- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Protecting the anonymity of those who report
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:22 am
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:22 am
Do we want to protect the anonymity of government whistleblowers, callers to crime stoppers or reports to child protection? Does the accused have the right to face the accuser in all of these instances?
14
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:24 am to NorthTiger
If the WB qualifies to be protected. Sure.
In this case, he does not. The Dems are abusing WB statutes to protect a partisan hack and damage the president politically.
In this case, he does not. The Dems are abusing WB statutes to protect a partisan hack and damage the president politically.
This post was edited on 11/11/19 at 11:26 am
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:25 am to NorthTiger
quote:
Do we want to protect the anonymity of government whistleblowers,
This is not the same as
quote:
callers to crime stoppers
But no. You can not be allowed to make claims from behind closed curtains and ruin people without the risks that comes with it.
That is KGB shite.
quote:
Does the accused have the right to face the accuser in all of these instances?
YES! and Should
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:27 am to BobBoucher
I would like to add that in a court case the person that reported the theft etc. does not need to be there to get a conviction. They just point the cops in the right direction. IF they are a witness that needs to be called then, they most certainly will be faced by the defendant.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:31 am to NorthTiger
quote:
Does the accused have the right to face the accuser in all of these instances?
Read the Constitution.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:34 am to NorthTiger
quote:
Does the accused have the right to face the accuser in all of these instances?
Yes. But, the case before us today does not involve a "whistleblower" but a leaker.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:35 am to NorthTiger
quote:
government whistleblowers
quote:
callers to crime stoppers
quote:
reports to child protection
sesame street can help us learn
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:52 am to omegaman66
quote:
I would like to add that in a court case the person that reported the theft etc
There has to be a theft, etc.
THAT has to be established first, correct?
Posted on 11/11/19 at 11:58 am to NorthTiger
However the Obama administration handled whistleblowers is how whistleblowers should be handled.
After all, there was never a smidgen of corruption in his administration.
After all, there was never a smidgen of corruption in his administration.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:02 pm to NorthTiger
That is not what the statute calls for. The WB statute is about protecting a true WB from repercussions professionally not hiding their identity.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:02 pm to NorthTiger
The message the left is giving the right is that anonymous attacks are acceptable.
The left will learn a hard lesson, the same way they learned a lesson from unleashing #metoo and #believeher. Bye bye Al Franken. Bye bye Weinstein. Bye bye Anthony Wiener.
The left will learn a hard lesson, the same way they learned a lesson from unleashing #metoo and #believeher. Bye bye Al Franken. Bye bye Weinstein. Bye bye Anthony Wiener.
This post was edited on 11/11/19 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:05 pm to NorthTiger
quote:nope.
Do we want to protect the anonymity of government whistleblowers,
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:26 pm to NorthTiger
When you can WB with no direct knowledge and with the ability to keep from being criticized, then you can lie about anything you want without consequences.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:29 pm to NorthTiger
When a reporter says 'sources say' it means 'I just made up this shite.'
This is not a joke. This is what happens with "journalists" today.
This is not a joke. This is what happens with "journalists" today.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:29 pm to NorthTiger
Yes if it is a real whistleblower
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:31 pm to NorthTiger
I saw you rob a liquor store and called the police. Good luck.
Posted on 11/11/19 at 12:32 pm to NorthTiger
quote:
Does the accused have the right to face the accuser
Yes. Always. Every time.
You have the right to directly confront and examine you accuser. Without that right, there is absolutely no possibility of a fair trial.
This post was edited on 11/11/19 at 12:36 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News