Started By
Message

re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread

Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:06 am to
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
1159 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:06 am to
I’m sure they have targeted the Lincoln. Targeting and hitting are two different things.
Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
5875 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:07 am to
quote:

interim Supreme Leader


That’s a great title.
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
29729 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:08 am to
The MQ9 is one of it not our most sophisticated stealth drone that we actually know of, even though the pentagon still officially hasn’t confirmed they’re even in use when the first one was built 15 years ago


It’s what my wife’s brother flies. I’m sure there’s more advanced shite most of that just ain’t for us to know currently. Iran 100% doesn’t have the capacity for taking one of them down
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
1159 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:12 am to
quote:

The MQ9 is one of it not our most sophisticated stealth drone that we actually know of, even though the pentagon still officially hasn’t confirmed they’re even in use when the first one was built 15 years ago


All of this is wrong. Theres absolutely nothing stealthy about an MQ-9. It’s slow and has almost zero maneuverability and we’ve been using them for like 20 years very openly.

If anything is gonna be shot down by the Iranians it’s an MQ-9.
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 8:13 am
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
21429 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Not our fight.


Once we started blowing shite up, it became our fight. You simply don’t dip the frick out without the country being secure. That’s a recipe for disaster. You’re inviting all of the surrounding countries to get their pound of flesh.
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
10725 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:15 am to
That looks fake to me.


Seems like the Iranian propaganda machine is picking up
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
29729 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:16 am to
It’s an ISR drone designed for cyber warfare while also carrying 15x the payload as its predecessor the predator.

It isn’t stealth in the same way B2 bombers are, it’s stealth because of its jamming capacity.

It’s literally called a “hunter killer” as it can sit and track and hover over targets from 24-36 hours without refueling depending on how much weight it is carrying in weapons

It’s specifically designed for high altitude long endurance surveillance with the ability to deliver massive payloads depending on how much it has outfitted on each flight. And no, we do not use them “very openly”
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 8:19 am
Posted by TheOtherWhiteMeat
Fort Smith
Member since Nov 2009
20651 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:18 am to
quote:

Theres absolutely nothing stealthy about an MQ-9.


Not entirely true, it has a low radar cross section, a characteristic of stealth technology. So while it isn't a stealth aircraft, I wouldn't say it has NOTHING stealth about it.
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
1159 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:18 am to
quote:

It’s an ISR drone designed for cyber warfare while also carrying 15x the payload as its predecessor the predator. It isn’t stealth in the same way B2 bombers are, it’s stealth because of its jamming capacity. It’s literally called a “hunter killer” as it can sit and track and hover over targets from 24-36 hours without refueling depending on how much weight it is carrying in weapons


I know exactly what it is. It was designed to do ISR and to strike targets. The jamming and cyber are just packages that can be installed.

Either way, it’s absolutely plausible that one was shot down.
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
1159 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:19 am to
quote:

Not entirely true, it has a low radar cross section, a characteristic of stealth technology. So while it isn't a stealth aircraft, I wouldn't say it has NOTHING stealth about it.


I mean, it’s small. That’s pretty much the extent of its stealthiness.
Posted by Crawdaddy
Slidell. The jewel of Louisiana
Member since Sep 2006
19241 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:22 am to
CNN and a pushing (hoping) Mark Warner on an answer that Iran can hit us mainland with missles. She seems disappointed in his no answer. Bit keep asking i
Posted by TigersSEC2010
Warren, Michigan
Member since Jan 2010
38435 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:27 am to
Looks like they hit a French naval base in UAE. France going to join or continue to be cucks?
Posted by TheOtherWhiteMeat
Fort Smith
Member since Nov 2009
20651 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:29 am to
quote:

continue to be cucks


They'll have a strongly worded warning ready today at some point.

"Do Not Strike Us! We have already surrendered!"
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 8:30 am
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
15566 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:29 am to
quote:


If we think we know where the uranium is, do we send in Special ops to get it?


If you think that this is about uranium, you have missed the boat.
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
17080 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:35 am to
quote:

If these high level meeting(s) had anything to do with making a decision about the nuclear talks that’s pretty cold-blooded. Not that I’m against that sort of thing.


They were never going to agree to give up their nuclear weapon program.

That meeting was probably to discuss a preemptive attack on US forces when (they believed) we were not setup and ready. This possibility has been mentioned here before.

I don’t think they realized when our forces showed up that we would be ready to fight on day one. It is like someone (maybe in the other thread) asked how long would it take for the Ford to be ready to fight once it arrived at the eastern Mediterranean.

The Iranians thought they would catch us off guard but they were the ones with their pants around their ankles.
Posted by RaginCajunz
Member since Mar 2009
7183 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Looks like they hit a French naval base in UAE. France going to join or continue to be cucks?


No money. No real military. Overrun with Muslims. They’re not doing shite.
Posted by Shaun176
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
3092 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:38 am to
quote:

France going to join or continue to be cucks?


They will blame US.
Posted by Beau Fontenot
Upper Delta
Member since Oct 2018
779 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:39 am to
What's our goal here? If it's to destroy their capability to produce viable nuclear weapons, at least for a long time, that seems achievable. We've obviously killed their leader, but the secondary goal of removing the entire regime is more problematic. They have layers of leadership designed for this sort of scenario. I think it would require boots on the ground for a long time. Civil war is likely. Israel would have to take the lead in any such effort. I don't think the American public wants large numbers of American personnel involved in another Middle Eastern conflict, especially if we've eliminated the nuclear threat.
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
1159 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:39 am to
quote:

No real military


The French have the best military in Europe. It’s not even particularly close.
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
1159 posts
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:40 am to
quote:

What's our goal here?


Regime change. Where have you been?
Jump to page
Page First 94 95 96 97 98 ... 834
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 96 of 834Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram