re: poliboard existentialism

quote:

---

You call me evil

---

No, I call you a liar. For lying.

You cannot cut & paste any one of my posts EVER calling you evil.

Ffs what a screeching shrew.

You value men?

Seriously though, is what you are doing working?

It sounds as though you simply produced a smarter criminal.

quote:

---

Slaves were viewed as hands without a head.

You view women as holes without a head. You are sick and you have the audacity to condemn me for knowing women have worth beyond our genitals.

---

Women have inherent value that is equal to men, as both men and women are made in the image of God, and God sets the value of His creation.

If you want to claim women have worth (they do), you need to make sure you ground it in something transcendent, otherwise you fall into arbitrariness.

quote:

---

women have worth beyond our genitals.

---

debatable

quote:

---

Ffs what a screeching shrew.

---

I’d pity the husband, but he made his choice.

quote:

---

And yet we seem to be the blame

---

Yet, I'll wager, our taxes, or at least the donations of very charitable people, pay for her program, which includes her and her coworkers salaries and support infrastructure.

Continually throwing money away trying to reverse inate criminal behavior is an example of a systemic failure to protect law abiding citizens.

quote:

---

If you want to claim women have worth (they do), you need to make sure you ground it in something transcendent, otherwise you fall into arbitrariness.

---

Is innate human dignity not transcendent? Do you believe a human needs to meet certain subjective criteria to possess value?

quote:

---

Do you believe a human needs to meet certain subjective criteria to possess value

---

Really? I mean what worth is a person that contributed nothing to society versus one that has a job, takes care of the kids he or she produces, and pays taxes in a country dependent on those tax dollars? I don't care about your fancy words you use you are just ignorant to the fact any person with COMMON SENSE knows the answer too. Your spill about systematic racism and all your excuses for these people you work with daily is exhausting.

quote:

---

Agreed there is no inherent worth in technical skills, nor in education, much less in something as meaningless as violin lessons.

---

What you are seeing there is cubbie's radical commitment to feminism bumping up against the reality of history. She has a mindless and rabid—as you can see in the end of this thread, even feral—reaction to pretty mild ideas, and it's because she believes the revisionist history of feminism.

Women have pretty much always had the opportunity to become educated, at least in proportion to the opportunity that all common people had, and sometimes even more.

Women's colleges, for example, were not inferior to men's and in many, if not most, cases, were superior. And higher education was actually emphasized for women over men for most of history, because the vast majority of men were working manual labor occupations that didn't require higher education, while women were rearing and teaching children, an occupation for which education was obviously useful.

The reason feminists lie about this is because they will say that because women were denied access to men's colleges, that means they were denied the opportunity to become educated. They weren't allowed into Harvard and Yale, for example, so that equals being oppressed and denied education.

The problem with cubbie's lies is that—like so many leftist/Marxist narratives—they flip the truth 180 degrees.

The truth is that SHE is the one who doesn't value women.

Feminism starts with the undermining of all feminine virtues and roles, and it always has, going back to the 1st wave. It teaches that there is no value in feminine roles and the only value is in masculine roles, and women are oppressed because they are denied the opportunity to fulfill masculine roles.

You can see it in her rants here on this thread. She's not even responding to anything that I've actually said at this point—she's gotten to the point that she's just raging from a general pool of ideology, and you can see what I'm talking about in that raging. Both her raging against me and her compulsion to attack Sally's Human.

Feminism mandates as a dogma that there is no value in women bearing children, rearing children, managing a household, or occupying nurturing and/or support roles. The only value is in leaving the household and working outside it, outsourcing the raising of the children, and occupying leadership roles.

So if women are denied the latter, they are oppressed and those who suggest otherwise are "sick."

Cubbies knows very well that I have posted many times here that I have no problem with women working outside the home. Just not while there are children at home who need a parent at home. Just not if it means outsourcing the children's rearing to paid strangers.

There are two times in a life cycle that it makes all kinds of sense for women to work outside the home...before they have children and after the children don't need her at home anymore. Which leaves plenty of time for work outside the home.

But someone has to work and someone has to rear children and manage the household. What happens these days is that both spouses work—mostly due to materialism—and the children are reared by others or not really at all and the household is similarly half-assed taken care of.

And women keep becoming more and more depressed and anxious.