Started By
Message

No doubt this is what our founders wanted when they forgot about term limits for Congress

Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:58 am
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
185307 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:58 am
The difference is our founders were honorable men so there was never a thought in their mind that we would have the scum in Congress we do today








Wonder where his Chinese spy wife is
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
5861 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:59 am to
I think they also fell into the trap of assuming the voters would do a good job. Having representative government was sort of a new thing back then and I don't think anyone really understood the weight of incumbent advantage.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
125653 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:59 am to
Yeah, but the next guy is promising to vote for term limits!
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 8:00 am
Posted by TechBullDawg
Member since May 2014
2874 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:59 am to
Back in her motherland
Posted by rattlebucket
SELA
Member since Feb 2009
12987 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:02 am to
They also didnt see advancement in modern medicine. Most of these dudes wouldnt see their 80’s or have the financial ability to “serve” for 50 yrs

Term limits now!
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
36611 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:04 am to
What a shell of a person.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
83973 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:05 am to
The founders lived in a time of high trust.
Posted by dickkellog
little rock
Member since Dec 2024
3493 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:05 am to
you understand that before the 17th amendment the senate served at the pleasure of the state legislatures and the framers set congressional terms at two years.

so there are your term limits.
Posted by canyon
MM23
Member since Dec 2003
22495 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:06 am to
quote:

shill

Fixed
Posted by RemyLeBeau
Member since Mar 2015
2384 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:06 am to
quote:

I think they also fell into the trap of assuming the voters would do a good job. Having representative government was sort of a new thing back then and I don't think anyone really understood the weight of incumbent advantage.


The Antifederalists certainly did not trust men to always do the right thing. Just like petitioning for the Bill of Rights, they were met with the opposition saying these things are already implied. Madison was adamant that we could not leave ambiguity to those in power.
Posted by mark65mc
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
11573 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:10 am to
Another difference was the access to your rep. Each rep represented about 50k citizens. Now they represent 3/4 of a million. We should increase the count to 1 rep per county/parish, at a minimum. That would get us closer to the representation that we had at the beginning.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
26819 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:11 am to
quote:

The founders lived in a time of high trust.

Uh, no.

A HUGE element in the Constitution is checks against tyrannical authority. They didn’t trust government power AT ALL.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
185307 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:12 am to
Posted by WickedTiger
Member since Apr 2026
228 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:13 am to
Term limits please.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
83973 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:14 am to
True.

They didn't trust government, but they did trust that on average, men would behave decently.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
15111 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:14 am to
quote:


I think they also fell into the trap of assuming the voters would do a good job.


No, they specifically didn't.

That's why they never conceived of a United States in which every dullard over 18 who can fog a mirror could also vote.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
185307 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:15 am to
quote:

We should increase the count to 1 rep per county/parish, at a minimum. That would get us closer to the representation that we had at the beginning.


frick that. We don't need that many retards trying to pass their pet projects and laws
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
15111 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:16 am to
quote:

The founders lived in a time of high trust.


All one has to do is read the Bill of Rights to dispel that notion.
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
5976 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:27 am to
quote:

The difference is our founders were honorable men so there was never a thought in their mind that we would have the scum in Congress we do today


I'm afraid I have to counterpoint this one.
They'd been dealing with scumbag bureaucrats under King George. They knew full well what corrupt men in power were like.
They took steps against that.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61838 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:27 am to
Many of our founders were shite bags too. Many were motivated by their own economic self interests.

Some of the founders wanted to use independence and new govt to remain rich and powerful. Today’s shite bags want ti use govt to get rich and powerful as a result of being elected.

This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 8:48 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram