Started By
Message

re: NY election system can’t tell if Mandami actually won.

Posted on 7/28/26 at 4:03 pm to
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
27342 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 4:03 pm to
One of the oldest ballot stuffing cheat in deep blue ghettos is to get a dem to switch party "affiliation" to the GOP and act as a pole monitor.
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
22269 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 4:24 pm to
The main voting station in Philly was one large room, surrounded by wall to wall windows. The tables / election officials were seated in the middle of the room. There was not one Republican monitor in the room. They were forced to watch the vote counting from outside, looking in through the windows. Shown on a video, Democratic vote counters took large sheets of plywood & covered every window, to the extent nothing could be viewed from the outside.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
24652 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 4:52 pm to
But, but, but...... we were assured that our elctions are secure?????
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175423 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 5:31 pm to
Going into the election he was leading most polls by double digits

Guess all that was fake and made up too right?
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48207 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 5:33 pm to
We’ll never know, will we?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175423 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

We’ll never know, will we?

Seems likely that he won

Do you think Cuomo actually won?

Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48207 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 5:36 pm to
I think we’ll never know.

But you seem ok with that. An odd take from the #democracy crowd.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175423 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

I think we’ll never know.

But you seem ok with that.

I think this topic is just more made up nonsense honestly
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48207 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 5:40 pm to
You can think that all you like, but we still don’t know for sure, and most Americans can justifiably believe that this is a problem.

It’s not complicated. Our elections are objectively broken.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175423 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 5:57 pm to
A random claim about voter fraud isn't sufficient evidence to claim you don't know the outcome of an election. And why would you only make the claims when you don't like the outcome?
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63568 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

Seems likely that he won


…and people say the left doesn’t care about election validity.

It seems fine. What the hell are we even concerned with?
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48207 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 6:47 pm to
Random? This is happening all over the country.

quote:

And why would you only make the claims when you don't like the outcome?


That saw cuts both ways
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74378 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

” After examining 1 million of the total 2.2 million voters who participated in the election, her organization discovered that 7 percent were nonexistent in records, 6 percent had fake Social Security numbers, and 10 percent didn’t even live in NYC.


But.. but.. how can this be? After all, the media has assured us repeatedly that election fraud doesn’t happen at all anywhere in the US. They wouldn’t lie to us would they?!?

Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
129603 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

her organization discovered that 7 percent were nonexistent in records, 6 percent had fake Social Security numbers, and 10 percent didn’t even live in NYC.


Sounds like a legit system.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74378 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

A random claim about voter fraud isn't sufficient evidence to claim you don't know the outcome of an election. And why would you only make the claims when you don't like the outcome?


You mean a “random” claim from a NY election auditor?
Posted by DeBoar
Member since Jan 2024
3508 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

A random claim about voter fraud isn't sufficient evidence to claim you don't know the outcome of an election. And why would you only make the claims when you don't like the outcome?


You are a moron.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
98264 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

Going into the election he was leading most polls by double digits Guess all that was fake and made up too right?


You of all people who got embarrassed by polls twice are going to bat for this commie?

Lulz
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
83275 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

A random claim about voter fraud isn't sufficient evidence to claim you don't know the outcome of an election.


The question isn't the outcome.

We know that the system declared Mamdani the winner, no one is challenging that.

The question is about the reliability and credibility of the system.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram