- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pelosi will be called as a J6 witness by Trump. He will prove she orchestrated J6!!
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:00 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:00 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Not sure how any of that would be relevant to the charges, which have nothing to do with people entering the Capitol, etc.
I believe the special counsel opened this door through his press conference when he announced the indictments. He went beyond the facts of the indictments and attempted to tie Trump's actions to the J6 Capital events. Can't imply his indictment is about x and then not allow the defense to argue against x.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:02 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
You are dealing with never trumpers and libs. Just sit back and enjoy the show. They will all disappear like farts in the wind.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:04 pm to fwtex
quote:
He went beyond the facts of the indictments and attempted to tie Trump's actions to the J6 Capital events. Can't imply his indictment is about x and then not allow the defense to argue against x.
Nothing that was said at the press conference is relevant at trial.
The indictment is the indictment. Jack Smith's press conference announcing the indictment will not be a subject of the trial.
Besides, let's pretend that Pelosi is called. Who's going to refute her testimony? They are 100% not putting Trump on the stand.
This post was edited on 8/8/23 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:05 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
But he wasn't charged with causing a riot
Amazing isn’t it.
Objection your honor.
On what grounds?
None of the charges in this trial include incitement.
Sustained
This post was edited on 8/8/23 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:07 pm to Indefatigable
You guys have got to start living in reality. This judge isn't going to allow anything like that to happen. She's going to rule for the government on everything relating to what evidence comes in, or not. No one is going to (or can) remove the judge from the case, either. There is no "boom" moment coming, this is not the WWE.
Trump's best hope is that the Supreme Court somehow intervenes to stop the prosecution, but I doubt they will.
Trump's best hope is that the Supreme Court somehow intervenes to stop the prosecution, but I doubt they will.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:08 pm to Timeoday
quote:
Unconscionable! Even the current, extremely corrupt Judge will be recused. It is about to get real ugly for the Democrats!!
Lighten up Francis.
You know nothing will come of the swamps corruption.
That's not how Washington works.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:09 pm to Timeoday
quote:
Trump is calling Nancy Pelosi as a witness for the J6 trial. She will now have to answer why she refused to let President Donald Trump order the National Guard in, why her daughter was their filming, why the doors were opened by the Capital Police, etc. Unconscionable! Even the current, extremely corrupt Judge will be recused. It is about to get real ugly for the Democrats!! The Pelosi Invitational Invites You In
Simple defense for Pukelosi
1) no intent
2) plausible deniability
3) Swamp member in good standing
4) Trump tricked me
Take your pick
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:09 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:or some other CIA developed phrase designed to denigrate.
This belongs in a Q thread
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:14 pm to roadGator
quote:"Q" and "conspiracy theorist" didn't exist until they were created
Q is the CIA?
pay attention
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:16 pm to Indefatigable
The fourth count directly relates to Jan 6.
It's for obstructing or attempting to obstruct an official proceeding.
It's for obstructing or attempting to obstruct an official proceeding.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:20 pm to Timeoday
quote:
Unconscionable! Even the current, extremely corrupt Judge will be recused. It is about to get real ugly for the Democrats!!
They opened that door. Much will be revealed, such as all the ballots without matching signatures in Georgia. It will be a shite show.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:21 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:And you think that security being inadequate to stop the thousands of angry rioters that Trump gathered and directed to go to the Capitol will somehow absolve Trump?
The indictment specifically talks about Trump instigated people to disrupt the proceedings.
Kinda like blaming bank security for a bank robbery.
This post was edited on 8/8/23 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:22 pm to roadGator
copied it
Operation trust
Operation trust
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:24 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
And you think that security being inadequate to stop the thousands of angry rioters that Trump gathered and directed to go to the Capitol will somehow absolve Trump?
Holy hyperbole.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:24 pm to TigerIron
quote:
You guys have got to start living in reality.
They choose to believe Trump instead.
Life is about to come at them hard.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 12:25 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
It's going to get really interesting once emails of Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger are subpoenaed.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News