- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/22/19 at 5:02 pm to texridder
quote:
You're full of shite. You attacked Hank for saying that Biden was not the only one calling for Shokin to be ousted.
You go ahead and fight that strawman.
Hell. Even Hank didn't claim I did that. And I was arguing WITH Hank.
I get that you'll never admit it
But dude. Your pants are around your ankles. Pull em up
Posted on 9/22/19 at 5:03 pm to texridder
quote:
P.S. Biden's 6 hour bluff happened in the first week of December 2015. So that means the EU was calling for Shokin to be fired a month before Biden went to Kiev.
Do you need to read my first post AGAIN?
I said there were links about Biden talking about Shokin and wanting him gone dating back to early Nov/Late Oct.
Are you really THIS stupid?
Nah. You just can't admit anything...……..ever
It's pathetic
Posted on 9/22/19 at 5:17 pm to jrodLSUke
Just as a head's up because I know this dude well.
He ENTERED the thread whining that I was being "dishonest" with my cut line on my search even though I actually had spelled out why that cut line was done.
THEN, he claimed that I in fact, did NOT explain why it was done in my first post(which was just weird because, well, the post is still there).
So, now that THAT narrative has blown the frick up, look for Tex to completely PIVOT.
Now, Tex will want to focus on any and all mentions of Shokin prior to November...…..which is fine...……...except he'll NEVER admit that he was wrong about my date constraints.
Oh, and, the reality is, I was really surprised to not find more mentions. I figure hey, the company hired Biden's son in 2014...……..so, there would probably have been some chatter shortly after that.
He ENTERED the thread whining that I was being "dishonest" with my cut line on my search even though I actually had spelled out why that cut line was done.
THEN, he claimed that I in fact, did NOT explain why it was done in my first post(which was just weird because, well, the post is still there).
So, now that THAT narrative has blown the frick up, look for Tex to completely PIVOT.
Now, Tex will want to focus on any and all mentions of Shokin prior to November...…..which is fine...……...except he'll NEVER admit that he was wrong about my date constraints.
Oh, and, the reality is, I was really surprised to not find more mentions. I figure hey, the company hired Biden's son in 2014...……..so, there would probably have been some chatter shortly after that.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 5:19 pm to ShortyRob
You guys want to have some REAL fun?
Hunter Biden was hired in the spring of 2014.
I wonder how many "Shokin bad" links one can find PRIOR to THAT date?
EDIT TO ADD. My bad. Shokin took the position in Feb 2015. So, we need to search after that.
Hunter Biden was hired in the spring of 2014.
I wonder how many "Shokin bad" links one can find PRIOR to THAT date?
EDIT TO ADD. My bad. Shokin took the position in Feb 2015. So, we need to search after that.
This post was edited on 9/22/19 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 9/22/19 at 5:19 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
So it's ok that Biden requested that this guy be fired, but it's not OK that Trump asked that the situation be investigated?
I think it has more to do with Rudy G admitting they wanted it investigated to benefit the Trump 2020 campaign
Posted on 9/22/19 at 5:30 pm to ShortyRob
So. I've run several searches to discover this western Anti-Shokin sentiment.
Dude took his position in Feb 2015. A search from Feb 2015 - 1 October just yields a bunch of "this dude is in X position in the Ukraine" type links.
I mean. I'm sure if I click ALL the links, I'll find some anti-Shokin stuff. But, yeah. It ain't exactly prominent.
Basically, as you add days to the search, you FINALLY start to pick up some anti-Shokin chatter that...……...oh so coincidentally, seems to coincide nicely with the lead up to Biden's threat.
But hey. I guess the left will expect me to believe that prior to his December threats, Biden hadn't talked to a soul about Shokin.
Dude took his position in Feb 2015. A search from Feb 2015 - 1 October just yields a bunch of "this dude is in X position in the Ukraine" type links.
I mean. I'm sure if I click ALL the links, I'll find some anti-Shokin stuff. But, yeah. It ain't exactly prominent.
Basically, as you add days to the search, you FINALLY start to pick up some anti-Shokin chatter that...……...oh so coincidentally, seems to coincide nicely with the lead up to Biden's threat.
But hey. I guess the left will expect me to believe that prior to his December threats, Biden hadn't talked to a soul about Shokin.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 5:31 pm to ShortyRob
At this point in the thread, everyone can see that they will defend The Party no matter what.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 5:31 pm to bmy
quote:Well, I mean. It does benefit Trump's campaign that Biden was OBVIOUSLY corrupt on this.
I think it has more to do with Rudy G admitting they wanted it investigated to benefit the Trump 2020 campaign
But, that's sort of unavoidable
Posted on 9/22/19 at 5:36 pm to bmy
quote:
I think it has more to do with Rudy G admitting they wanted it investigated to benefit the Trump 2020 campaign
No he admitted it would benefit. Which is obviously true.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 5:46 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
No he admitted it would benefit. Which is obviously true.
Exactly.
I mean. What else are you going to say?
Yeah. If it turns out my opponent is a fricking crook, that'll help me.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 5:57 pm to texridder
quote:
I'll show you how stupid you are
You don’t have the capacity. That’s not an insult, just a fact you need to accept.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 6:03 pm to ShortyRob
Removed
This post was edited on 9/22/19 at 7:53 pm
Posted on 9/22/19 at 6:25 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:I don't think you intended to respond to me
jimmy the leg
Posted on 9/22/19 at 7:47 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I don't think you intended to respond to me
I did not. Sorry about that. Obviously I goofed.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 7:52 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Baby Biden was not under investigation. The investigation addressed a Ukrainian company for which he served on the board
So according to your logic, Himmler wasn't under investigation, he just served on the board of the Nazis. To apply your narrative, Himmler's dad getting Hitler removed in order to save his son (and subsequently have his son rewarded with power and money by the Nazis) is no biggie. After all, at least seemingly according to your take, there is "plausible deniability." It is an analogy that seems to mirror your quoted post.
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:46 am to ShortyRob
quote:you cannot conceivably be this stupid. Over the last six months or so, however, I have seen your objective analysis rapidly deteriorate.
I get it. You believe that a random Ukrainian company reached out and hired the son of the vice President of the United States to a job he never previously held qualifications for at magnitudes greater salary than he had ever made and it's complete coincidence that a mere year later that vice president got a prosecutor fired who was fricking with that company
Baby Biden was brought onto the Board of Directors because he was well-connected. I said this several pages ago. I have no doubt that they thought they would receive some sort of quid pro quo. That is the only reason companies put these people on their boards of directors.
I have expressed no opinion whatsoever as to whether Joe Biden was influenced by his son’s position, because (again) it is utterly irrelevant. US policy (and that of our allies) favored Shokin’s removal, regardless of Biden‘s personal preferences.
This post was edited on 9/23/19 at 12:48 am
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:51 am to AggieHank86
quote:
US policy (and that of our allies) favored Shokin’s removal, regardless of Biden‘s personal preferences.
And yet the Trump tower meeting that only involved Donalds son . . . . was investigated why, again?
Posted on 9/23/19 at 12:57 am to RobbBobb
quote:And you people accuse me of derailing threads. This has absolutely nothing to do with anything. But you’ll certainly insist otherwise, so I will answer.
And yet the Trump tower meeting that only involved Donalds son . . . . was investigated why, again?
I have no idea. I said from the beginning that the tower meeting was a non-issue and demonstrated nothing competence of Trump’s campaign for even TAKING the meeting.
This post was edited on 9/23/19 at 10:01 am
Posted on 9/23/19 at 1:02 am to AggieHank86
quote:
and demonstrated nothing competence of Trump’s campaign for even TAKING the meeting.
And yet they threatened his son with prosecution?
But Trump, doing as he was done to (remember being taught that in Sun school), is wrong for going after Biden and his son? As my great, beloved grandmother always told me "wont be shite, if you don't start shite"
Page 8 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News