- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not even gonna make a suggestion. If I can get a serious answer, what do you guys on here
Posted on 6/3/22 at 10:49 pm to LSU alum wannabe
Posted on 6/3/22 at 10:49 pm to LSU alum wannabe
Mandatory firearms training for all males. Require every able bodied male to annually qualify with a pistol. Require every able bodied male, who is not otherwise prohibited or who registers as a conscientious objector to be armed at all times.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 10:53 pm to Bbobalou
quote:
You seem to place a greater importance on federal over state.
From what I've been reading about Louisiana law, after a certain amount of time, state law allows felons to possess firearms. However, federal law still prohibits possession unless you have formally had your 2A rights restored. That can only be done via governor pardon.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 10:58 pm to Gifman
quote:
quote:
federal felony
Was the felony gun-related? If not, then frick off.
I think you meant that if it was gun related then frick off.
It wasn't gun related and even says I never had one or was around one.
quote:
From what I've been reading about Louisiana law, after a certain amount of time, state law allows felons to possess firearms. However, federal law still prohibits possession unless you have formally had your 2A rights restored. That can only be done via governor pardon
presidential.
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 11:01 pm
Posted on 6/3/22 at 11:17 pm to LSU alum wannabe
quote:
What do guns rights folks suggest? Take guns off the table or put them on, you decide. Either way what’s an idea?
They're off the table for me for two reasons:
1. They are a right, a freedom. Period. The Bill of Rights was created as a specific set of limits on the federal government so as to help prevent domestic tyranny. To attempt to take away a freedom of the people, regardless of what it is or why, is to attempt to exert more control over them. That's a very large, fear-driven step towards despotism, especially when a member of Congress now refers to a freedom as "bullshite".
2. To look at the shootings as the problem is short-sighted and a bit juvenile. The problem isn't the shootings, those are just a symptom. Going after firearms is just an easy dodge for politicians to say they've done something while actually avoiding the real problem. The problem is the growing lack of fathers in the lives of children and a growing lack of stable homes. Those aren't being discussed in the halls of Congress because it's not as simple to understand (nor address) as "take away guns". It requires putting aside political party rhetoric as well as admitting that there's no overnight solution as well as conceding that there may well be very little government can actually do to address this.
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 11:18 pm
Posted on 6/3/22 at 11:20 pm to LSU alum wannabe
1. Arrest illegal aliens at the border. Kick their arse Back.
2. Instruct children on safe useage of firearms.
3. Restore playground-social-hierarchy. No more “great try Johnny, you would probably win if you lopped your dick off.”
4. No abortion. Knocked up = get fckn married, get a trade, feed your family.
5. Gov’t can completely frick off in every aspect of my and your life except defending,exclusively, our national sovereignty and UPHOLDING an agreed upon code of laws
Have sone personal fricking responsibility for each and everyone.
Thank you - rant over for now
If you read the news … regardless of conservative or liberal and your question is “ WHAT IS GOVERNMENT GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS?!?” Please frick off
2. Instruct children on safe useage of firearms.
3. Restore playground-social-hierarchy. No more “great try Johnny, you would probably win if you lopped your dick off.”
4. No abortion. Knocked up = get fckn married, get a trade, feed your family.
5. Gov’t can completely frick off in every aspect of my and your life except defending,exclusively, our national sovereignty and UPHOLDING an agreed upon code of laws
Have sone personal fricking responsibility for each and everyone.
Thank you - rant over for now
If you read the news … regardless of conservative or liberal and your question is “ WHAT IS GOVERNMENT GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS?!?” Please frick off
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 11:23 pm
Posted on 6/3/22 at 11:21 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
Mandatory firearms training for all males. Require every able bodied male to annually qualify with a pistol
That will certainly improve the "kill" rate in the inner cities.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 11:45 pm to BFIV
quote:One could argue it's better that they hit their intended targets, which are typically other gang bangers.
That will certainly improve the "kill" rate in the inner cities.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 7:11 am to LSU alum wannabe
The first thing we need to do is address the broken family unit in this country. That starts with holding parents accountable for their children’s action at an early age.
We also need to address exactly what is be taught in our schools and start to reintroduce more religious/conservative values back into the schools for every student…..and fire every educator that goes against this policy.
It shouldn’t surprise anyone that a boy that wears dresses was probably bullied his whole life and eventually snaps and kills a bunch of people.
You may not like these points but I’d bet my arse mass shootings in schools would go down with this strategy.
We also need to address exactly what is be taught in our schools and start to reintroduce more religious/conservative values back into the schools for every student…..and fire every educator that goes against this policy.
It shouldn’t surprise anyone that a boy that wears dresses was probably bullied his whole life and eventually snaps and kills a bunch of people.
You may not like these points but I’d bet my arse mass shootings in schools would go down with this strategy.
This post was edited on 6/4/22 at 7:13 am
Posted on 6/4/22 at 7:54 am to LSU alum wannabe
Get rid of the gun free zone. It serves no purpose and emboldens the "bad guy". Every campus should have well trianed and armed personnel. Pay them more if need be. A police force should have the balls to engage or be fired.
I always here the left say "It takes a village", well, defend them like they are your's then or, get the frick out of the way and let someone who will.
If you are willing to give up freedom for a little safety, you deserve neither.
I always here the left say "It takes a village", well, defend them like they are your's then or, get the frick out of the way and let someone who will.
If you are willing to give up freedom for a little safety, you deserve neither.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 7:56 am to LSU alum wannabe
quote:
What do guns rights folks suggest?
Absolutely draconian mandatory minimum sentences for gun crime. You use a gun in a crime and your life is basically over.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 8:07 am to LSU alum wannabe
Put more guns on the table.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 8:12 am to LSU alum wannabe
We need to stick with the Second amendment. Limiting gun rights for law abiding citizens does not make anyone safer. If school safety is an issue then SROs can be placed in schools along with training for staff on how to respond to emergency situations.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 8:13 am to LSU alum wannabe
It isn't the gun that does the killing, it is the user, it is akin to wanting to ban cars because of crashes. They need to prosecute gun crimes and get those guns out of criminal hands. I'm not sure that you are aware, but there is a law that says you can't shoot someone.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 8:33 am to td01241
quote:
absolutely nothing put forth would prevent shootings.
Baloney! America has way more of these nutjob mass murderers per capita than most other countries. Is it because we have gun ownership? None of us believe that. Then why is it/ Answer that question and you have your plan of action. For the sake of argument, I don’t have an answer that I feel sure of.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 8:41 am to TitleistProV1X
quote:
I’d also be in favor of only allowing 18 year olds to buy shotguns and bolt action rifles.
So you’re in favor of shoving a rifle in the hands of an 18 year old and sending him off to die in the name of his country and then telling him he’s not responsible enough to purchase a rifle when he comes home.
frick you. You’re a pussy and don’t deserve the freedom you have.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 8:44 am to TitleistProV1X
quote:
I’d be in favor of limiting the size of magazine to a max of ~10 bullets.
Infringed, shall not be.
Posted on 6/4/22 at 9:11 am to dafif
quote:
I might take a stab at something if grammer and proper sentence structure would inform everyone what is being asked.
quote:
something if grammer
quote:
grammer
GRAMMAR
Posted on 6/4/22 at 9:18 am to TitleistProV1X
quote:
I’d be in favor of limiting the size of magazine to a max of ~10 bullets.
Why, you can change a mag in one second? Tell me what this will do?????
Posted on 6/4/22 at 9:20 am to Strannix
I suppose the only argument made for it is it could slow down violent offenders resulting in more time for law enforcement to kill or arrest them. It’s a terribly argument though. Most of these people don’t just buy the gun and go commit their heinous crimes. They practice a significant amount first and anyone who does that is very unlikely to allow a magazine change be what does them in.
Popular
Back to top



1









