Started By
Message

re: Parents of school shooters being arrested

Posted on 9/5/24 at 9:10 pm to
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
5180 posts
Posted on 9/5/24 at 9:10 pm to
The kid had made threats and authorities interviewed him lat year.

What sort of dad in his right mind buys that kid an AR for Christmas? It's like he wanted him to do it.
This post was edited on 9/5/24 at 9:10 pm
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 9/5/24 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

if the FBI knew he was making threats, why didn't they prevent the shooting?


They should have charged him.
Posted by Finklesteins Kid
ATL
Member since May 2021
661 posts
Posted on 9/5/24 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

I think ol' Dad is culpable in these murders.


Ol Dad is a little TOO ate up with guns...he even named his kid Colt.
Posted by ChampKind
NOLA
Member since May 2018
30 posts
Posted on 9/5/24 at 9:28 pm to
If a kid was investigated a year ago for plotting a school shooting but not charged due to whatever and then acquired weapons to follow through with such crimes where the weapon was provided by the parent. Yes, they deserve to be charged. I’d argue for more than just manslaughter.
This post was edited on 9/5/24 at 9:29 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178892 posts
Posted on 9/5/24 at 9:32 pm to
If the threat was credible then why did the fbi do nothing?
Posted by Dixie2023
Member since Mar 2023
5205 posts
Posted on 9/5/24 at 9:40 pm to
Yesterday I’d said I didn’t think it was right to arrest parents for something their kids did barring parent part being at fault. He seems to deserve this arrest after providing his son a firearm when they knew he had issues. I think I read others knew also, so they too should be arrested. Utter failure by parent and system.
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
10870 posts
Posted on 9/5/24 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

I just read the father of the school shooter in GA was arrested for involuntary manslaughter. The parents of the Michigan school shooter were both sentenced to 10-15 years in prison( LINK). It seems like this could be a slippery slope and selectively being used. You certainly don't see the parents of other kids that commit crimes with guns being charged and where do you draw the line? What's the PB's take on this?


I think if these people werent human garbage who raised a POS, more people would have gone home to their families the other day.

Yes, if these people kept guns and ammo in easy reach of their kid who was threatening to kill people, they should get involuntary manslaughter and years in prison
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
10870 posts
Posted on 9/5/24 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

This might have something to do with it: quote:Colt Gray was given the gun he used to shoot dead four people at his Georgia high school as a Christmas present from his father months after they were questioned by the FBI over alleged threats. I think ol' Dad is culpable in these murders.


If that is true dad should get the rope. What a low life POS
Posted by weptiger
Georgia
Member since Feb 2007
11793 posts
Posted on 9/5/24 at 9:53 pm to
If the allegations being floated in the news turn out factually accurate, it’s not a great leap to charge the shooters dad.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13430 posts
Posted on 9/5/24 at 11:28 pm to
quote:

If the threat was credible then why did the fbi do nothing?


If they couldn't prove the kid made the threats and he wasn't confessing, what else could they do?
Posted by TrueLefty
St. Louis County
Member since Oct 2017
18678 posts
Posted on 9/5/24 at 11:52 pm to
I am going to quote part of the article.

quote:

Colin Gray said he visited his son’s school often because the teenager was being picked on.

“I don’t want him to fight anybody but they just keep like pinching him and touching him and like words are one thing,” the dad said, according to a transcript of the interview, “but you start touching him and that’s a whole different deal.”

The father told an investigator Colt Gray didn’t have unfettered access to firearms in the house but was allowed to use them when supervised.

Colin Gray said his son shot his first deer that year, and that he had a photo on his phone of the teenager with the deer’s blood on his cheeks.

During the Grays’s 2022 eviction, six firearms were found in the home, including a black “AR-15….with scope,” according to documents released by the sheriff’s office. The weapons were released to the owner, the documents said.

Earlier this year, a Michigan judge sentenced the parents of a teenager who killed four classmates at his high school to 10 to 15 years in prison each, the first parents of a school shooter to be held directly responsible for their child’s attack.

Link to the article below.
LINK
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
13564 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 12:14 am to
It's a slippery slope that will inevitably be used disproportionately. How do you prove a parent knew what was in their kids mind? Who decides when it's warranted and how do they come to that decision in one case but not another? This particular one, with the past history, seems a little more cut and dry. I'm can't say I'm 100% on board because of the precedent it sets, yet doesn't really set, but in this particular instance I can't really form a good argument against charging the dad. It's not illogical or a big stretch.
If she wasn't killed, should the Sandy Hook mom have been charged? I say yes. Yet we see her as an innocent victim. Not true at all. Not based on this precedent. Slippery slope indeed.
Posted by Dex Morgan
Member since Nov 2022
3227 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 12:16 am to
You just enjoy seeing anyone arrested.
Posted by Dex Morgan
Member since Nov 2022
3227 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 12:19 am to
The pro police state type "conservatives" around here would say yes.
Posted by Dex Morgan
Member since Nov 2022
3227 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 12:20 am to
I don't believe a damn thing the FBI says.
Posted by Dex Morgan
Member since Nov 2022
3227 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 12:22 am to
Yeah a day in court with your girl Fani Willis.
Posted by Mizzoufan26
Vacaville CA
Member since Sep 2012
18965 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 1:08 am to
No issue with it at all.

He shouldn't have had the access to the weapons, that's being a responsible gun owner and parent.

If you compound that basic principle with the fact that the kid was clearly troubled based on some of the accounts coming out it's magnified. There is clear negligence here on the parents' part.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
109220 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 1:13 am to
A basic rule of parenting should be that you don’t give weapons to a mentally ill (e.g., trans) child.
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
13223 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 4:39 am to
quote:

During the Grays’s 2022 eviction

Couldn't afford the rent in 2022...buying my 14 year old an AR15 in 2023.

This is not sounding like a stable home life...not an excuse.

quote:

six firearms were found in the home, including a black “AR-15


To keep a roof over my kids head I would sell my firearms but times would have to be real tough for that.

I'm seriously doubting the parenting skills of his folks.
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
13232 posts
Posted on 9/6/24 at 6:15 am to
quote:

If a kids kills someone driving a car recklessly


If the kid has a history of street racing, DWI, and has a suspended license-yes!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram