- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
No restrictions on AI for 10 years in the BBB
Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:15 pm
Trump is trying to pass no restrictions on AI for 10 years in the BBB to try and compete with China for AI supremacy. This is a horrible idea just like the amnesty for Pharmaceutical companies making Covid vaccines. I understand wanting to out compete China, but our technology is advancing so fast that I don't believe that we can even predict what AI will be in ten years. What are your thoughts?
14
Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:16 pm to Neutral Underground
You seriously have zero clue and zero idea about anything about AI and your post shows it
Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:18 pm to FLTech
And yours does? Pot meet kettle.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:18 pm to Neutral Underground
patriots.win was calling it the Big Brother Bill.
LINK
I'm too dumb to understand it all, but here is one critique.
quote:
Groundpounder
Strip the big brother BS out of the BBB and we’ll talk then
MissingTrump
Need to strip all the pro AI bullshite out of there as well. Not being able to question the government on AI bullshite is insane. This is safe and effective 2.0
Groundpounder
That’s what I was referring to. If they want to incorporate AI into data management systems to make agencies work more effectively, fine. But the intel goons want to use it for nefarious purposes. I think a lot of people forget that the police state raided a President’s HOUSE over politically motivated BS. If they’re willing to do that to a President, what’s to stop them from abusing their new “monitor everyone and everything” AI program?
wharfthrowaway
Call your representatives to get the AI section removed
LINK
I'm too dumb to understand it all, but here is one critique.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:24 pm to Neutral Underground
Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:26 pm to FLTech
quote:
You seriously have zero clue and zero idea about anything about AI and your post shows it
10 years is still an incredibly long timeline for AI systems having 0 regulations
Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:28 pm to Neutral Underground
We, as a species, are making a huge mistake with AI. It becomes twice as smart every 6 months.
There will be a point of no return very soon. AI will bring down civilization before we can all nuke ourselves and AI may do it with those very same nukes.
There will be a point of no return very soon. AI will bring down civilization before we can all nuke ourselves and AI may do it with those very same nukes.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 2:04 pm to FLTech
quote:
ou seriously have zero clue and zero idea about anything about AI and your post shows it
Please explain how this is a good idea for us luddites....because on the face of it ..its sounds like a terrible idea. Almost ludicrous.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 2:22 pm to Neutral Underground
quote:
AI will be in ten years. What are your thoughts?
AI is still going up the hype cycle into the peak of inflated expectations. The upcoming next part with be the crash into the trough of disillusionment. Some people think we already hit peak, but I think that is coming still. There has been a pause in the visibility with the trade wars.
The below is from June of 2024 and what you are fearing is Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), that is still predicted 10+ years out and theoretical. AGI is not a forgone conclusion or achievable end goal. If true AGI happens though, hold onto you buttocks as life is going to change. Will it change for better or worse is unknown, but at that point man has become god. Interjecting religion into this, there is a great chance the anti-Christ will be born of man's creation.
There was once a great thread here to discuss such topics.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 2:32 pm to FLTech
quote:
You seriously have zero clue and zero idea about anything about AI and your post shows it
I hope I get the same deal AI shysters get when it comes to stealing intellectual property. If it is no longer theft when you steal big enough amounts of it then, buddy, I'm not going to be paying for streaming services any longer and I'm going to need a home datacenter for my Plex server.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 2:41 pm to FLTech
quote:
FLTech
Posted on 6/3/25 at 2:42 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
The below is from June of 2024 and what you are fearing is Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), that is still predicted 10+ years out and theoretical. AGI is not a forgone conclusion or achievable end goal. If true AGI happens though, hold onto you buttocks as life is going to change. Will it change for better or worse is unknown, but at that point man has become god. Interjecting religion into this, there is a great chance the anti-Christ will be born of man's creation.
I do not think transformer models are the path to AGI. Right now, I see LLMs as a good parlor trick that can give you a quick executive summarization of what would have taken much longer with manual searching. However, the trust level in the contents means you always need to verify what it is saying once you've gotten the broad strokes.
For example, in computer programming, I've found it useful for exposing some feature or concept I was grasping for but didn't have the correct magical term to unlock the documentation or wikipedia article that really tells me what I need to know. It is also very good at quickly knocking out rote bits and allowing me to focus on the more essential aspects of the solution. However, I always have to review what it generates thoroughly. However if it takes something that would have been hours of work before and turned it into a half hour of code review then I'm winning.
What I would not expect now or in the next 10 years is being able to treat an AI agent like a junior programmer. I think the level of human code review on that output would be too time consuming for me. LLM coding assistants can do some really amazing work but randomly just step on its own dick doing basic things. Having it do small bit side-by-side with your work is just going to be less time consuming than line by line reviews or writing pedantic testing suites.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 2:43 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
Please explain how this is a good idea for us luddites....because on the face of it ..its sounds like a terrible idea. Almost ludicrous.
bro it's FLTech
He's has zero expertise on this or any other topic and it's been shown a million times over on this board
Posted on 6/3/25 at 3:20 pm to Neutral Underground
I think it should be regulated. Lets bring in a panel of chinese from the ccp and let them set the parameters...........
Its like any other invention, good and bad can occur, thats why you can put in laws if things go sideways. To have a bunch of 80 year old congressmen put up guardrails on an unknown road....will lead us to nowhere while china, india, south korea own us.
If we had just been able to stop the Manhattan Project we would not have nuclear weapons......right.....right.
Its like any other invention, good and bad can occur, thats why you can put in laws if things go sideways. To have a bunch of 80 year old congressmen put up guardrails on an unknown road....will lead us to nowhere while china, india, south korea own us.
If we had just been able to stop the Manhattan Project we would not have nuclear weapons......right.....right.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 3:24 pm to mwade91383
quote:
I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.
So... MTG is using the "We have to pass it to find out what's in it" defense.
There's no excuse to pass ANY bill in the House and then be surprised at what you've gone and voted for. None at all.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 3:26 pm to FLTech
quote:
You seriously have zero clue
Well... somebody seriously has zero clue...
Posted on 6/3/25 at 3:26 pm to Powerman
quote:
10 years is still an incredibly long timeline for AI systems having 0 regulations
Since when can we start issuing worldwide regulations?
Posted on 6/3/25 at 4:01 pm to lotik
It’s going to take several years to get the AI infrastructure built. This is why. We currently don’t have infrastructure to handle AI with power plants, data centers, etc.
So you are wanting them to put restrictions on AI before the infrastructure is even built? This is why they have asked for 10 years.
Surely you people didn’t think that the massive data centers, servers, power plants, etc magically get built at the snap of a finger did ya? Or did you?
I can’t tell these days what people actually know and what they pretend to know.
So you are wanting them to put restrictions on AI before the infrastructure is even built? This is why they have asked for 10 years.
Surely you people didn’t think that the massive data centers, servers, power plants, etc magically get built at the snap of a finger did ya? Or did you?
I can’t tell these days what people actually know and what they pretend to know.
This post was edited on 6/3/25 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 6/3/25 at 4:34 pm to Neutral Underground
quote:
What are your thoughts?
Op is a frightened boomer.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 4:36 pm to Bunk Moreland
Well if racist Pedro is posting we know its bullshite
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News