- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obama's CDC study on Firearms.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:46 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:46 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
There are more Democrats than Republicans in the country at present - thanks, Trump!
No.
quote:
Oversampling doesn't usually get you into the 80s, btw. That's just you guys being on the wrong side of public opinion on this.
Now we're getting in to wording of the poll and sampling methodology. Both are horseshite to say the least.
And I know far, far more about this subject than you
1
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:47 pm to SidewalkDawg
quote:
The Assault weapons ban was passed by politicians who know nothing about firearms. It was aptly named to invoke fear.
The ATF did not pass this bill. They were simply responsible for enforcing the law as written.
Which means at one point the ATF classified AR-15s as assault weapons, directly contradicting your earlier statement that they had never done so.
Whoooooops.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:48 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Some did. And some detailed why an AR-15 was superior to a Mini-14.
What are the differences? I mean obviously if you linked all these articles and read them, so you should easily be able to answer this.
quote:
I gave you my answer in the form of half a dozen links. You're welcome.
Links to articles is not you answering question.
I mean I would expect Ms. Scientist to understand you can't submit an academic paper that's nothing but quotes from other people...
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:48 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
You want me to validate YOUR claim?
Of course not, that's already done.
What I'd like you to do is explain why your claim that it's not over the expected is valid - mainly by illustrating what you believe should be used as the "expected" value.
Because when we use what I've said should be the expected value, clearly we're in an epidemic. For you to reject that, you must have another expected - so go on, share it. It's okay.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:49 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
I mean, whatever you want to call it, the guy in Vegas modified his gun to simulate automatic fire and killed 58 people and wounded almost 500 more.
Imagine if he had used something more effective...
quote:
shibboleths
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:50 pm to Centinel
quote:
No.
Yes.
quote:
Now we're getting in to wording of the poll and sampling methodology. Both are horseshite to say the least.
You're not a pollster, so your opinion on their methodology and wording is invalid. And it's not just one polling outfit decimating your claims - are you saying every single one is using the exact same biases and question wordings?
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:50 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Which means at one point the ATF classified AR-15s as assault weapons, directly contradicting your earlier statement that they had never done so.
The ATF did not change their definition in response to this bill. They simply enforced the law that was passed. Namely that any rifle containing 2 or more of the "bad" features was banned from sale.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:50 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Which means at one point the ATF classified AR-15s as assault weapons, directly contradicting your earlier statement that they had never done so.
Whoooooops.
That isn't what that means...
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:50 pm to Centinel
quote:
What are the differences?
They're pretty clearly laid out in every link provided. Spend a moment, read them.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:51 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
They're pretty clearly laid out in every link provided. Spend a moment, read them.
Links to articles is not you answering question.
I mean I would expect Ms. Scientist to understand you can't submit an academic paper that's nothing but quotes from other people...
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:52 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Which means at one point the ATF classified AR-15s as assault weapons, directly contradicting your earlier statement that they had never done so.
That is incorrect, the author of the bill define it not the ATF.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:52 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Imagine if he had used something more effective...
Imagine if he didn't have access to something at the level of effectiveness that he did...
quote:
shibboleths
Means exactly how I'm using it.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:53 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
level of effectiveness
You don't even know what this means.
quote:
Means exactly how I'm using it.
No it doesn't.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:53 pm to SidewalkDawg
quote:
The ATF did not change their definition in response to this bill. They simply enforced the law that was passed. Namely that any rifle containing 2 or more of the "bad" features was banned from sale.
Would one of the rifles banned from sale have the nickname "AR-15"?
And would such ban be enforced by an agency such as the ATF, which then had certain 'classifications' of guns that fit the ban and certain 'classifications' of guns which did not?
Yeah, exactly.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:54 pm to BamaAtl
It's also a good time to bring vehicle registrations up again.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:54 pm to Centinel
quote:
Links to articles is not you answering question.
It sure is, when said article contains the answers.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:54 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Answered with half a dozen links earlier in the thread.
YOU didn't answer anything.
You provided 5 links. Two said the mini 14 is better than the AR-15, two claimed that an AR-15 is better than a mini 14, and one was a video that was already in one of the other links.
So let me get this straight. Your grand rebuttal to ban AR-15's but leave Mini 14's alone is to link 2 articles that claim an AR-15 is better and two that claim the mini 14 is better?
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:54 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It sure is, when said article contains the answers.
I mean I would expect Ms. Scientist to understand you can't submit an academic paper that's nothing but quotes from other people...
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:55 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
features
quote:
'classifications'
What are you confused about?
I'm here to help, sport.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 9:55 pm to wickowick
I know, I know!!!!
Page 46 of 58
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News