- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Patel says arrests are coming soon.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:16 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:16 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Maybe he will give you the cite he claims is in the ruling that states (by the Supreme Court) that the UCMJ, specifically regarding speech, doesnt apply to retired service members. Apparently me asking for this was in bad faith. Nobody can accuse you of arguing in bad faith.
If it’s not bad faith, you have no idea how to read.
1
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
Which has nothing to do with retards and a video
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:So, the goal was a political gain by affecting military order and discipline.
the real reason, which was to have the admin fall into the trap and act like retarded donkeys in response
Do you even hear yourself?
quote:Had they stated the law correctly, we'd not be having this discussion. The UCMJ PRESUMES legal orders. The AntiAmerican, politics-before-servicemen's-lives (as you've noted), POS's did not state that. In fact, they encouraged presumption of the opposite.
Stating the law correctly violates the UMCJ?
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:25 pm to Jbird
quote:Right.
Is an officer permitted to use an unlawful order to ensure good order and discipline?
---
No he can't.
You know that.
I know that.
SFP knows that.
Every member of the military knows that.
There were no illegal orders issued.
There was no legal question about that issued.
So, what was the purpose of the PSA?
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:26 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
I think this is what he cited to me: Mark Kelly v. Pete Hegseth
Yep. And in that ruling there isn’t a single citation to what he claims.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:26 pm to NC_Tigah
Again the cocksucjers were hoping some E-2s or 3s would question Drumpfs orders
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:27 pm to Decatur
quote:
If it’s not bad faith, you have no idea how to read.
what a compelling argument. You are so sadly dishonest. You should be ashamed. This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 4:29 pm
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:42 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Yep. And in that ruling there isn’t a single citation to what he claims.
From the opinion:
quote:
Secretary Hegseth relies on the well-established doctrine that military servicemembers enjoy less vigorous First Amendment protections given the fundamental obligation for obedience and discipline in the armed forces. Unfortunately for Secretary Hegseth, no court has ever extended those principles to retired servicemembers, much less a retired servicemember serving in Congress and exercising oversight responsibility over the military. This Court will not be the first to do so!
And you claimed to have read this you frickin liar. That’s on the first page.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:47 pm to Jbird
quote:100%
Again the cocksucjers were hoping some E-2s or 3s would question Drumpfs orders
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:47 pm to Decatur
quote:
And you claimed to have read this you frickin liar. That’s on the first page.
Yet not a single citation to a single scotus ruling as you claimed. This activist judge said that. Not the scotus you fricking liar.
You do know what a citation is don’t you? We all see that you lied and that’s why you couldn’t include a cite as you claimed was in the ruling. Loser.
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:50 pm to NC_Tigah
It's why SkowTapDancerPro wants to parse.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:53 pm to BBONDS25
Here’s what I told NC
Judge Leon said *no* court has ever extended those principles to retired servicememeber.
That means the same frickin thing you imbecile. I don’t know why I waste any time on you.
quote:
SCOTUS has never applied the speech restrictions for *active duty* military members to retired military members.
Judge Leon said *no* court has ever extended those principles to retired servicememeber.
That means the same frickin thing you imbecile. I don’t know why I waste any time on you.
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 4/21/26 at 5:44 pm to Decatur
quote:
That means the same frickin thing you imbecile.
I specifically asked you for a citation to the scotus saying that portions of the UCMJ didn’t apply to retired serve members and specifically referred to speech. And you said:
quote:
They’re in his opinion, jackass.
They don’t exist you fricking imbecile. You made a fool of yourself. No way you’re an attorney.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 5:47 pm to Geekboy
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
PATEL: “I've NEVER been intoxicated on the job, and that is why we filed a $250 million defamation lawsuit. And any one of YOU that wants to participate, bring it on. I'll see you in court!”
“I can say unequivocally that I never listen to the fake news mafia.”
“And as when they get louder, it just means I'm doing my job. This FBI director has been on the job twice as many days as every director before me. What that means is I've taken half as many days off as those before me.”
“I'm the first one in. I'm the last one out. I'm like an everyday American who loves his country, loves his sport of hockey, and champions my friends when they raise a gold medal and invite me in to celebrate.”
Posted on 4/21/26 at 5:58 pm to Geekboy
That cross eyed fig isn't gonna do anything.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:45 pm to Geekboy
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
They're gonna WALK EVERYBODY THROUGH IT, how SPLC was literally paying 'hate group' informants to do commit crimes/entrap people for prosecution.
Then they're gonna PEEL BACK THE NEXT LAYER and show you the ORGANIZED CRIME FRONT that was masquerading as an FBI for decades doing this EXACT SAME shite.
Paying informants in these 'criminal groups' to either commit crimes so the FBI could move in and 'investigate', entrapping a bunch of patsies.
It was A VERY LUCRATIVE BUSINESS MODEL.
And it's all gonna be exposed and prosecuted.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:48 pm to Jauquismos
quote:
That cross eyed fig isn't gonna do anything.
He got indictments. That means trial. Moron.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:56 pm to BBONDS25
He aint got shite beta
Page 9 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News