- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Patel: Person of Interest Released
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:34 pm to KosmoCramer
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:34 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
A man was just murdered in cold blood on camera and you're saying "he's not valuable enough to kill."
It was in response to this
quote:
Yeah I’m close to putting my tinfoil hat on about it being a professional job.
Stop trying to turn my words into what they specifically were not.
There aren't many logical reasons to think this was a "professional job"
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
did not say it.
I don't think it was some professional hit. Hence the steel manning
Don't suggest it then
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:36 pm to gaetti15
Don’t resist the savior. His savior complex is well ingrained but you don’t want to be the one to ruin it.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:37 pm to BHTiger
wasn't his 1st post about a person of interest?
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Stop trying to turn my words into what they specifically were not.
There aren't many logical reasons to think this was a "professional job"
No matter the context, that was an extremely callous thing to say about a man that was literally just murdered in cold blood absolutely regardless of how you try to rationalize it.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:38 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I don't pay much attention to Charlie, but wouldn't he be a top five impact guy in terms of getting Trump elected and influencing college age people? Who does more outside of government other than Scott Presler?
All of that is still in place. Like I said, there will be others. Kirk wasn't the first.
Not even the first to do big college tours. Milo, Ben Shapiro, etc. did all that in 2016.
Now compare that to this groundswell of support and the organic response (even by DEMs) to this assassination. This is a Yamamoto quote scenario.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:38 pm to KosmoCramer
He knows what he’s doing. He did it on purpose. And then pretends you’re misconstruing it.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Kirk wasn't something valuable enough to kill, in the larger picture. There will be a next man up, and this ignores the galvanization his death (or even an attempt, like with Trump) would cause.
Your understanding of the overall dynamic is lacking, if not quite myopic.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:40 pm to the808bass
quote:
He knows what he’s doing. He did it on purpose. And then pretends you’re misconstruing it.
No people are just being emotional.
This is the Smith-Mundt Act thread all over again.
So we can't have a discussion on the potential that this was a professional hit? Why it makes sense or doesn't make sense?
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Kirk wasn't something valuable enough to kill, in the larger picture. There will be a next man up, and this ignores the galvanization his death (or even an attempt, like with Trump) would cause.
Honestly, I think he had really separated from the pack and there is a high likelihood that the next man up is far less charismatic and not nearly as blessed with his gut sense of the movement/moment
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
Im concerned there won't be anyone as effective to fill the void left by his death. He really was uniquely good at talking to young adults. And he had a strong moral compass, which is lacking in many people these days.
There are names out there but who knows which ones are even sincere. Charlie seemed to be that.
There are names out there but who knows which ones are even sincere. Charlie seemed to be that.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So we can't have a discussion on the potential that this was a professional hit?
You certainly can. You’re not dumb enough to pretend that the way you phrased that wasn’t incendiary.
This post was edited on 9/10/25 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:42 pm to NoSaint
quote:
Honestly, I think he had really separated from the pack and there is a high likelihood that the next man up is far less charismatic and not nearly as blessed with his gut sense of the movement/moment
That's fine. Let's assume that I underestimated how they would evaluate his individual impact
Does it still outweigh the response that the assassination would cause?
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:42 pm to Deuces
quote:
Not a chance. With modern technology and Kash Patel being the head of the FBI, and a conservative Governor, they won’t rest until this guy is captured. Dan Bongino has to be on full tilt right now.
And the January 6 pipe bomber from the DNC Headquarters? Yeah ok
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:43 pm to Seldom Seen
You too yeah I bench 600
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No people are just being emotional.
Im not being emotional over this at you.
You suggest it could be a professional hit then on the other hand you say that it's not likely.
So why mention it?
Might as well mention Putin pulled the trigger himself, it's just as likely...but ain't nobody throwing that shite out to discuss.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Kirk wasn't something valuable enough to kill, in the larger picture.
Yeah, you’re clueless
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:44 pm to gaetti15
quote:
You suggest it could be a professional hit
No. I responded to someone doing this showing why that doesn't make sense.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 7:45 pm to Gutta
quote:
It took several days to catch Luigi after the UHC CEO killing.
I still feel like the original cctv pic they released isn’t Luigi the guy was too tall
Popular
Back to top



1






