- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted on 5/3/26 at 7:29 am to Bronco11
Posted on 5/3/26 at 7:29 am to Bronco11
At least 16 American military sites have been damaged in Iranian strikes, making up the majority of US positions in the Middle East.
The damage includes high-value targets using Chinese satellite imagery.
The “official” number is about $25B so far. A more realistic current based upon Congressional estimates is in the range of $25B–$50B
One of many videos recently out there...
The damage includes high-value targets using Chinese satellite imagery.
The “official” number is about $25B so far. A more realistic current based upon Congressional estimates is in the range of $25B–$50B
One of many videos recently out there...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
4
Posted on 5/3/26 at 7:44 am to Nole Man
This place is looking like facebooks 
Posted on 5/3/26 at 7:51 am to Nole Man
quote:
$25B–$50B
Oh jeeze, you going to believe that?
To place that into scale, if they have caused that much damage, then the US at this point has topped $1trillion in damages to Iran.
Sometimes numbers are just that dumb
Posted on 5/3/26 at 7:54 am to Nole Man
quote:
The “official” number is about $25B so far. A more realistic current based upon Congressional estimates is in the range of $25B–$50B
Any realistic cost that is not just damn statistics, has to account for what is the actual additional cost of the war not inclusive of the normal cost of the military. Those ships and aircraft cost a lot every day even when not at war.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 7:59 am to Nole Man
I couldn't quite tell whose version of Iranian propaganda that was, but it was long on hyperbole and short on facts. The damage "estimates" were unverified and what we had was a couple of jets, a couple of radar installations, and some trailers, tents and quonset huts that were damaged. If that's $50 billion, then the US and Israel must've done about $50 trillion in damage to Iran. Do those massively one-sided damages that the Iranian regime has suffered make the US look vulnerable, IYO? Does that have US allies in the region running scared.
But, for the sake of argument let's assume this propaganda piece is completely accurate. Let's take their assertion at face value; Iran, with help from China and Russia, has built up a strong enough military with enough militia, precision ballistic missiles, drones , etc., to not only inflict grievous damage on the entire middle east, but grievous and long lasting harm to the world's greatest military. Does this mean we should've left Iran alone, let them continue to build their military strength, fund and strengthen their militia across the region, develop longer range weapons armed with nukes? Should we have just watched as Iran/China/Russia eventually reached a position of unassailable control over the Middle East?
What about the video's claim that damage to US bases is making Gulf countries wary of their US alliance? Why would anything that's happened to date make the other Gulf states less likely to likely to want an alliance with the US? Are they more trusting of the countries who have been helping Iran build their weapons and militia, like China and Russia, or who are refusing to stand up to the regime like the UK and Europe? It seems a little counterintuitive to me. Maybe you're making the case that this war was absolutely necessary and, if anything, we almost waited to long? If that's what you're trying to say (albeit with exaggerated unproven assertions), I agree.
But, for the sake of argument let's assume this propaganda piece is completely accurate. Let's take their assertion at face value; Iran, with help from China and Russia, has built up a strong enough military with enough militia, precision ballistic missiles, drones , etc., to not only inflict grievous damage on the entire middle east, but grievous and long lasting harm to the world's greatest military. Does this mean we should've left Iran alone, let them continue to build their military strength, fund and strengthen their militia across the region, develop longer range weapons armed with nukes? Should we have just watched as Iran/China/Russia eventually reached a position of unassailable control over the Middle East?
What about the video's claim that damage to US bases is making Gulf countries wary of their US alliance? Why would anything that's happened to date make the other Gulf states less likely to likely to want an alliance with the US? Are they more trusting of the countries who have been helping Iran build their weapons and militia, like China and Russia, or who are refusing to stand up to the regime like the UK and Europe? It seems a little counterintuitive to me. Maybe you're making the case that this war was absolutely necessary and, if anything, we almost waited to long? If that's what you're trying to say (albeit with exaggerated unproven assertions), I agree.
This post was edited on 5/3/26 at 10:37 am
Posted on 5/3/26 at 8:11 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
CNN ran that video.
Of course they did.
They may as well be the propaganda arm of the IRCG at this point.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 8:31 am to MKP2004
Speaking of waiting out blockades
Posted on 5/3/26 at 8:35 am to wdhalgren
I cannot tell what version of Israeli propaganda that was, but it was long on hypotheticals and short on critical thinking.
We should treat Iran and any other country in that region the same. There are many other countries that have nuclear weapons, are unfriendly to the USA, and are enlarging their military. Do we attack them? …No.
Why did we attack Iran? Because Netanyahu and his Jewish billionaire friends pressured Trump into it.
We should treat Iran and any other country in that region the same. There are many other countries that have nuclear weapons, are unfriendly to the USA, and are enlarging their military. Do we attack them? …No.
Why did we attack Iran? Because Netanyahu and his Jewish billionaire friends pressured Trump into it.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 8:39 am to Nole Man
The source is a far leftist whacko from Los Angeles.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 8:42 am to MKP2004
Some body explain why, if the CNN damage report shows horrendous, extreme valued damage to facilities, The number of dead US military is only 12, with half of that caused by US pilot error running into each other.
For that amount of damage with minuscule fatalities one can only conclude that Iran was totally being benevolent sending drones after the day shift goes home or distributing air dropped leaflets asking people evacuate before strikes . Like what the Israelis do.
For that amount of damage with minuscule fatalities one can only conclude that Iran was totally being benevolent sending drones after the day shift goes home or distributing air dropped leaflets asking people evacuate before strikes . Like what the Israelis do.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 8:49 am to wfallstiger
Posted on 5/3/26 at 8:50 am to hawgfaninc
Posted on 5/3/26 at 8:55 am to hawgfaninc
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Clash Report presents itself as a neutral conflict news aggregator, but it is the English-language division of a Turkish media company with deep ties to the Erdogan family and Turkish state agencies. The company behind it, Monolog Medya, was a contractor for two branches of the Erdogan political family — his personal charitable foundation and the flagship festival of his son-in-law Selçuk Bayraktar, Turkey’s drone billionaire. Monolog Medya’s director is a veteran of TRT, Turkey’s state broadcaster.
Clash Report’s editors are TRT alumni, its only advertiser is a Turkish state defense contractor, and its podcast host promotes Muslim Brotherhood leaders. When Western politicians and journalists share Clash Report, they are amplifying an Erdogan-adjacent influence operation dressed up as breaking news. To be more specific:
Clash Report is the name of a prominent English-language news aggregator X account. The account frequently goes viral, with its content shared by U.S. senators, congressmen, prominent influencers, podcasters, and tech figures. Interspersed among its news posts, however, are numerous instances of conspiratorial, antisemitic, and anti-American content.
A Turkish company called Monolog Medya Bilisim Egitim Reklam ve Organizasyon Ltd. Sti. runs a Turkish-language news platform called GDH (”Gündeme Dair Haberler” — “News About the Agenda”). Clash Report is GDH’s English-language division. The three are the same operation: one company, one editorial team, two brands in two languages.
Monolog Medya’s director and owner, Cüneyt Polat, is a former Digital Media Director at Turkey’s state broadcaster TRT. His company lists a client called TÜRGEV — the personal charitable foundation of the Erdogan family, marking one of two separate Erdogan family connections — the second, the Bayraktar contracting relationship, is described below.
Monolog Medya operated backend servers for Teknofest — Turkey’s state-backed technology festival run by Selçuk Bayraktar’s T3 Foundation. Selçuk Bayraktar is Erdogan’s son-in-law and owner of Baykar, Turkey’s flagship drone manufacturer.
Clash Report’s Chief Editor is Kamer Kurunç. Among its staff is Mehmet A. Kanci, a TRT Haber Special Reports Coordinator and writer for Anadolu Ajansi (another state-run outlet).
The Clash Report X account sat dormant for five years, then activated on February 28, 2020 — the night Turkey launched Operation Spring Shield in Syria. By the next day it had 49,200 followers.
Why Clash Report Matters
Spend any time on X following politics and military conflicts, and you’ve undoubtedly encountered Clash Report. Drone footage, conflict maps, breaking strike updates, political developments in America and Europe, all in English, all timestamped within minutes of events. Major Western reporters quote it. Wire services reference it. Politicans retweet it. Even national governments engage with it. The brand presents itself, in its own words, as your source for unbiased, data-driven news and analysis on global conflicts.
Anyone familiar with influence operations will recognize Clash Report for what it really is. After some old-fashioned sleuthing, I’ve identified the company behind it, the people running it, and their ties to the Turkish state media apparatus — including one operator who pushes a Muslim Brotherhood agenda — even as the brand takes deliberate steps to obscure its Turkish origins.
The Company Behind Clash Report
Let’s start with the most important find — the one that closes the loop on who actually owns this operation.
Apple’s App Store maintains a public database of every app developer. When you look up Clash Report’s iOS app by its App Store ID (6748907974), Apple’s own system returns a single legal developer name: MONOLOG MEDYA BILISIM EGITIM REKLAM VE ORGANIZASYON LIMITED SIRKETI — Monolog Media Informatics Education Advertising and Organization Ltd. This is not inferred or guessed. It is a machine-returned field from Apple’s own database.
The same developer record lists not one app, not two, but three: Clash Report, Clash Report Map, and GDH: Haberin Dijital Medyasi (”GDH: The Digital Media of the News”). Apple’s metadata also includes a “seller URL” field for the developer account, and that field does not point to clashreport.com. It points to a different website entirely: gdh.digital.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 8:57 am to FlyDownTheField83
quote:
I cannot tell what version of Israeli propaganda that was, but it was long on hypotheticals and short on critical thinking.
Ah yes, the old Israel controls Trump hypothesis. A few years ago it was Russia controls Trump, Trump is Putin's puppet. Is Putin in on this too, or did "Bibi" outbid him for control of Trump? Maybe it's the Bilderbergers controlling the whole world? Or maybe the US has a national interest in not allowing militant Chinese puppet states to control the flow of oil in the Persian Gulf.
quote:
We should treat Iran and any other country in that region the same.
Any Chinese aligned, autocratic regime with nuclear aspirations in that region probably will get equal treatment. Especially if they or their militia threaten shipping in the gulf and the Red Sea, or if they start making advances in to the Americas.
quote:
There are many other countries that have nuclear weapons, are unfriendly to the USA, and are enlarging their military.
Not in the middle east, threatening to close the Persian Gulf, not with a long history of funding foreign militia in that region and branching out to South America. There's nobody even close to that.
quote:
Why did we attack Iran? Because Netanyahu and his Jewish billionaire friends pressured Trump into it.
You're having trouble distinguishing facts from conspiracy theories. The ramblings of podcasters are not facts.
This post was edited on 5/3/26 at 9:07 am
Posted on 5/3/26 at 8:57 am to hawgfaninc
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Reuters: Iran’s proposal clashes with U.S. demands, as Tehran wants to delay nuclear talks while Washington insists Iran first give up its 400 kg+ of highly enriched uranium to end the war. Iran instead prioritizes reopening the Strait of Hormuz and addressing broader issues before nuclear negotiations.
The 14 point proposal includes lifting the blockade and sanctions, removing U.S. forces from the region, releasing frozen assets, compensation payments, ending fighting across all fronts including Lebanon, and creating a new mechanism for the strait. Iran frames delaying nuclear talks as a way to ease negotiations, while the U.S. faces pressure as the strait disruption impacts about 20% of global oil and gas flows and drives up prices.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 9:09 am to BayouBengal51
Iran really has no clue as to their situation. Their wish list is just a fantasy.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 9:58 am to TurkeyBaconLeg
quote:
Their wish list is just a fantasy.
I think that maybe they are trying to follow Trumps playbook. Ask for the sky then settle down to what you really can get or in their case, ask and hope they will get anything.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 10:51 am to wdhalgren
You are ignoring facts that do not suit your narrative, I hope you wake up one day.
Were you wearing your smoking jacket puffing on your pipe as you proclaim, “…the old Israel controls Trump hypothesis..”? How many times did Netanyahu visit the White House to harangue Trump about attacking Iran before declaring he would attack Iran alone (lies)? What were the reported responses of Vance and Rubio when Trump said he wanted to attack Iran?
Wow! He and Netanyahu have done a GREAT job of that! I mean look how much better oil tankers pass through the Strait of Hormuz now versus two months ago. We just handed a weapon to Iran that they will now use against the world for decades.
Any objective reading of the information from multiple, sources will show we have accomplished less than we have gained. However, Israel and Netanyahu got what they wanted so all the Israel first fans should be happy.
Were you wearing your smoking jacket puffing on your pipe as you proclaim, “…the old Israel controls Trump hypothesis..”? How many times did Netanyahu visit the White House to harangue Trump about attacking Iran before declaring he would attack Iran alone (lies)? What were the reported responses of Vance and Rubio when Trump said he wanted to attack Iran?
quote:
…not allowing militant Chinese puppet states to control the flow of oil…
Wow! He and Netanyahu have done a GREAT job of that! I mean look how much better oil tankers pass through the Strait of Hormuz now versus two months ago. We just handed a weapon to Iran that they will now use against the world for decades.
Any objective reading of the information from multiple, sources will show we have accomplished less than we have gained. However, Israel and Netanyahu got what they wanted so all the Israel first fans should be happy.
Posted on 5/3/26 at 10:55 am to Tigerswillprevail
Trumps playbook works because he holds the cards. Iran has no cards left. Trump took their Hormuz card and put it in his deck with the Blockade.
Page 830 of 835
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News