
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
No doubt this is what our founders wanted when they forgot about term limits for Congress
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:58 am
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:58 am
The difference is our founders were honorable men so there was never a thought in their mind that we would have the scum in Congress we do today
Wonder where his Chinese spy wife is
Wonder where his Chinese spy wife is
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:59 am to stout
I think they also fell into the trap of assuming the voters would do a good job. Having representative government was sort of a new thing back then and I don't think anyone really understood the weight of incumbent advantage.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:59 am to stout
Yeah, but the next guy is promising to vote for term limits! 
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 8:00 am
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:02 am to stout
They also didnt see advancement in modern medicine. Most of these dudes wouldnt see their 80’s or have the financial ability to “serve” for 50 yrs
Term limits now!
Term limits now!
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:05 am to stout
The founders lived in a time of high trust.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:05 am to stout
you understand that before the 17th amendment the senate served at the pleasure of the state legislatures and the framers set congressional terms at two years.
so there are your term limits.
so there are your term limits.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:06 am to StansberryRules
quote:
I think they also fell into the trap of assuming the voters would do a good job. Having representative government was sort of a new thing back then and I don't think anyone really understood the weight of incumbent advantage.
The Antifederalists certainly did not trust men to always do the right thing. Just like petitioning for the Bill of Rights, they were met with the opposition saying these things are already implied. Madison was adamant that we could not leave ambiguity to those in power.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:10 am to stout
Another difference was the access to your rep. Each rep represented about 50k citizens. Now they represent 3/4 of a million. We should increase the count to 1 rep per county/parish, at a minimum. That would get us closer to the representation that we had at the beginning.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:11 am to TrueTiger
quote:
The founders lived in a time of high trust.
Uh, no.
A HUGE element in the Constitution is checks against tyrannical authority. They didn’t trust government power AT ALL.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:12 am to TigerFanatic99
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:14 am to Ag Zwin
True.
They didn't trust government, but they did trust that on average, men would behave decently.
They didn't trust government, but they did trust that on average, men would behave decently.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:14 am to StansberryRules
quote:
I think they also fell into the trap of assuming the voters would do a good job.
No, they specifically didn't.
That's why they never conceived of a United States in which every dullard over 18 who can fog a mirror could also vote.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:15 am to mark65mc
quote:
We should increase the count to 1 rep per county/parish, at a minimum. That would get us closer to the representation that we had at the beginning.
frick that. We don't need that many retards trying to pass their pet projects and laws
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:16 am to TrueTiger
quote:
The founders lived in a time of high trust.
All one has to do is read the Bill of Rights to dispel that notion.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:27 am to stout
quote:
The difference is our founders were honorable men so there was never a thought in their mind that we would have the scum in Congress we do today
I'm afraid I have to counterpoint this one.
They'd been dealing with scumbag bureaucrats under King George. They knew full well what corrupt men in power were like.
They took steps against that.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 8:27 am to stout
Many of our founders were shite bags too. Many were motivated by their own economic self interests.
Some of the founders wanted to use independence and new govt to remain rich and powerful. Today’s shite bags want ti use govt to get rich and powerful as a result of being elected.
Some of the founders wanted to use independence and new govt to remain rich and powerful. Today’s shite bags want ti use govt to get rich and powerful as a result of being elected.
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 8:48 am

Popular
Back to top


20












