- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: President TRUMP has raised serious questions about Joe Biden.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:06 am to davyjones
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:06 am to davyjones
quote:
An explanation of the alleged corruption
The guy was ousted because Biden and his globalist allies wanted him out of the way. It was a total political hit job by the socialists.
In CommieHank’s world view, all they need to do is throw out the usual socialist buzzwords to condemn someone they don’t agree with: corruption, collusion, obstruction, etc.
0
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:06 am to AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
Did you seriously post a link of another nation REACTING to Biden getting the dude fired as support for your earlier argument that they all wanted him fired BEFORE Biden did it?
Come on man. That's just lazy
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:08 am to AggieHank86
quote:
HOLY shite, you fricking moron. I agreed two pages ago that he should have recused himself. This is like trying to have a discussion with small children.
While simultaneously trying to pretend that Biden didn't do what he self evidently did and defending it as nothing more than a failure in optics.
Yes. You are correct. You are arguing like a child.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:11 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Baby Biden was not under investigation. The investigation addressed a Ukrainian company for which he served on the board.
The hair, you are splitting it.
quote:
The US government (acting through Joe Biden) called for Shokin’s removal because Shokin was corrupt.
Can you give us an example of this corruption? Also, when does the state department tell other countries who their assistant DAs (that's essentially what we're talking about) need to be?
quote:
pretty much every western country was calling for his removal.
Can we see a contemporaneous link?
You're msm contrived cover story is bullshite, fyi
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:13 am to More&Les
AggieHank honestly has no right whatsoever to EVER grip about his reputation on this board ever again after this complete shite show of a thread on his part
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:16 am to ShortyRob
quote:
AggieHank honestly has no right whatsoever to EVER grip about his reputation on this board ever again after this complete shite show of a thread on his part
As if he had standing prior to.... lol
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:20 am to AggieHank86
Lol, yet here you are... arguing with everyone about the merits of firing the prosecutor, as if that’s what this is really about.
You can’t have it both ways.
You can’t have it both ways.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:24 am to More&Les
A lot of people don't even realize Google has a custom time frame search feature. But it does.
So. I did it. I searched Ukraine Shokin from Jan 1 of 2014 thru 1 Feb 2016(he was ousted in Feb).
That search yielded several hits from many places talking about him not being a good guy. I wouldn't say it was a LOT of hits, but it netted some.
So, I noticed that a few of this hits were Biden being "mad" about the dude. Those hits seems to show up late in 2015.
So I backed my search up to before the first hit mentioning Biden. (I cut it at 1 Nov 2015
Blammo. Hank's entire story went to shite. For all practical purposes, a mere 3 months before the dude was ousted AFTER Biden got involved...…...the dude was pretty much an internet ghost.
There are many hits where his name is mentioned. But this whole narrative that the "West wanted him gone"? Well. If they did. They didn't tell the press!
This Google search runs up to Nov 2015. Dude was ousted in Feb.
Look at all those nations calling for his ouster!!!
LINK
So. I did it. I searched Ukraine Shokin from Jan 1 of 2014 thru 1 Feb 2016(he was ousted in Feb).
That search yielded several hits from many places talking about him not being a good guy. I wouldn't say it was a LOT of hits, but it netted some.
So, I noticed that a few of this hits were Biden being "mad" about the dude. Those hits seems to show up late in 2015.
So I backed my search up to before the first hit mentioning Biden. (I cut it at 1 Nov 2015
Blammo. Hank's entire story went to shite. For all practical purposes, a mere 3 months before the dude was ousted AFTER Biden got involved...…...the dude was pretty much an internet ghost.
There are many hits where his name is mentioned. But this whole narrative that the "West wanted him gone"? Well. If they did. They didn't tell the press!
This Google search runs up to Nov 2015. Dude was ousted in Feb.
Look at all those nations calling for his ouster!!!
LINK
This post was edited on 9/22/19 at 11:26 am
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:26 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Lol, yet here you are... arguing with everyone about the merits of firing the prosecutor, as if that’s what this is really about.
Check out my post about Google time bracketed search results.
Just
at HankPosted on 9/22/19 at 11:28 am to More&Les
Right now, Hank is desperately Googling to find a link that pre-dates Biden making an issue of Shokin.
He's gonna need a new computer keyboard.
He's gonna need a new computer keyboard.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:32 am to ShortyRob
quote:
CommieHank
I have never seen someone so committed to intellectual dishonesty in defense of The Party.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:32 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Millions of Americans are blissfully unaware of the name of the V of this country.
Apparently, so was Google in this case.
An intellectually honest poster would come back to this thread and admit your story just fell the frick apart.
I mean. You aren't going to. I know this.
But, if you were intellectually honest you would.
This post was edited on 9/22/19 at 11:35 am
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:33 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
Damn whistles just ain't what they used to be.
But what about the "dog whistles?" MSM loves that term.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:34 am to jrodLSUke
quote:It still is pretty funny that he doesn't just admit he's a full on DailyKos type lefty.
I have never seen someone so committed to intellectual dishonesty in defense of The Party.
But hey. At least he isn't as bad as some of the pure trolls on the board.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:34 am to SirWinston
quote:
Muh emoluments only applies to Trump?
Mmm... omelettes.
Who's up for BRUNCH?!?!
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:41 am to ShortyRob
He thinks he’s fooling us with his semi-neutral opening post followed by pages of argumentative, leftist dilusion.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:47 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
He thinks he’s fooling us with his semi-neutral opening post followed by pages of argumentative, leftist dilusion.
I'll reader's digest this.
All Hank did was come in an parrot the Democratic defensive talking point but worse, he acted like somehow, unlike the rest of us dolts, he knew this information independent of the Democrats telling him what his argument was.
When asked for contemporaneous links of his assertions, he linked a link that came AFTER the firing! THAT my friends was all I needed as his "tell".
Honestly, until he did that, I assumed that Bident had likely chummed the waters in advance of the firing so it may have been covered in the press.
But, LOL. The ENTIRE frickING INTERNET was pretty much dead silent on the subject until Biden brought it up himself!
If Hank hadn't fricked up with that lazy assed link, I probably wouldn't have even done an time constrained search.
Now, his hiding from the thread is AS INFORMATIVE about how he KNEW when he entered the thread that he was being a parrot which honestly, is just sad for a guy who constantly whines about why people assume he is what he quite obviously is.
This post was edited on 9/22/19 at 11:51 am
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:50 am to ShortyRob
I just want to finish by saying...….
Hank. You may be a lawyer and, in a courtroom, due to me just maybe not knowing a specific legal area, you'd have the advantage.
But, even THEN, I'd see through you because your approach to argument is exceedingly one dimensional.
Outside the courtroom. NEVER, just NEVER think you're going to slip by faking knowledge with me. I'll catch that shite 100% of the time.
Hank. You may be a lawyer and, in a courtroom, due to me just maybe not knowing a specific legal area, you'd have the advantage.
But, even THEN, I'd see through you because your approach to argument is exceedingly one dimensional.
Outside the courtroom. NEVER, just NEVER think you're going to slip by faking knowledge with me. I'll catch that shite 100% of the time.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 11:59 am to ShortyRob
Interesting Google results. I am a bit surprised, but I do not care enough to argue or to spend time looking for contradicting articles.
On page one, I quoted the former US ambassador to Ukraine, indicating that the US wanted him gone for policy reasons long before Biden’s actions. That is not good enough for you, because you believe that such matters are always handled in the press, rather than behind the scenes. I disagree. Such is life.
On page one, I quoted the former US ambassador to Ukraine, indicating that the US wanted him gone for policy reasons long before Biden’s actions. That is not good enough for you, because you believe that such matters are always handled in the press, rather than behind the scenes. I disagree. Such is life.
Posted on 9/22/19 at 12:03 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I am a bit surprised,
No you aren't. That's why you didn't find a prior link either.
quote:
but I do not care enough to argue or to spend time looking for contradicting articles.
The "oh, now I don't care" approach. That's a message board first(said no one ever)
quote:
On page one, I quoted the former US ambassador to Ukraine, indicating that the US wanted him gone for policy reasons long before Biden’s actions. That is not good enough for you, because you believe that such matters are always handled in the press, rather than behind the scenes. I disagree. Such is life.
Oh for frick's sake. Your entire argument is made up in your fricking head at this point. YOU ran around this thread saying the ENTIRE WEST wanted the dude fired and now, EVERYONE in here knows you were talking out your arse and just repeating Dem talking points which...…...you know...…….is odd for someone who says he's not partisan.
quote:Ex Post Facto arguments aren't EVER good.
That is not good enough for you,
But, you knew this.
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News