- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Prosecutors Claim Tucker Carlson's January 6 Footage Lacks Context
Posted on 3/13/23 at 2:53 pm to cajunangelle
Posted on 3/13/23 at 2:53 pm to cajunangelle
Then they should be thrilled by the promises from McCarthy to release all the footage so it's available to the public. We can be up to our eyeballs in context.
This post was edited on 3/13/23 at 3:37 pm
0
Posted on 3/13/23 at 2:54 pm to cajunangelle
“The televised footage lacks the context of what occurred before and after the footage. Chansley entered the building as part of a violent crowd that gained access as a result of Pezzola’s destruction of a window and he traveled with Pezzola during the initial breach,” the filing states.
Ok so release all the footage unedited . Let us decide . Bet they wont .
Ok so release all the footage unedited . Let us decide . Bet they wont .
Posted on 3/13/23 at 2:57 pm to Decatur
quote:
Decatur
this is dumb, even for you
Posted on 3/13/23 at 3:02 pm to Decatur
quote:
I think some missing context is they were escorting him out of the building.
You don't even believe that
Posted on 3/13/23 at 3:02 pm to cajunangelle
The only thing that is needed to know is did the prosecutors/government give the video footage to the defendants as required by law or did they withhold that information?
Posted on 3/13/23 at 3:06 pm to bbvdd
quote:
The only thing that is needed to know is did the prosecutors/government give the video footage to the defendants as required by law or did they withhold that information?
Chansley’s attorneys say they weren’t given all the footage. The government says they did. I’m guessing the government cut this part out for “national security concerns” and will hide behind that.
Posted on 3/13/23 at 3:15 pm to FredBear
When they state that the 10 seconds of missing footage implicated an evacuation route and it takes place near the end of Chansley’s time in the building, and the footage shows officers leading him from the front and behind, I think the only reasonable inference here is that particular footage shows them escorting him out of the building.
Posted on 3/13/23 at 3:19 pm to Decatur
quote:
10 seconds of missing footage implicated an evacuation route
And you’re dumb enough to actually believe this.
Posted on 3/13/23 at 3:21 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
The government could murder Decatur's family on film and he'd still defend the government.
As long as the "government" was on the left
Posted on 3/13/23 at 3:22 pm to cajunangelle
Prosecutors and Context
Could it be relative to context that the following definitions apply:
Context = government lies
Context = spin
Context = “their” truth
Could it be relative to context that the following definitions apply:
Context = government lies
Context = spin
Context = “their” truth
Posted on 3/13/23 at 3:29 pm to cajunangelle
Meanwhile, in a related prosecution the government attempted to hide an agent's presence on a source report, attempted to hide destruction of 338 pieces of evidence, attempted to hide the fact they spied on privileged communications, then had a complete meltdown when these issues were brought forward in court, in front of a jury.
Posted on 3/13/23 at 3:32 pm to Decatur
quote:
It is true that a sole officer, who was trying to de-escalate the situation, was with Chansley as he made his way to the Senate floor after initially breaching the Chamber, as the televised footage reflects.6 But the televised footage fails to show that Chansley subsequently refused to be escorted out by this lone officer and instead left the Capitol only after additional officers arrived and forcibly escorted him out.
That's not what the video showed at all.
Posted on 3/13/23 at 3:34 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:What did the video show? I haven't watched it as an FYI, but is it possible that Carlson edited out the parts he didn't want people to see? Or there are videos of some of the other stuff he's accused of that, again, Carlson simply didn't show?
That's not what the video showed at all.
This post was edited on 3/13/23 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 3/13/23 at 3:55 pm to cajunangelle
Isn't that irrelevant, if the prosecutors withheld the video from the defense?
Posted on 3/13/23 at 4:02 pm to cajunangelle
What's laughable about this is the idea that anyone has seen all of this footage. The claim is that there are 40,000 hours of security footage.
40,000 hours is over 4.5 years worth of recorded vidoe. Even if 100 agents were assigned to review it, it would be a full week of viewing 24 hours a day.
The committee went to the footage that they wanted to see and cherry-picked it no differently than Fox News. The only difference is whether you trust Fox or the Kangaroo Court.
For me, it's a push.
What I find even more laughable is the complete lack of interest in this footage by the other major networks. The government is locking-up "insurrectionests" and the vast majority in our "watchdog media" is nodding along like members of the Reich Press Chamber.
40,000 hours is over 4.5 years worth of recorded vidoe. Even if 100 agents were assigned to review it, it would be a full week of viewing 24 hours a day.
The committee went to the footage that they wanted to see and cherry-picked it no differently than Fox News. The only difference is whether you trust Fox or the Kangaroo Court.
For me, it's a push.
What I find even more laughable is the complete lack of interest in this footage by the other major networks. The government is locking-up "insurrectionests" and the vast majority in our "watchdog media" is nodding along like members of the Reich Press Chamber.
This post was edited on 3/14/23 at 9:19 am
Posted on 3/13/23 at 5:26 pm to cajunangelle
The same GD excuse the marxist goons who choose to be blind to justice
use
Judge needs debarring immediately.
When a HOAX is perpetrated the video record necessarily must be investigated
RELEASE THE J6 PRISONERS of marxist goon j6 FALSE NARRATIVE
THAT LIE IS DONE AND OVER - A PART OF THE ELECTION THIEVERY by the marxist goon Democrats.
use
Judge needs debarring immediately.
When a HOAX is perpetrated the video record necessarily must be investigated
RELEASE THE J6 PRISONERS of marxist goon j6 FALSE NARRATIVE
THAT LIE IS DONE AND OVER - A PART OF THE ELECTION THIEVERY by the marxist goon Democrats.
Posted on 3/13/23 at 5:42 pm to cajunangelle
quote:Every one of the sons of bitches should be disbarred.
Federal prosecutors have made a claim about the January 6 footage
Posted on 3/13/23 at 5:52 pm to Decatur
quote:
When they state that the 10 seconds of missing footage implicated an evacuation route and it takes place near the end of Chansley’s time in the building, and the footage shows officers leading him from the front and behind, I think the only reasonable inference here is that particular footage shows them escorting him out of the building.
Yet the prosecution never mentioned this prior to this footage being released.
You liars banked on the groomers keeping the House and this video never seeing the light of day.
Posted on 3/13/23 at 7:31 pm to cajunangelle
They should show us all the video footage of this “before and after” that provided this “Context”. Our govt is railroading innocent people to keep their control.
Posted on 3/13/23 at 7:41 pm to cajunangelle
Mister Pot, please describe Mister Kettle
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News