- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official RT Indictment Thread -- Youtubers Lauren Chen, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool Linked
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:38 am to Perfect Circle
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:38 am to Perfect Circle
The government's argument is probably that you can do that, but you just need to register under FARA. The Scott Ritter case will be an interesting test.
1
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:38 am to jclem11
quote:
Nice whataboutism, chief. Not what this thread is about. Go melt in the Hunter tax fraud thread.
Actually this thread is whataboutism from you. The Hunter stuff is almost a decade old.
Now do you think a sitting vice President selling influence is more serious than some dude talking about high prices on YouTube?
I’m also reminding you that in the link you provided in another thread stated tim would have made these videos anyway. So Russians paid for content that was already being put out.
Unless your argument is that people wanting secure borders and lower gas prices is a Russian psyop and no one actually wants those things.
This post was edited on 9/6/24 at 7:48 am
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:39 am to jclem11
Would you feel this way if The Young Turks were vulgarly dissing Trump.
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:39 am to GumboPot
quote:
TimCast that has nothing to do with Tenet Media.
Bro Tim licensed his content to be hosted on Tenet Media and was on their frickin website.
quote:
Commentator-2's contract, which was between Commentator-2's
production company and U.S. Company-I, provided for weekly videos to be hosted by Commentator-2 and livestreamed by U.S. Company-I. In exchange for a fee of $100,000 per video, Commentator-2's production company granted U.S. Company-I "a non-exclusive, non transferable ... license, during the applicable License Term, to display, transmit, and distribute the Licensed Content."
The entire indictment is a lie and totally made up? Is that your take?
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:39 am to jclem11
quote:
jclem11
Hahahaha you know exactly what you’re doing bitch. Trying to spin a non story in regards to everyone you listed minus some girl no one has heard of and it will blow up in your face just like every other Russia, Russia, Russia angle you groomers try and push. You still believe Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation like a good little sheep.
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:40 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
The government's argument is probably that you can do that, but you just need to register under FARA. The Scott Ritter case will be an interesting test.
Before Trump FARA violations were rarely if ever pursued by the DOJ.
Now they are all the rage.
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:40 am to themunch
quote:
Would you feel this way if The Young Turks were vulgarly dissing Trump.
I would have the same take.
I don't watch TYT nor care about them. Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:40 am to jclem11
quote:
“While the views expressed in the videos are not uniform, most are directed to the publicly stated goals of the Government of Russia and RT — to amplify domestic divisions in the United States.”
Just checking my translation here...
The content of the podcast had views that "amplified domestic divisions in the United States"
... and the USA being divided, is a goal and benefit to Russia
... so anything that encourages division -- such as debate, discourse, or general disagreement -- is considered a Russian influence campaign?
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:41 am to jclem11
quote:
Question: Are you okay with influencers taking money from foreign countries with the explicit goal of influencing our elections and policy?
You think all that democrat money going going to the MSM to do the very same thing is squeaky clean?
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:41 am to jclem11
Did Tim say he was Commentator 2?
Could be Dave Rubin or any of the other media personalities.
Could be Dave Rubin or any of the other media personalities.
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:42 am to GumboPot
That's my problem with it. A guy like Manafort is surely no angel, but there are probably 5,000 Manaforts in D.C., most of whom nothing happens to -- enforcement on these things is totally selective.
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:42 am to GumboPot
quote:
Before Trump FARA violations were rarely if ever pursued by the DOJ.
Now they are all the rage.
Only if you're MAGA or conservative.
Podesta and Hunter Biden blatantly violated FARA and nothing.
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:43 am to GumboPot
quote:
GumboPot
Put the broom down, janny.
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:43 am to lowhound
I bet you any money the FBI could link Soros to any number of media ops, but they won't because they are enforcement for the DNC.
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:43 am to GumboPot
Will be fun to bump this once a month when nothing comes of it and OP realizes she’s been manipulated yet again
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:43 am to jmcwhrter
What's funny is during the DOJ press conference they mentioned nefarious Iranian influence on the Trump campaign. I guess they felt like they had to be fair and balanced.
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:44 am to jmcwhrter
quote:
Just checking my translation here...
The content of the podcast had views that "amplified domestic divisions in the United States"
... and the USA being divided, is a goal and benefit to Russia
... so anything that encourages division -- such as debate, discourse, or general disagreement -- is considered a Russian influence campaign?
I like where you're going with this
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:44 am to jclem11
quote:
know the money from Tenet was dirty?
What is dirty money?
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:44 am to jclem11
quote:
Question: Are you okay with influencers taking money from foreign countries with the explicit goal of influencing our elections and policy?
The sad fact is that we have been lied to before about this. By those making the accusations. I don’t follow any of these people, but know enough that they probably called out these lies. That makes it an inherently gray situation that, unfortunately can’t stop a conversation once your question is answered.
quote:
the DOJ said. “While the views expressed in the videos are not uniform, most are directed to the publicly stated goals of the Government of Russia and RT — to amplify domestic divisions in the United States.”
Indict yourself then DOJ. There is a reason their actions against Trump have been labeled as unprecedented, because it would cause division. They have made the dammed for division products incredibly high
Posted on 9/6/24 at 7:44 am to jmcwhrter
You are close...
Any speech the OP or his ilk disagree with is "hate" and "Russian Disinformation". Forget all the lies that are told daily by their ilk in the media, including all the lies about previous disinformation.
This thread is simply spiking the ball on the OP's domestic enemies. They are so close to censoring their opposition they can taste it. Just wait until more people are jailed for disagreeing with groomers like the OP. His excitement will balloon with daily threads bragging about who they will fleece and jail next. It is how authoritarians work.
Any speech the OP or his ilk disagree with is "hate" and "Russian Disinformation". Forget all the lies that are told daily by their ilk in the media, including all the lies about previous disinformation.
This thread is simply spiking the ball on the OP's domestic enemies. They are so close to censoring their opposition they can taste it. Just wait until more people are jailed for disagreeing with groomers like the OP. His excitement will balloon with daily threads bragging about who they will fleece and jail next. It is how authoritarians work.
Page 3 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News