- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pfizer Employees Were Given Special Batch of Vaccine, different from public
Posted on 8/5/23 at 4:22 am to loogaroo
Posted on 8/5/23 at 4:22 am to loogaroo
Have we seen one member of Congress have any cardiac 'issues'? Oh, there's been age related events, no question. Mitch's brain lock. Biden doing Biden things. Diane Feinstein deteriorating in front of everyone's eyes (as her daughter gets power of attorney). And Fetterman, who was a vegetable before anyways.
Then again, would the public be told, even if there was?
Then again, would the public be told, even if there was?
0
Posted on 8/5/23 at 4:26 am to HVAU
quote:
HVAU
As far as I can tell, you’ve done nothing but divert in this thread, and still not addressed the most obvious question as to why Pfizer would not give the same vaccine to their employees as they did for the general public. It’s a valid question.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 4:29 am to GhostOfFreedom
It was not tested, it was a placebo
Posted on 8/5/23 at 7:48 am to 2020_reVISION
quote:
The "Special Batch" is called a "Placebo". They all got the saline solution...and/or Ivermectin, Hydroxychloraquine, etc..
Some of us said this from the beginning.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 7:53 am to GhostOfFreedom
Remember when their CEO refused to take the vaccine bc he “wouldn’t want to take a dose away from someone who was higher risk” ?
I remember.
I remember.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 8:12 am to HVAU
Actually, on a serious note, there is a lot of speculation that the vaccine was actually created by top conservatives and when I say that I mean scientist obviously that wanted to push it knowing that people that need to the left and more towards science and medicine would happily take the vaccine.
And it looks like they're playing work because a lot of Democrats took the vaccine and just look at the numbers hundreds of thousands of them have died, but you'll never find that number anywhere and 90% of them are Democrats. So in reality, conservatives should easily win most elections moving forward because they're the ones having kids, they're the ones who didn't get vaccinated, they're the ones who didn't die, they're the ones who are homeschooled, so they're not close to other people spreading any disease or whatever from the vaccine. Look at the top people. The real top people not with the media tells you and you will see that most of them mean to the right and this was probably a political attack but you have to really look hard to find the truth.
And it looks like they're playing work because a lot of Democrats took the vaccine and just look at the numbers hundreds of thousands of them have died, but you'll never find that number anywhere and 90% of them are Democrats. So in reality, conservatives should easily win most elections moving forward because they're the ones having kids, they're the ones who didn't get vaccinated, they're the ones who didn't die, they're the ones who are homeschooled, so they're not close to other people spreading any disease or whatever from the vaccine. Look at the top people. The real top people not with the media tells you and you will see that most of them mean to the right and this was probably a political attack but you have to really look hard to find the truth.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 9:13 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
As far as I can tell, you’ve done nothing but divert in this thread, and still not addressed the most obvious question as to why Pfizer would not give the same vaccine to their employees as they did for the general public. It’s a valid question.
Which is a better use of my time.
The article answers your why question, but most people here would rather create conspiracy theories than actually consider that answer. Pfizer sold batches of vaccine to the Australian government, and used a different batch for their employees that was not part of the government batch. Logically this works as a CYA by Pfizer, so the public couldn’t accuse Pfizer of self dealing.
There’s no discussion of data comparing health outcomes of vaccinated Pfizer employees to the vaccinated Australian public. There is no discussion of the chemical makeup of vaccine, and if that varied between the two batches. There’s really no discussion of anything substantial, just vague implications to drum up conspiracy minded dummies.
This post was edited on 8/5/23 at 9:14 am
Posted on 8/5/23 at 9:21 am to ksayetiger
quote:
FYI, 1 in 35 that got boosted are having serious side effects.
Care to provide a link to back up that number that isn’t some random claim on Twitter, Instagram or the like?
Also, what is the definition of a serious side effect?
I am not a defender of the shots, but also hate both sides for making these random “statistical claims” with either no support or some twisted logic to get to it.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 9:22 am to Pettifogger
quote:
and worshipping a 77 year old billionaire
That was the biggest pusher of said for the shot.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 9:26 am to HVAU
quote:
That’s when I went back in time to my 18 year old self and warned myself about everything that would happen.
So you went back in time to warn yourself about the jab, but not about Auburn’s football coaching hires? Think of the real good you could have done.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 9:28 am to PsychTiger
quote:
So you went back in time to warn yourself about the jab, but not about Auburn’s football coaching hires? Think of the real good you could have done.
Oh hell. I knew I forgot something.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 10:52 am to 2020_reVISION
I said this for the get go
Posted on 8/5/23 at 11:01 am to HVAU
I hate it for the people that got suckered into taking this crap. Life expectancy for them will decrease dramatically as time goes on. Those like HVAU will see that they made a huge mistake soon enough.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 11:17 am to Warboo
quote:
Life expectancy for them will decrease dramatically as time goes on. Those like HVAU will see that they made a huge mistake soon enough.
Based on what evidence?
From what I’ve seen of vaccine development and medical technology advancement over the past year or two , those that are willing to consider new treatments will have access to a lot of life extending drugs.
This post was edited on 8/5/23 at 11:41 am
Posted on 8/5/23 at 2:43 pm to HVAU
quote:
I appreciate your reasonable vibe considering my frivolity here.
Love the way you soften asshat behavior to frivolity. Keep up the good work. Try to stay out of that 20% increase in cancer deaths for your age group that began a little while after the vaccine rollout as I don't think you would come back from that one (not that anyone would care or even notice).
Posted on 8/5/23 at 2:51 pm to LakeCharles
quote:
Try to stay out of that 20% increase in cancer deaths for your age group that began a little while after the vaccine rollout).
Found the Infowarrior. You should stop relying on Alex’s half arse attempts to come up with narratives from the headlines of articles he hasn’t read.
This post was edited on 8/5/23 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 8/5/23 at 3:13 pm to HVAU
This dumbass isn't concerned that he got a different shot than the Pfizer employees even though Pfizer was reluctant to give the shot he got to their own people.
Just because you are alive today doesn't mean your immune system isn't compromised. And just because you got the shot doesn't mean it was actually not a dud. How many of those shots were actually kept at the proper temperature??? Maybe the horrible medical incidents could have been even worse.
Just because you are alive today doesn't mean your immune system isn't compromised. And just because you got the shot doesn't mean it was actually not a dud. How many of those shots were actually kept at the proper temperature??? Maybe the horrible medical incidents could have been even worse.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 3:21 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Just because you are alive today doesn't mean your immune system isn't compromised. And just because you got the shot doesn't mean it was actually not a dud. How many of those shots were actually kept at the proper temperature??? Maybe the horrible medical incidents could have been even worse.
The article doesn’t claim that employee said he was reluctant to receive the vaccine. Did you read the article?
If my immune system were compromised I would expect to see some evidence of that in the time since my last booster, about a year ago. You know, more frequent illnesses.
The rest of your response is just a series of logic hoops that aren’t worth considering. I could pose just as many hypotheticals, and they would be just as valuable as yours. Not at all, that is.
This post was edited on 8/5/23 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 8/5/23 at 6:55 pm to HVAU
1 in 35 people in peer reviewed study showed mRNA shot caused myocarditis injury to their heart. Studies have shown that the shot can cause your immune system to be compromised when exposed in the future.
These health risk indicate severe negligence are criminal conduct. The fact that they gave their own employees something different certain alludes to them giving something to them that would be less likely to kill or maim them.
You should be pissed. Instead you defend those that have treated you like a dependable money machine for them.
These health risk indicate severe negligence are criminal conduct. The fact that they gave their own employees something different certain alludes to them giving something to them that would be less likely to kill or maim them.
You should be pissed. Instead you defend those that have treated you like a dependable money machine for them.
Posted on 8/5/23 at 9:09 pm to HVAU
quote:
Found the Infowarrior. You should stop relying on Alex’s half arse attempts to come up with narratives from the headlines of articles he hasn’t read.
Check this out (make sure you study the data a little).
The Ethical Skeptic.com
This post was edited on 8/5/23 at 9:10 pm
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News