am
Posted on 4/20/22 at 3:06 am
I found this question interesting as I've personally noticed this same phenomenon myself while donating.
In my experience earlier this month, I identified as a pure blood whilst taking the rapid pass pre-donor questionnaire, and then about 2 business days later I got a call verifying that I was pureblood (think she used a different term tho). I asked why this follow up - are they going to arrest me hahaha (but I'm genuinely kinda freaked out by this) and she says no, not at all, they tagged my blood based on its type and also my survey answer (thus the follow up call) and hope to use it in the manner that Twitter lady spelled out. I said fine and considered making a smartaleck comment, then thought better of it.
In my experience earlier this month, I identified as a pure blood whilst taking the rapid pass pre-donor questionnaire, and then about 2 business days later I got a call verifying that I was pureblood (think she used a different term tho). I asked why this follow up - are they going to arrest me hahaha (but I'm genuinely kinda freaked out by this) and she says no, not at all, they tagged my blood based on its type and also my survey answer (thus the follow up call) and hope to use it in the manner that Twitter lady spelled out. I said fine and considered making a smartaleck comment, then thought better of it.
This post was edited on 4/20/22 at 3:15 am
8
Posted on 4/20/22 at 3:14 am to SirWinston
quote:
pureblood (think she used a different term tho)
Gee, you think?
Posted on 4/20/22 at 3:14 am to Mo Jeaux
Smart ppl*
Posted on 4/20/22 at 3:18 am to momentoftruth87
Yall are focusing on woke semantics (which I was joking about anyway) and ignoring my actual question.
Posted on 4/20/22 at 3:30 am to SirWinston
quote:
Yall are focusing on woke semantics (which I was joking about anyway) and ignoring my actual question.
You didn't ask a question.
This post was edited on 4/20/22 at 3:32 am
Posted on 4/20/22 at 3:34 am to BoarEd
Le sigh. You're getting caught up in semantics too. Is there a full moon tonight or something?
I am (quite obviously) channeling Jennifer's question.
I am (quite obviously) channeling Jennifer's question.
quote:
What's wrong with vaxed blood?
This post was edited on 4/20/22 at 3:35 am
Posted on 4/20/22 at 3:41 am to SirWinston
quote:
Le sigh. You're getting caught up in semantics too.
No, I was pointing out that you didn't ask a question. If you expect the laymen on this board to only respond to your OP if they know why (medically) that unvaxxed blood is preferred by blood banks, and people merely expressing their opinions aren't allowed to share those opinions, this thread is dead from the jump.
Yes, we all know that the vaccine is bad news. As to the specifics of why, I don't know, so I can't answer the Twitter user's question.
Why do you think unvaxxed blood is preferred?
Posted on 4/20/22 at 4:04 am to BoarEd
I'll help,,,
Vaxxed blood is contaminated. As well as potentially killing someone it could cause heart problems and make people sick, also not to mention sterility. If you have natural antibodies with no vax they may chain you up and keep you. The faux vaccines are a bad idea. There were many threads here on this.
Vaxxed blood is contaminated. As well as potentially killing someone it could cause heart problems and make people sick, also not to mention sterility. If you have natural antibodies with no vax they may chain you up and keep you. The faux vaccines are a bad idea. There were many threads here on this.
This post was edited on 4/20/22 at 4:06 am
Posted on 4/20/22 at 4:06 am to SirWinston
I don’t know your answer, but there’s obviously something screwed up going on. The question is, will we ever know, or is the cover up that good?
Posted on 4/20/22 at 4:36 am to SirWinston
quote:
I asked why this follow up
They are verifying contact info of the non-compliant. She is doing nothing with the database, however, the people who get the database, well they are planning their next move.
Posted on 4/20/22 at 4:52 am to SirWinston
The dumbfricks are going to slowly realize they may have fricked up. Probably not a good feeling at all.
Posted on 4/20/22 at 5:50 am to CCT
quote:
Vaxxed blood is contaminated. As well as potentially killing someone it could cause heart problems and make people sick, also not to mention sterility. If you have natural antibodies with no vax they may chain you up and keep you. The faux vaccines are a bad idea. There were many threads here on this.
Posted on 4/20/22 at 6:59 am to SirWinston
quote:
What's wrong with vaxed blood?
The obvious reason is that natural antibodies actually work against the Omicron variant and the vax does nothing except likely triggering additional response from the recipient's immune system right when they don't need it.
Aren't monoclonal antibodies no longer available under emergency authorization? Here's your workaround.
Bonus points for OP if he's AB- or O- and unvaxxed.
Posted on 4/20/22 at 7:02 am to SirWinston
CNN will not waste resources on investigating this.
More like they will do everything to disprove it.
More like they will do everything to disprove it.
Posted on 4/20/22 at 7:03 am to Bulldogblitz
quote:
They are verifying contact info of the non-compliant.
Bingo! The follow up was data collection and verification. He’s on the list and verified with a blue check mark now.
In all seriousness, is there any truth to un-vaccinated blood being cherished or sought? Or, is this an identify the non-compliant exercise? I trust nothing at this point
Posted on 4/20/22 at 7:56 am to SWCBonfire
quote:
The obvious reason is that natural antibodies actually work against the Omicron variant and the vax does nothing
But that doesn't answer the question, "Why can't they use blood of vaxxed that also had covid?"
Posted on 4/20/22 at 7:58 am to SirWinston
Purebloods are simply superior people to whatever trash makes up the dirty bloods
Its that easy
Its that easy
Posted on 4/20/22 at 8:44 am to deathvalleytiger10
Because the blood of the vaxed has been corrupted and is harmful if used by blood banks?
Posted on 4/20/22 at 8:57 am to beulahland
is this an informed consent thing? if you give someone vaxxed blood without their consent, could that be a legal issue for the hospital?
Posted on 4/20/22 at 10:32 am to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
The obvious reason is that natural antibodies actually work against the Omicron variant and the vax does nothing
quote:
But that doesn't answer the question, "Why can't they use blood of vaxxed that also had covid?"
An acquaintance of mine heard that blood banks were looking for plasma donations from those who'd recovered from covid. Treatments for ICU covid patients can be derived from the aforementioned plasma.
When he called the blood bank to enquire, they ended up refusing his donation, because he'd been double jabbed about three months prior to contracting and recovering from covid. They told him that the pureblood immunity and vaxxed immunity (not their terminology) were two different things.
If this doesn't convince the remaining purebloods (and parents of children under 5) to stay away from the Jab, then nothing else will.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News