- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/21/26 at 11:42 am to Decatur
quote:
They’re in his opinion, jackass.
Link it. I bet they don’t say what you claim. Dishonest jackass.
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 11:43 am
Posted on 4/21/26 at 11:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Perhaps you did not understand what you were responding to. The issue is interference with order and discipline. Order and discipline is critical to successful military operation. In an environment where life and death depends on order and discipline in following orders, questioning the latter is generally unworkable. Not following a direct order will be subject to court-martial.
*a lawful military order
Fixed it for you.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 11:44 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Link it. I bet they don’t say what you claim.
You’re a perfectly capable jackass. You can look it up yourself.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 11:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Your focus is on the lawful order part, rather than the innuendo that unlawful orders are being issued, AND that a 19y/o grunt with a HS degree had better sort through the legal nuances of every order he receives, lest he find himself being prosecuted. That is NOT the law, but it IS the message forwarded by Senator arse-tronaut.
You can try to spin them in a partisan way and fall into his trap
I'll tell you point blank, if Asstronaut finds himself in front of a court-martial panel, he will be in real trouble.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 11:58 am to Decatur
quote:
You’re a perfectly capable jackass. You can look it up yourself.
Knew you couldn’t bring the receipts. Posted on 4/21/26 at 11:59 am to BBONDS25
I’m not going to subsidize your laziness.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:00 pm to Decatur
quote:Provided earlier.
Citation requested.
quote:Good. Recall the SOB. Subject the antiAmerican bastard to a court-martial, and then let SCOTUS rule on legality.
SCOTUS has never applied the speech restrictions for *active duty* military members to retired military members
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:00 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Perhaps you did not understand what you were responding to.
I did. That's why I had to correct it for you
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:00 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Your focus is on the lawful order part, rather than the innuendo
Yes, my focus is on the words, not the partisan interpretation.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:No.
Yes, my focus is on the words, not the partisan interpretation.
Your focus is on a single tree in a forest.
Again, this is what Asstronaut breeched:
quote:
The purposes of military law are to promote justice, to deter misconduct, to facilitate appropriate accountability, to assist in maintaining good order and discipline in the armed forces, to promote efficiency and effectiveness in the military establishment, and thereby to strengthen the national security of the United States.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:15 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The purposes of military law are to promote justice, to deter misconduct, to facilitate appropriate accountability, to assist in maintaining good order and discipline in the armed forces, to promote efficiency and effectiveness in the military establishment, and thereby to strengthen the national security of the United States.
Is an officer permitted to use an unlawful order to ensure good order and discipline?
I have gifs from A Few Good Men ready to fire up
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
You can’t handle the truth!
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:22 pm to AGGIES
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:No unlawful orders were issued. THAT IS THE POINT!
Is an officer permitted to use an unlawful order to ensure good order and discipline?
Since you brought up "A Few Good Men," address what was expected of those soldiers in general commission of their duties, and in following orders in the reality, on the ground, that Galloway used to address the question posed by Weinberg "Why do you love them so much?"
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Uh oh. You normally don't double down on a mistake in our exchanges.
That's why I had to correct it for you
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:43 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
No unlawful orders were issued.
You didn't answer the question
Is an officer permitted to use an unlawful order to ensure good order and discipline?
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:45 pm to Austrianpaynter137
quote:
Austrianpaynter137
At 4¢/post, someone is not getting their moneys worth
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:46 pm to NC_Tigah
This guy does 1-3 alters a week and last about 2 hours on average.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:That is because your hypothetical has zero relevance in this discussion. There were no illegal orders issued.
You didn't answer the question
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News