re: Newly released 9/11 footage of Pentagon: Airliner or missile?

"new" footage...the video linked was uploaded in 2017

Here's the same one from 2007:

Youtube

The Pentagon thing is interesting in the sense that truthers seem to be split down the middle as to whether that is the achilles heel of the official story or a disinfo angle meant to throw the scent off of better evidence in the conspiracy theories.

quote:

---

Having said that, what do aviation experts have to say about the possibility of a plane being able to fly so low to the ground?

---

No aviation expert but from my limited understanding, the plane is flying at its lowest point, just before it crashes into the ground.

quote:

---

How do you think they got there?

---

So they took off, landed at a black site (without being seen on radar), disassembled the plane, brought parts of the plane to the Pentagon, then hit it with a missile?

quote:

---

Were there any parts of torn up grass, concrete, pavement prior to hitting the building?

---

There were knocked over lightpoles and a messed up generator

Here is one of them:

One of the things truthers say is it was some insane ninja move only an expert could make to put that plane in that spot. The obvious response is that it doesn't require a lot of proficiency to crash a plane.

quote:

---

So they took off, landed at a black site (without being seen on radar),

---

Yes. If the world can unintentionally (maybe) lose an entire Malaysia airlines flight, then we can intentionally lose 4.

quote:

---

disassembled the plane, brought parts of the plane to the Pentagon, then hit it with a missile?

---

Those parts weren't from the real plane. They were just spare parts that the CIA had picked up over the previous several years to use for this occasion. They were part of the missile payload. Additional items from the "passengers" were littered about the site by the the first NTSB team to arrive, which were actually CIA special ops personnel, who were actually lizard people under orders from the global hegemony.

I can't believe that anyone in this day and age is this far behind.

So I have seen a lot of explosions in my day. These are my thoughts.

1. The Pentagon is huge and the impact is far away from the camera. It makes the aircraft look small but it isn't. And it is too pixilated to actually determine any shape.

2. See the giant fireball. I mean, that is a bigger fireball than I have ever seen and I have seen buildings get smoked by explosions. That indicates to me that there is a lot of gas in whatever hit it rather than explosives. I wouldn't expect that from a small plane or cruise missile.

Pretty sure it is a commercial plane.

Remember where we were in 2000. We were a decade removed from the Cold War. The Balkans War was over. George W. Bush was running on a non-interventionist platform. Many people were questioning the relevance of NATO. Then 9/11 occurred.

Since 9/11, we have been at war continuously. Our defense budget is ridiculous. We have created the largest surveillance apparatus in world history and our foreign policy is one of hyper-intervention. Who does this benefit? It benefits a small group of politically connected interest groups, namely defense contractors, weapons manufacturers, tech companies and high-powered lobbyists for these industries.

It's one thing to claim 9/11 was an inside job, but I think the knee-jerk criticisms of anyone who questions the official government narrative of 9/11 is even worse. 9/11 was the catalyst for perpetual war, the erosion of American's civil liberties and a growth in government and bureaucracy unseen in a generation.