- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:07 am to cypher
quote:
interim Supreme Leader
That’s a great title.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:08 am to BOHICAMAN
The MQ9 is one of it not our most sophisticated stealth drone that we actually know of, even though the pentagon still officially hasn’t confirmed they’re even in use when the first one was built 15 years ago
It’s what my wife’s brother flies. I’m sure there’s more advanced shite most of that just ain’t for us to know currently. Iran 100% doesn’t have the capacity for taking one of them down
It’s what my wife’s brother flies. I’m sure there’s more advanced shite most of that just ain’t for us to know currently. Iran 100% doesn’t have the capacity for taking one of them down
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:12 am to td01241
quote:
The MQ9 is one of it not our most sophisticated stealth drone that we actually know of, even though the pentagon still officially hasn’t confirmed they’re even in use when the first one was built 15 years ago
All of this is wrong. Theres absolutely nothing stealthy about an MQ-9. It’s slow and has almost zero maneuverability and we’ve been using them for like 20 years very openly.
If anything is gonna be shot down by the Iranians it’s an MQ-9.
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 8:13 am
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:12 am to Lsut81
quote:
Not our fight.
Once we started blowing shite up, it became our fight. You simply don’t dip the frick out without the country being secure. That’s a recipe for disaster. You’re inviting all of the surrounding countries to get their pound of flesh.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:15 am to td01241
That looks fake to me.
Seems like the Iranian propaganda machine is picking up
Seems like the Iranian propaganda machine is picking up
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:16 am to BOHICAMAN
It’s an ISR drone designed for cyber warfare while also carrying 15x the payload as its predecessor the predator.
It isn’t stealth in the same way B2 bombers are, it’s stealth because of its jamming capacity.
It’s literally called a “hunter killer” as it can sit and track and hover over targets from 24-36 hours without refueling depending on how much weight it is carrying in weapons
It’s specifically designed for high altitude long endurance surveillance with the ability to deliver massive payloads depending on how much it has outfitted on each flight. And no, we do not use them “very openly”
It isn’t stealth in the same way B2 bombers are, it’s stealth because of its jamming capacity.
It’s literally called a “hunter killer” as it can sit and track and hover over targets from 24-36 hours without refueling depending on how much weight it is carrying in weapons
It’s specifically designed for high altitude long endurance surveillance with the ability to deliver massive payloads depending on how much it has outfitted on each flight. And no, we do not use them “very openly”
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 8:19 am
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:18 am to BOHICAMAN
quote:
Theres absolutely nothing stealthy about an MQ-9.
Not entirely true, it has a low radar cross section, a characteristic of stealth technology. So while it isn't a stealth aircraft, I wouldn't say it has NOTHING stealth about it.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:18 am to td01241
quote:
It’s an ISR drone designed for cyber warfare while also carrying 15x the payload as its predecessor the predator. It isn’t stealth in the same way B2 bombers are, it’s stealth because of its jamming capacity. It’s literally called a “hunter killer” as it can sit and track and hover over targets from 24-36 hours without refueling depending on how much weight it is carrying in weapons
I know exactly what it is. It was designed to do ISR and to strike targets. The jamming and cyber are just packages that can be installed.
Either way, it’s absolutely plausible that one was shot down.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:19 am to TheOtherWhiteMeat
quote:
Not entirely true, it has a low radar cross section, a characteristic of stealth technology. So while it isn't a stealth aircraft, I wouldn't say it has NOTHING stealth about it.
I mean, it’s small. That’s pretty much the extent of its stealthiness.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:22 am to BOHICAMAN
CNN and a pushing (hoping) Mark Warner on an answer that Iran can hit us mainland with missles. She seems disappointed in his no answer. Bit keep asking i
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:27 am to Crawdaddy
Looks like they hit a French naval base in UAE. France going to join or continue to be cucks?
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:29 am to TigersSEC2010
quote:
continue to be cucks
They'll have a strongly worded warning ready today at some point.
"Do Not Strike Us! We have already surrendered!"
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 8:30 am
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:29 am to ItTakesAThief
quote:
If we think we know where the uranium is, do we send in Special ops to get it?
If you think that this is about uranium, you have missed the boat.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:35 am to WestSideTiger
quote:
If these high level meeting(s) had anything to do with making a decision about the nuclear talks that’s pretty cold-blooded. Not that I’m against that sort of thing.
They were never going to agree to give up their nuclear weapon program.
That meeting was probably to discuss a preemptive attack on US forces when (they believed) we were not setup and ready. This possibility has been mentioned here before.
I don’t think they realized when our forces showed up that we would be ready to fight on day one. It is like someone (maybe in the other thread) asked how long would it take for the Ford to be ready to fight once it arrived at the eastern Mediterranean.
The Iranians thought they would catch us off guard but they were the ones with their pants around their ankles.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:37 am to TigersSEC2010
quote:
Looks like they hit a French naval base in UAE. France going to join or continue to be cucks?
No money. No real military. Overrun with Muslims. They’re not doing shite.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:38 am to TigersSEC2010
quote:
France going to join or continue to be cucks?
They will blame US.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:39 am to Bronco11
What's our goal here? If it's to destroy their capability to produce viable nuclear weapons, at least for a long time, that seems achievable. We've obviously killed their leader, but the secondary goal of removing the entire regime is more problematic. They have layers of leadership designed for this sort of scenario. I think it would require boots on the ground for a long time. Civil war is likely. Israel would have to take the lead in any such effort. I don't think the American public wants large numbers of American personnel involved in another Middle Eastern conflict, especially if we've eliminated the nuclear threat.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:39 am to RaginCajunz
quote:
No real military
The French have the best military in Europe. It’s not even particularly close.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:40 am to Beau Fontenot
quote:
What's our goal here?
Regime change. Where have you been?
Back to top


0





