- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 4/28/25 at 1:47 pm to Big4SALTbro
quote:
GA is the worst because it’s full of republicans that are compromised cheaters
That’s just GOPe globalist vs MAGA imo.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 1:47 pm to TheHarahanian
quote:
Isn’t all of the code used in voting systems required to be audited?
Lol.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:01 pm to lake chuck fan
It looks like in person voting would go a long way to mitigating this.
If you had two people assigned a single voter ID number, when they both show up in person the problem would immediately present itself in a very transparent way.
If you had two people assigned a single voter ID number, when they both show up in person the problem would immediately present itself in a very transparent way.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:03 pm to beaux duke
quote:
it hasn't been indisputable evidence, should be easy to do so and yet....
Newly discovered. Which court case is there to present the evidence?
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:04 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:I don't want to overturn anything. I want to PREVENT it from happening again.
still at the “evidence, but not enough to overturn any results“ stage.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:04 pm to Penrod
quote:
The proper position is to wait and see. If it’s true the Trump Administration will be all over it, and it will have its day in court.
How will it get to court? What will the petition be?
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:08 pm to Penrod
quote:What the "no evidence" comment(s) refer to is not arrests/indictments but the refusal to even investigate in the past stating "no evidence".
Do you think this information in the OP is legitimate evidence? If you do it shows your bias. The proper position is to wait and see. If it’s true the Trump Administration will be all over it, and it will have its day in court. THEN it will be evidence…or it won’t. But we have seen a lot of these sort of revelations that turned out to be complete bullshite.
Of course there wasn't any evidence, there was no investigation.
quote:Fed judges injunctions imminent?
I don't want to overturn anything. I want to PREVENT it from happening again.
no chance. If anything there will be judges orders to remove this info from the public domain so that anyone who publishes it or tries to use it to launch an investigation will be hit with contempt of court, at a minimum, charge.This post was edited on 4/28/25 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:09 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Newly discovered. Which court case is there to present the evidence?
listen i know you're a lawyer
the term indisputable evidence doesn't mean jack shite from an online article
this same sleuth tried to make the same argument about georgia elections 6 months ago. were election fraud attorneys just sitting on their hands during that time, unwilling to take up a case with indisputable evidence of voter fraud? seems like it would be a slam dunk and the case of a lifetime for an attorney. and yet, crickets. nothing.
fan fiction
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:22 pm to Penrod
quote:Except for this one major caveat...
But we have seen a lot of these sort of revelations that turned out to be complete bullshite.
Nimrod did not post this revelation.
Therefore, the chances of it being legitimate are exponentially increased.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:26 pm to I20goon
quote:
no chance. If anything there will be judges orders to remove this info from the public domain so that anyone who publishes it or tries to use it to launch an investigation will be hit with contempt of court, at a minimum, charge
Sure, a political hack judge could block it, but I doubt it would stand on appeal. The DOJ would be hard to stop if they ever would seriously pursue this.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:42 pm to loogaroo
Solid red? Maybe in your trailer park.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:41 pm to beaux duke
quote:
listen i know you're a lawyer the term indisputable evidence doesn't mean jack shite from an online article
Non responsive to the question I asked. Which court case can this newly found evidence be presented as you intimated would happen?
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:48 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Non responsive to the question I asked. Which court case can this newly found evidence be presented as you intimated would happen?
ah. i get it. not unexpected. this is the part where you want to argue semantics as if we were in court, and ignore that the "indisputable evidence" presented isn't just an oped article
same song, different day
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:50 pm to beaux duke
quote:
want to argue semantics
Your entire premise was to dismiss the evidence because it hasn’t been presented to a court. It’s a stupid premise because there isn’t a case that provides the opportunity. You got called out for your idiocy so now you have to act like a victim of semantics.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:53 pm to beaux duke
quote:
were election fraud attorneys just sitting on their hands during that time, unwilling to take up a case with indisputable evidence of voter fraud?
A good question.
quote:
seems like it would be a slam dunk and the case of a lifetime for an attorney.
Define lifetime.
Therein may lie the problem.
I mean…
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:21 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Your entire premise was to dismiss the evidence because it hasn’t been presented to a court. It’s a stupid premise because there isn’t a case that provides the opportunity. You got called out for your idiocy so now you have to act like a victim of semantics.
there it is. bbonds daily dose of lecturing everyone about how much smarter he is and how dumb anyone who dare present a different opinion must be.
i am dismissing "evidence" because it hasn't been presented in court. it isn't evidence. it's an article posted on a highly biased site by the same guy who tried to make the same "irrefutable evidence" claim in georgia six months ago, complete with the same image of computer code that scares boomers
fan fiction
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:27 pm to lake chuck fan
Mike knew
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:28 pm to beaux duke
quote:
beaux duke
Still waiting around for black Monday you dumb count?
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:32 pm to dgnx6
what's black monday?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News