- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Only 1 Republican voted against the bill to ensure 18-24-year-olds charged as adults in DC
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:37 pm to Seldom Seen
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:37 pm to Seldom Seen
So, Massie chooses to allow violent adult criminals to be treated as juveniles instead of treating violent juvenile criminals as adults.
Typical Massie. The bill isn't perfect, so he will vote to maintain the status quo, the one thing all rational people can agree needs to change. Thanks for being so principled and keeping crime high with both ghettos and illegals, Mr. Massie. You truly care about the safety and security of America in your quest to always fight against the administration we all voted for.
Typical Massie. The bill isn't perfect, so he will vote to maintain the status quo, the one thing all rational people can agree needs to change. Thanks for being so principled and keeping crime high with both ghettos and illegals, Mr. Massie. You truly care about the safety and security of America in your quest to always fight against the administration we all voted for.
0
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:37 pm to jbdawgs03
Good ole Massie! Trump broke him.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:42 pm to Seldom Seen
So in your view, the “Epstein files” (whatever the hell that is supposed to include) justifies voting against totally unrelated legislation to make the Nation’s capital safer?
Am I following your retarded logic?
If I’m missing something, by all means, please explain.
Am I following your retarded logic?
If I’m missing something, by all means, please explain.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:43 pm to Flats
quote:
Oh, I'm sure it was just a one-pager that does absolutely nothing besides keeping judges from treating a 22 year old as a juvenile. Congress is always presenting direct, succinct bills like that.
Massie was alone in his vote.
His own words seem to be objecting to the ability to try 14 year olds as an adult in extreme circumstances. It reasonable to assume that’s his complaint.
He’s gone. He won’t rebound from this self destruction we’ve witnessed. I never saw this coming. It’s one of the largest flameouts we’ve ever seen in politics.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:45 pm to moneyg
Edit: Massie’s wife actually died. Prayers to Massie for that.
This post was edited on 9/16/25 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:48 pm to SallysHuman
quote:it was a request from Trump as part of a comprehensive package to hopefully avoid having to use the NG again.
For what principled, libertarian bullshite reason did he vote against treating voting aged adults like, well, adults?
But of that sentence all that is relevant to your question is: "it was a request from Trump"
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:49 pm to jbdawgs03
quote:
Only 1 Republican voted against the bill to ensure 18-24-year-olds charged as adults in DC
Trying to figure how and why this wasn’t already a law. So before today, a 24 year old could be prosecuted as a minor? Surely there is more to it
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:04 pm to moneyg
quote:
in extreme circumstances.
I haven't read the bill, I have no idea what the qualifiers are for trying a 14 year old as an adult. I probably agree with the bill but I'm not going to base my opinion of it on an X post. I'd hope nobody would.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:05 pm to Flats
quote:
Oh, I'm sure it was just a one-pager that does absolutely nothing besides keeping judges from treating a 22 year old as a juvenile. Congress is always presenting direct, succinct bills like that.
According to grok:
H.R. 4922, the DC CRIMES Act of 2025, is a short bill consisting of 4 sections. The official PDF of the introduced version is 8 pages long.26c0ba Based on the bill's content (approximately 2,500 words) and standard congressional formatting, the version that passed the House is similarly around 8 pages long.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:07 pm to jbdawgs03
Amazing how the liberals never have one single person leave the plantation. We always have at least one dumbass weak Republican.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:08 pm to JackieTreehorn
Or the two bags from Maine and Alaska.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:12 pm to jbdawgs03
I've always been of the belief that if you murder someone at 15 you are a monster and will only get worse as you age. I would have pissed myself if someone even talked about murdering someone at that age.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:17 pm to Flats
quote:
I haven't read the bill, I have no idea what the qualifiers are for trying a 14 year old as an adult. I probably agree with the bill but I'm not going to base my opinion of it on an X post. I'd hope nobody would
What would it have to be for you to be more concerned with a 14 year old being tried as an adult vs. an 18-24 yo not being tried as an adult?
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:18 pm to jbdawgs03
Primary his arse
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:18 pm to jbdawgs03
Primary him!
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:18 pm to jbdawgs03
This guy is the political embodiment of a few prominent posters here. They get some attention and just want to be a contrarian.
frick Thomas Massie.
frick Thomas Massie.
This post was edited on 9/16/25 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:19 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
Why would someone between 18-24 be tried as a juvenile?
Probably eliminating "youthful offender"
And let's be completely honest here, those "youthful offenders" have a dozen prior arrests at that point.
This post was edited on 9/16/25 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:21 pm to jbdawgs03
The ubiquitous turd in a punch bowl.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:23 pm to jbdawgs03
18 is still a juvenile? Since when?
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:24 pm to moneyg
quote:
What would it have to be for you to be more concerned with a 14 year old being tried as an adult vs. an 18-24 yo not being tried as an adult?
If it made it really easy instead of making it an option under extreme circumstances. 14 year olds typically shouldn't be tried as adults. I think that's just as obvious as saying a 22 year old typically shouldn't be tried as a juvenile.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News